michiganFats
Silver Member
- Banned
- #41
I'm not the one trying to get someone shot, perhaps you should re-evaluate your objectives?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who's "you guys," Beavis? Are you assuming facts not in evidence?As soon as you find where anyone, no matter who they are or what their stripe is, actually said or wrote that, please feel free to link it here so we can all check it out.Why else would they suggest that a line worker makes too much at $35 hr but it is ok for a CEO to make $20 million?
I don't need to prove it to you. All I need to do is ask the question.
Should a line worker at GM make $35 hr plus benefits?
So do you support a maximum wage? I didn't think so.
Remember you guys were attacking unions and how much they make?
But then we realized that you weren't just attacking Unions, because unions only make up around 18% of our workforce. No, you were attacking all labor. Then once the jobs are all down south, you'll send the jobs to mexico because even southern labor makes too much. But divide and concur. They can't hit us all at once or we will hit back.
Bush didn't have, or employ, any conservative policies. Bush wasn't a conservative.If conservative policies actually worked, I would be for them. I don't think in general that they do.
Wanting Obama to fail in terms of spening exhorbitant amounts of money and generally enacting more socialistic policies is a hair different than hoping people suffer. Much as you would like them to be, the two ideas are not mutally exclusive.
Reading through many of these threads it strikes me as somewhat peculiar to see so many self-identified republicans hoping (even praying) that Obama fails miserably and that America is befallen by an economic catastrophe of never-before-seen epic proportions. Isn't the only logical conclusion that they must hate America? What other reason could they have to so desperately hope for Americans to suffer more than we've ever suffered before?
Sealy is right, and marauder is wrong.
I swear you are now trying to get someone shot...
Bush didn't have, or employ, any conservative policies. Bush wasn't a conservative.If conservative policies actually worked, I would be for them. I don't think in general that they do.
Limbaugh and Hannity and the rest of conservadom admitted they were holding their nose to vote for Bush both times. Because the alternatives were just so bad. I don't know anyone who for one second believed however, that Bush would be as far away from conservative as you can get and still be an R.then why did conservatives vote for him, TWICE Marauder? in both of those campaigns, no conservatives were touting that he wasn't a conservative.....they were busy getting him reelected.
Who's "you guys," Beavis? Are you assuming facts not in evidence?As soon as you find where anyone, no matter who they are or what their stripe is, actually said or wrote that, please feel free to link it here so we can all check it out.
I don't need to prove it to you. All I need to do is ask the question.
Should a line worker at GM make $35 hr plus benefits?
So do you support a maximum wage? I didn't think so.
Remember you guys were attacking unions and how much they make?
But then we realized that you weren't just attacking Unions, because unions only make up around 18% of our workforce. No, you were attacking all labor. Then once the jobs are all down south, you'll send the jobs to mexico because even southern labor makes too much. But divide and concur. They can't hit us all at once or we will hit back.
Oh and, that's one of the knocks on FoxNews, they post rhetorical questions with no proof to back up the assumed conclusion. So, it's not OK for them to do so but it is OK for you?
No, it's not. Find where anyone ever said or wrote that, link it here to back your assertion, or just admit it's a regurgitated strawman talking point and let it go.
Your link doesn't take me where you wanted. Try copying the link on the specific post number you want me to see.Who's "you guys," Beavis? Are you assuming facts not in evidence?I don't need to prove it to you. All I need to do is ask the question.
Should a line worker at GM make $35 hr plus benefits?
So do you support a maximum wage? I didn't think so.
Remember you guys were attacking unions and how much they make?
But then we realized that you weren't just attacking Unions, because unions only make up around 18% of our workforce. No, you were attacking all labor. Then once the jobs are all down south, you'll send the jobs to mexico because even southern labor makes too much. But divide and concur. They can't hit us all at once or we will hit back.
Oh and, that's one of the knocks on FoxNews, they post rhetorical questions with no proof to back up the assumed conclusion. So, it's not OK for them to do so but it is OK for you?
No, it's not. Find where anyone ever said or wrote that, link it here to back your assertion, or just admit it's a regurgitated strawman talking point and let it go.
I found it! I should have made you bet me you little shit! LOL..
I created a thread about this. And wouldn't you know, the first reply I got was this:
http://www.usmessageboard.com/economy/65353-were-lowering-your-wages-26.html
Who's "you guys," Beavis? Are you assuming facts not in evidence?I don't need to prove it to you. All I need to do is ask the question.
Should a line worker at GM make $35 hr plus benefits?
So do you support a maximum wage? I didn't think so.
Remember you guys were attacking unions and how much they make?
But then we realized that you weren't just attacking Unions, because unions only make up around 18% of our workforce. No, you were attacking all labor. Then once the jobs are all down south, you'll send the jobs to mexico because even southern labor makes too much. But divide and concur. They can't hit us all at once or we will hit back.
Oh and, that's one of the knocks on FoxNews, they post rhetorical questions with no proof to back up the assumed conclusion. So, it's not OK for them to do so but it is OK for you?
No, it's not. Find where anyone ever said or wrote that, link it here to back your assertion, or just admit it's a regurgitated strawman talking point and let it go.
I found it! I should have made you bet me you little shit! LOL..
I created a thread about this. And wouldn't you know, the first reply I got was this:
http://www.usmessageboard.com/economy/65353-were-lowering-your-wages-26.html
I think that the problem people have with $30 per hour salaries has nothing to do with jealousy, nothing to do with wanting people to have trouble raising their families...and everything to do with whether or not that salary is economically feasible given the fact that people, by and large, do not seem to want to buy the $30 per hour employees cars as much as they want the $15 per hour employees car.
If a business is losing money because people don't want their product AND they are continuing to pay their employees double what other companies are paying...they are going to have trouble. And giving them more money so that they can continue to pay their employees double what other companies are paying and making products that the people don't want isn't going to solve the problem...its just going to delay the next time the company comes begging for money to save its employees.
Your link doesn't take me where you wanted. Try copying the link on the specific post number you want me to see.Who's "you guys," Beavis? Are you assuming facts not in evidence?
Oh and, that's one of the knocks on FoxNews, they post rhetorical questions with no proof to back up the assumed conclusion. So, it's not OK for them to do so but it is OK for you?
No, it's not. Find where anyone ever said or wrote that, link it here to back your assertion, or just admit it's a regurgitated strawman talking point and let it go.
I found it! I should have made you bet me you little shit! LOL..
I created a thread about this. And wouldn't you know, the first reply I got was this:
http://www.usmessageboard.com/economy/65353-were-lowering-your-wages-26.html
You don't know what my "side" is, this is why I asked you earlier if you were assuming facts not in evidence. You are.people on your side
I would say that Republicans hate America as much as Obama supporters.
Obama supporters are middle class Americans. Republicans hate poor people and middle class people. Why else would they suggest that a line worker makes too much at $35 hr but it is ok for a CEO to make $20 million?
So, we sort of resent it when rich people who got a big tax break over the last 8 years cry because Obama's going to take it away.
It was you guys who wanted the Iraq war. Well, it's time to start paying for it. Or did you think you would never have to pay for it?
I can never get a Republican to answer that. When do they want to pay for Iraq?
You don't know what my "side" is, this is why I asked you earlier if you were assuming facts not in evidence. You are.people on your side
Bumping a thread isn't the same as linking specifics, but I guess you know that too.
Your link doesn't take me where you wanted. Try copying the link on the specific post number you want me to see.I found it! I should have made you bet me you little shit! LOL..
I created a thread about this. And wouldn't you know, the first reply I got was this:
http://www.usmessageboard.com/economy/65353-were-lowering-your-wages-26.html
I just made a comment in the thread, "WE'RE LOWERING YOUR WAGES".
Hit New Posts and it will be one of the newest posts.
In it, you will see people on your side arguing that $30 hr is too much, it's artificial, it's too much because we can get it cheaper in Mexico.
Read through and tell me what you think.
But I'm sorry if you don't find some right winger saying exactly the words, "labor should not make $30hr."
But instead, they explain why labor should't get $30 hr.
As soon as you find where anyone, no matter who they are or what their stripe is, actually said or wrote that, please feel free to link it here so we can all check it out.Why else would they suggest that a line worker makes too much at $35 hr but it is ok for a CEO to make $20 million?
I would say that Republicans hate America as much as Obama supporters.
Obama supporters are middle class Americans. Republicans hate poor people and middle class people. Why else would they suggest that a line worker makes too much at $35 hr but it is ok for a CEO to make $20 million?
So, we sort of resent it when rich people who got a big tax break over the last 8 years cry because Obama's going to take it away.
It was you guys who wanted the Iraq war. Well, it's time to start paying for it. Or did you think you would never have to pay for it?
I can never get a Republican to answer that. When do they want to pay for Iraq?
Obama supporters are members of the Democrat Party and they are now the party of the rich. I guess you missed the memo.
And the deal about the Iraq war... I never wanted it and now Obama is ramping up the war in Afghanistan. I can bet at least 35,000 troops will remain in Iraq until at least 2012. It's Obama's war now.
You didn't link what was asserted. Your inability to operate in a civil, intelligent manner and need to resort to profanity and name-calling shows your complete lack of intelligence. Your insistence on lumping me in with Republicans or conservatives shows your complete ignorance. You have shown nothing, proven nothing, and have failed to back your strawman, regurgitated assertion.You don't know what my "side" is, this is why I asked you earlier if you were assuming facts not in evidence. You are.people on your side
Bumping a thread isn't the same as linking specifics, but I guess you know that too.
You said: Find where anyone ever said or wrote that, link it here to back your assertion, or just admit it's a regurgitated strawman talking point and let it go.
And I showed you, you little cock sucker. Now shut the fuck up! Straw man. What a pussy you must be.
Obama supporters are middle class Americans. Republicans hate poor people and middle class people. Why else would they suggest that a line worker makes too much at $35 hr but it is ok for a CEO to make $20 million?
So, we sort of resent it when rich people who got a big tax break over the last 8 years cry because Obama's going to take it away.
It was you guys who wanted the Iraq war. Well, it's time to start paying for it. Or did you think you would never have to pay for it?
I can never get a Republican to answer that. When do they want to pay for Iraq?
Obama supporters are members of the Democrat Party and they are now the party of the rich. I guess you missed the memo.
And the deal about the Iraq war... I never wanted it and now Obama is ramping up the war in Afghanistan. I can bet at least 35,000 troops will remain in Iraq until at least 2012. It's Obama's war now.
Are you suggesting the Afgan war should not be won/finished?
Bush didn't lie us into Afganistan. He just may have allowed it to happen so he could use it to invade Iraq. But that doesn't give Bin Ladin or the people who hate us a free pass.
And for 6 years Bush let the Taliban train and plot in Pakistan. And he did nothing because they are a soverign country. He should have learned that before he went to Iraq.
Are you as big of a pussy as Bush? What happened to enemy number one, dead or alive. Smoke him out. I am so embarrassed. You republicans should be ashamed of yourselves. And now you want to say Obama owns the war? Lucky for us he isn't an idiot like Bush/McCain. And you.
OMG, now you right wing aholes are going to start second guessing the war on terror? Fuck you all!