Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yes, like the Patriot Act, which was continued and expanded by "liberals".When faced with a problem, the left automatically chooses the solution that leads to less freedom.
Ironic, considering they call themselves "liberals".
Like the Patriot Act?
If conservatives were intellectually honest and consistent in their beliefs,
they would want the 2nd Amendment repealed so that the individual states (states rights)) could decide how to regulate guns,
as opposed to having the big evil central government trump that freedom of choice.
What a lie DT. You just want a nation of sheep living under rules created by liberals.
No, I don't want a nation of paranoid nuts deciding that any gun regulation is an affront to our civil liberties. I don't want a nation led by the crazies, like yourself.
Do you know the difference between RvW and the Second Amendment?we dont need to remove it.
the founders worded in such a way we can police guns in any way we need to
Again: SCOTUS trumps angry internet retards.
That's what I've said many a time in Roe v Wade discussions. The retards howl in protest.
Just because most conservative solutions to problems are All or Nothing extremisms does not mean everyone is like that.
No, really, the criminals will follow this one! Honest!No. We cant ban guns. Its impractical. There are too many, too easy to hide. The cops wouldnt follow that order, neither would the military.
Now...I do wonder what the Founders would have written if they had an epedimic of colonial schoolhouses being massacred with muskets and bayonets by fellow citizens. But they didn't, their society didnt do that, except through warfare when the Brits did it.
Mental health is an answer to start with.
Second, not a gun ban, but measures for gun security. This kid should never have been near guns. They werent his. He wasn't 21, so he couldnt leagally own a pistol anyway. And that rifle should've been in a safe, somewhere he couldnt get it.
once again demonstrating that 20,000 failed gun control laws do not work because at the end of the day, criminals do not follow the law anyhow.
Do we need a constitutional convention to remove the second Amendment? This seems to be something you leftist are gunning for this morning.
Do we need a constitutional convention to remove the second Amendment? This seems to be something you leftist are gunning for this morning.
Nope. We don't need that and we don't need one to outlaw abortions or same sex marriage. Each would create a greater divide in an already divided country. What we need are rational and pragmatic laws, regulations and policies and a Congress willing to compromise for the good of the entire country.
No such thing....semi-automatic machine guns...
Do we need a constitutional convention to remove the second Amendment? This seems to be something you leftist are gunning for this morning.
Do we need a constitutional convention to remove the second Amendment? This seems to be something you leftist are gunning for this morning.
why would you need a constitutional convention?'
what "leftists"?
Do we need a constitutional convention to remove the second Amendment? This seems to be something you leftist are gunning for this morning.
Not remove but modify.
Personally..I have no problem with people owning guns to protect their homes or businesses.
No citizen should be allowed to carry guns in the streets.
Do we need a constitutional convention to remove the second Amendment? This seems to be something you leftist are gunning for this morning.
Nope. We don't need that and we don't need one to outlaw abortions or same sex marriage. Each would create a greater divide in an already divided country. What we need are rational and pragmatic laws, regulations and policies and a Congress willing to compromise for the good of the entire country.
Let's see, it's already illegal to steal weapons and murder people.
You saying the laws against theft and murder aren't rational and pragmatic? And that criminals will start obeying laws that are rational and pragmatic?
Personally..I have no problem with people owning guns to protect their homes or businesses.
No citizen should be allowed to carry guns in the streets.
All law abiding citizens that legally own their firearms should be allowed to carry them where ever the hell they want.
No "modifications" to the 2nd amendment needed.
The second amendment has nothing to do with private gun ownership.
And it never has.
We've corrupted the original intent.
can you own a rocketlauncher?
No.
Hence the "criminal" thing.
So...you want law-abiding people to face armed criminals with no means of self-defense.
Why is this a good thing?
States and localities create a group of government workers charged with that task.
They are called "police".
Catch up.
Do we need a constitutional convention to remove the second Amendment? This seems to be something you leftist are gunning for this morning.
What a lie DT. You just want a nation of sheep living under rules created by liberals.
No, I don't want a nation of paranoid nuts deciding that any gun regulation is an affront to our civil liberties. I don't want a nation led by the crazies, like yourself.
Not remove but modify.
Personally..I have no problem with people owning guns to protect their homes or businesses.
No citizen should be allowed to carry guns in the streets.
Yeah, the streets should belong to people who don't give a fuck what they're "allowed" to do. Everyone else should be home, cowering behind their steel-core doors and six deadbolts.
