tommywho70x
Rookie
- Apr 15, 2010
- 826
- 60
- 0
- Banned
- #81
Yet during my 22 years on active duty I came within 15 minutes of being a casualty in three different terrorist attacks in Europe. Once with my wife present.
So, what are we saying here. Spend more money on national security, keep spending as it is, or reduce spending on national security? What kind of changes should we make for monitoring the Internet?
Since no one on this board has a real clue about what NSA monitors and how they monitor it I would say to simply allow them to continue. And until we get national security up to a decent standard yes, we should spend more. There are many less important things that can be cut. Not to mention fraud, waste, and abuse.
i've got a pretty fair idea of what the NSA monitors and how they do it. what i would like to know is if they have actually ever intercepted anything that made a significant difference or are they just some very expensive, high-tech voyeurs.