That ^ is where you self-defeated your argument.The act is evil, if the person feels internally justified or not is what determines if they themselves are evil and that you dont understand that is ok, its a product if ego.Well since you can't poll their reasoning in order to conclude whether or not they even CONSIDER it genocide .... if they don't, then you BOTH favor "not genocide" and simply have a "difference of opinion" of how or what that looks like....NOT a difference between which of you is good and evil.Those who advocate mass genocide I think are evil as well as those who vote for those who advocate it.
But alas, we are not human until the birth fairy waves her magic wand over the unborn child as it exits the womb.
View attachment 70934
A lot of your arrogant brainwashed political hacks such as yourself seem to mistake percieved misguidedness for "good or evil" intent.
You're wrong, and the inability to unblock your ego in order to rationalize 2 sides of any coin is where Political-minded brainwashing has failed your senses.
Germans did not think killing Jews was genocide either because they did not consider them human. Jews were seen as vermin just like we dehumanize the unborn by calling it a fetus.
Dehumanizing people, like calling people infidels, is key to genocide.
Hey answer this: why is there a distinction between killing and murder?
There's something you can think about for a little while, as you wonder why anyone would say intent matters and not just the ACT.
The act of killing is justified in order to save other lives.
Most of the unborn don't qualify.
You agreed the intent matters.
Ipso facto, you cannot determine one good or evil unless you first learn their intent.
Whether or not they're MISGUIDED is irrelevant, it's their intent based upon what they actually DO think.
Thanks, ya did the work for me. N'er been easier.
So in your opinion, Hitler was not evil because he viewed Jews as an evil subhuman species, thus doing the world a favor?