DOJ Says They Have More Evidence... In Court Filing

Billy_Bob

Diamond Member
Sep 4, 2014
30,837
20,606
1,945
Top Of The Great Divide
Its looking like the DOJ went to the Adam Schiff school of making things up. The corruption runs deep in the current DOJ and FBI.

In the 53-page document the DOJ uses UNNAMED SOURCES to state they have more evidence on Trump. This will not end well in the 11th Cricut Court of Appeals. DO they really think these judges will not see this? UNNAMED equals HEARSAY. This is not going to end well for the DOJ.

The same tactic Adma Schiff used in Russia, Russia, Russia is now being employed by the DOJ.



 
Its looking like the DOJ went to the Adam Schiff school of making things up. The corruption runs deep in the current DOJ and FBI.

In the 53-page document the DOJ uses UNNAMED SOURCES to state they have more evidence on Trump. This will not end well in the 11th Cricut Court of Appeals. DO they really think these judges will not see this? UNNAMED equals HEARSAY. This is not going to end well for the DOJ.

The same tactic Adma Schiff used in Russia, Russia, Russia is now being employed by the DOJ.



What tactic did Schiff use?
 
What tactic did Schiff use?
You seem to have a very short memory... Schiff stated he had ample evidence of Trumps guilt in the Russia hoax. Schiff never did have any evidence and his slander still stands today. Now that the Russia Hoax is proven lies and a democrat plan to keep Trump from power Schiff is known as a master liar and propogandist that would make Bagdad bob and Josef Goebbels blush with envy.
 
You seem to have a very short memory... Schiff stated he had ample evidence of Trumps guilt in the Russia hoax. Schiff never did have any evidence and his slander still stands today. Now that the Russia Hoax is proven lies and a democrat plan to keep Trump from power Schiff is known as a master liar and propogandist that would make Bagdad bob and Josef Goebbels blush with envy.
I remember Schiff saying their was evidence in plain site, which their was.

Is that what you were talking about?
 
Really? That "plain site" evidence was bought and paid for BS by Clinton and the DNC..
Bought by Clinton and DNC? While opposition research is perfectly legal, this isn't about the dossier and the Republican investigation, lead by Mueller, didn't take the dossier into account anyhow.

1. Trump asked for Russia to hack Hillary's computer/server ...which coincidentally became public after Russia produced the emails.

2. Trump penned his own kids lie about the Trump tower meeting. I mean how low can you go as a father. Good grief.

3 Trump backed Putin at the expense of our intelligence agencies on the global stage in Helsinki. The only thing more shocking then that is that the corpse of Reagan didn't rise from the floor and melt Trump's with face with lasers of fire that came out his eyes.

That sure seems like evidence in plain site to me.
 

Forum List

Back
Top