Does the U.S. have a trade deficit with Canada? No!

Read the rest of the thread, that ground has already been covered.
I reckon you tweeted that from 31,000 ft on the way to Singapore.

A1.jpg
Context is king, even ignoring the photoshop this puts a bad light on something that didn't actually happen. Here is the real photo.

2018-06-10_11-46-53.jpg

2018-06-10_11-45-21.jpg

Fake news only showed your version of it.
That Viral G-7 Photo As Seen From ‘The Other Side’
Real news showed it all.
 
The topic of this thread is does the us have a trade deficit with Canada.
Protectionism is a valid sub-topic of that topic.
You as OP should know.


I also heard that Canada charges 10% on our auto's and we only charge like 1.8% on theirs.

You heard wrong.

There is a trade treaty in automobiles between Canada and the US called the Auto Pact. It was signed in 1965 and removed all tariffs on automobiles between the two countries.

The Canada—United States Automotive Products Agreement, commonly known as the Auto Pact or APTA, was a trade agreement between Canada and the United States. It was signed by Prime Minister Lester B. Pearson and President Lyndon B. Johnson in January 1965. ... The signing of the agreement in 1965 removed the tariffs between the two countries.​

Canada–United States Automotive Products Agreement - Wikipedia
 
I repeat from the OP:

The president frequently suggests the United States is losing money with these deficits, but countries do not “lose” money on trade deficits. A trade deficit simply means that people in one country are buying more goods from another country than people in the second country are buying from the first.

Americans want to buy these products from overseas, either because of quality or price. If Trump sparked a trade war and tariffs were increased on Canadian goods, then it would raise the cost of those products to Americans. Perhaps that would reduce American purchases of those goods, and thus reduce the trade deficit, but that would not mean the United States would “gain” money that had been lost. Meanwhile, trade deficits are also affected by macroeconomic factors, such as the relative strength of currencies, economic growth rates, and savings and investment rates.

Actually a trade deficit is almost the definition of losing money outside. If it doesn't come back as investments as it doesn't, it's lost forever to the Chinese vault.
 
Apparently, in Trumpland, trade in services simply does not count, even though it’s a big part of U.S. trade. In fact, the World Trade Organizationsays that trade in services is the “most dynamic segment in world trade, growing more quickly than trade in goods.” The United States is the dominant player, a fact highlighted by the 2018 annual report of the Council of Economic Advisers, released in February and signed by the president: “Focusing only on the trade in goods alone ignores the United States’ comparative advantage in services.”

Trade in services includes, among other things, telecommunications, accounting and legal services, and tourism. It’s not perhaps as solid and shiny as steel, but it’s a real export. In 2016, the U.S. services surplus was almost $25 billion, resulting in an overall trade surplus with Canada of $12.5 billion, according to the U.S. Trade Representative. (The Commerce Department’s Bureau of Economic Analysis says the surplus was $7.7 billion in 2016 and nearly $2.8 billion in 2017.)

The 2018 CEA report even includes a chart showing Canada has a trade surplus.

GTJF3OBQCIZW3EIFNTCGNKLEZI.png


The president frequently suggests the United States is losing money with these deficits, but countries do not “lose” money on trade deficits. A trade deficit simply means that people in one country are buying more goods from another country than people in the second country are buying from the first.

Americans want to buy these products from overseas, either because of quality or price. If Trump sparked a trade war and tariffs were increased on Canadian goods, then it would raise the cost of those products to Americans. Perhaps that would reduce American purchases of those goods, and thus reduce the trade deficit, but that would not mean the United States would “gain” money that had been lost. Meanwhile, trade deficits are also affected by macroeconomic factors, such as the relative strength of currencies, economic growth rates, and savings and investment rates.

The White House did not respond to a request to comment on why Trump consistently says the United States runs a trade deficit with Canada when official government figures show a surplus. According toour database of Trump’s false and misleading claims, he has made this false claim about Canada at least 10 times.

More: Analysis | Here’s why Trump keeps saying — wrongly — the U.S. has a trade deficit with Canada

Trump is conveniently ignoring trade in services - which gives the U.S. an overall trade "surplus" with Canada.

Do they have a military, or do they rely on us to pay for their protection?
290% tariffs on dairy that’s fair.
290% tariffs on automobiles from Canada should be fair.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Forum List

Back
Top