Sky Dancer
Rookie
- Jan 21, 2009
- 19,307
- 1,320
- 0
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #121
My faith leaves the final judgment to God and supports equitable consequences for breaking the laws that society deems necessary to protect and defend the rights of those in a just civilization.
I couldn't serve on a jury in which a verdict could result in the death penalty for most crimes. I think Jesus was pretty clear that the old laws of an 'eye for an eye' were not sanctioned by God and needed to be redesigned.
But as some have noted, if there is no ultimate penalty, there is no incentive not to kill any witnesses. If there is no ultimate penalty, there is no incentive not to brutally torture, maim, and mutilate a victim. In my opinion there is a huge difference between the robber who shoots a victim in a moment of high stress or the violent reaction in a crime of passion and the guy who inflicts as much fear, grief, pain, and suffering upon his victim as possible. To me there is a difference between the guy who strikes and kills his neighbor in a moment of rage and the trucker who kidnapped and brutally raped a young girl, cut off her forearms, and left her naked in the middle of the highway to bleed to death or be struck by traffic. (She survived. I hope he didn't.)
So while my relgion does not take a position on this, my faith does permit me to support the death penalty in those extreme cases
Interesting. Your faith allows one man, an executioner to kill another, even in your faith vegeance belongs to God.
Of course, I may not have understood your view at all. I frequently don't.