- Jun 19, 2009
- 17,415
- 6,792
- 335
there is 0 doubt in all of creation the JW,s have it right.
About the Bible calling Michael the messiah yes, But Jesus (who isn't based on a singular historical character)wasn't Michael anymore then Daniel was Michael.
Throughout the NT This converged figure is talking about son of man (Dan calls Michael)to come in a third person tense as another person in his own name.
Try reading tenses properly.
LUKE 6:5, 9:26 , 9:55-56, 12:10 , 17:30 , 18:8, 22:69, John 3:13, Matthew 25:11-13, Mark 14:62 & Mathew20:28) including claiming he was emulating him (Rev 1:13)
and that son of man would come as another being in his own new name and that even he Theudas (the AD era christ) would see son of man with the others,truly wording that he's the spectator not the head of host everyone will finally see. Which agrees with Isaiah 66:19 about the time of the temple procession you the gentile have yet to see the face.
When Daniel is relaying a message from the head messenger Daniel is not confused for being the head of hosts he's speaking of, but Christianity turned Theudas into the son of man he spoke for and about (the one called father=a term we use for the head priest in the Temple to come). By making the father and spokesperson 1 is like making Daniel & Michael (the head of hosts as one). Christians recognizes this mistake everytime they bust on you Jehovah's Witnesses that Jesus isn't Michael, yet can't keep that logic to understand then Jesus isn't the head Priest head of Host Aka Michael who's name is in the Temple and who's the Moshiach ben David of the Bible. Christians have no understanding of the 2 cherubs (guardians) symbolized on the ark of the covenant, thus no idea about the 2 messiahs, Ben Joseph and Ben David.
Clueless about the 2 sticks coming to 1, and yet they tell the story of the 2 archs (morning star &Evening Star) and the battle between Lucifer the messenger of lies(darkness) & Michael the Messenger of truth (spiritual light)-Dan 10:21