Do Libs have anything besides "wingnut", "con", or "Faux News"

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by SwingVoter, Feb 7, 2010.

  1. SwingVoter
    Offline

    SwingVoter VIP Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,246
    Thanks Received:
    123
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Richmond, Virginia
    Ratings:
    +129
    I disagree with Republicans a lot here, but at least we go back and forth on facts. Libs don't seem to come to argument with facts, but rather labels like "wingnut" and regurgitated lines they've picked up from Robert Gibbs or MSNBC.

    Republicans like to hide from facts that show how much better we did under Clinton than under Bush, but Dems seem to just hate facts altogether.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. Truthmatters
    Offline

    Truthmatters BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    80,182
    Thanks Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2,233
    got any facts to prove that?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  3. SwingVoter
    Offline

    SwingVoter VIP Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,246
    Thanks Received:
    123
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Richmond, Virginia
    Ratings:
    +129
    which do you hear more here from Dems - you oppose Obama, so you must be a wingnut teabagger con watching Glenn Beck, or, you oppose Obama, is it because you disagree with his spending proposals?
     
  4. Qball
    Offline

    Qball Corner Pocket

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    536
    Thanks Received:
    82
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    Ratings:
    +99
    While I'd agree with your bottom line, I don't think Republicans like to run from facts. I dislike the idea that matters of politics neatly present themselves as facts, when that's actually pretty rare. There would be no point of debate if the facts were obvious. And it's not really saying much that this country was better off under Clinton than Bush. I think most Republicans would resign to the fact that Bush was ineffective. I don't think he's as bad as liberals make him out to be, but he's not winning any Nobel Peace Prizes for being awesome, either. At the same time, for most of Clinton's term, he answered to a Republican Congress. So it's not all one President and his who deserve blame or criticism.
     
  5. LuckyDan
    Offline

    LuckyDan Sublime

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2009
    Messages:
    2,327
    Thanks Received:
    607
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    The mountains of North Central Texas
    Ratings:
    +609
    Well, there's also racist, sexist, homophobe and AGW denier. Those are pretty cool, too. Oh and hypocrite. And Nazi.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  6. edthecynic
    Offline

    edthecynic Censored for Cynicism

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    26,672
    Thanks Received:
    3,087
    Trophy Points:
    260
    Ratings:
    +5,731
    Yeah, why can't they use loon, kook, Libtard, PMSNBC, N Y Slimes, etc., like the always polite and respectful CON$???? :D
     
  7. Mr.Fitnah
    Offline

    Mr.Fitnah Dreamcrusher

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,480
    Thanks Received:
    2,673
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Paradise.
    Ratings:
    +2,673
    Yeah Beeeeck!!!!!
     
  8. rdean
    Offline

    rdean rddean

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2009
    Messages:
    60,191
    Thanks Received:
    6,903
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    chicago
    Ratings:
    +15,024
    [​IMG]

    Does this help?
     
  9. JiggsCasey
    Offline

    JiggsCasey VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2010
    Messages:
    991
    Thanks Received:
    120
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Ratings:
    +128
    Hating facts. ... now there's some poetic irony if there ever was some. ... The last 28 years of corporate presidents have utterly hid from facts on a daily basis.

    as for more labels, they have a whole bunch more, actually. ... almost as many labels as the FACTS they clobber RW fanatics over the head with on a rather consistent basis:

    let's see, i like:

    Bush League
    Bushie
    Shrub
    28 percenter
    Big Dick and the Gang
    the Cheney administration
    Friedmanists
    Soulless Neocon Cabal
    WMDers
    Boy George
    Curious George
    Boy King
    Fox Snooze
    State Propaganda Network disciples

    on and on and on. ... Good times.
     
    Last edited: Feb 8, 2010
  10. Modbert
    Offline

    Modbert Daydream Believer Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2008
    Messages:
    33,178
    Thanks Received:
    2,957
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +2,962
    OP is obviously trolling, or doesn't actually read any of the threads around here.
     

Share This Page