Its not sensible at all. Where do we get off locking people up without cause - that is what mandatory quarantine is. How are we going to pay to care and monitor these people for that time as well?Seems sensible to me. Don't we do that very thing for animals already? Can't take an animal from CONUS to Hawaii without some time in quarantine for example. And we're probably not worrying about ebola in that case. If the concern is ebola 21 days doesn't sound unreasonable. And the arguement doctors inclined to go try and help ebola victims wont because that can't sweat it out for 3 weeks doesn't hold water. They're brave enough to expose themselves to ebola but can't handle 3 weeks of daytime tv...Well ok ya that I can kinda see...
Simple solution - either it is safe enough for people to travel (as seems to be the case considering the WHOLE 2 cases we have had here) OR it is not safe and there needs to be a travel ban.
You either stop travel or you don't. Mandatory quarantine is not a solution at all.