Do Conservatives Believe In Social Darwinism?

[The Rabbi]

The short answer here is no. Mainly because there is no such thing as social darwinism, outside of progressive fantasies about what conservatives believe. In fact no conservative ever used the term, unless referring to charges made by progressives.
Another myth blown up.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

They believe in Inequality, which they are just fine with accept for bitching night and day about the government, while happily cashing the checks it sends them.

 

[BluesLegend]

They believe in Inequality, which they are just fine with accept for bitching night and day about the government, while happily cashing the checks it sends them.

Are you more or less equal than your fellow Americans I wonder.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The short answer here is no. Mainly because there is no such thing as social darwinism, outside of progressive fantasies about what conservatives believe. In fact no conservative ever used the term, unless referring to charges made by progressives.
Another myth blown up.

So no one in principle supported social Darwinism, even if not by that specific label? Are you sure about that?

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

The short answer here is no. Mainly because there is no such thing as social darwinism, outside of progressive fantasies about what conservatives believe. In fact no conservative ever used the term, unless referring to charges made by progressives.
Another myth blown up.

Darwin was the spiritual father of Karl Marx. Which is why Communists love Darwin and have been determined to spread his lies as truth. What greater insult to God then to convince man he was created in the image of an ape - therein implying that God is an ape! We were made in the image of God - Genesis 1:26 - not apes. Anyone who believes that story deserves to lose their water supply to the sucker fish!

 

[Ravi]

The short answer here is no. Mainly because there is no such thing as social darwinism, outside of progressive fantasies about what conservatives believe. In fact no conservative ever used the term, unless referring to charges made by progressives.
Another myth blown up.

Who are you kidding? Social Darwinism has con written all over it.

Social Darwinism is a modern name given to various theories of society that emerged in the United Kingdom, the United States,[1] and Western Europe in the 1870s, and which sought to apply biological concepts of natural selection and survival of the fittest to sociology and politics.[2][3] Social Darwinists generally argue that the strong should see their wealth and power increase while the weak should see their wealth and power decrease. Different social Darwinists have different views about which groups of people are the strong and the weak, and they also hold different opinions about the precise mechanism that should be used to promote strength and punish weakness. Many such views stress competition between individuals in laissez-faire capitalism, while others motivated ideas of eugenics, racism, imperialism,[4] fascism, Nazism, and struggle between national or racial groups.[5][6]

 

[BlindBoo]

Goddamn Hippies I tells ya!

American Experience . The Richest Man in the World Andrew Carnegie . People Events Herbert Spencer PBS

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

Goddamn Hippies I tells ya!

American Experience . The Richest Man in the World Andrew Carnegie . People Events Herbert Spencer PBS

Meet the richest president in the world - the richest politician in the world, Vladimir Putin ( cannot say biggest thief in the world as that title has got to go to the Roman Catholic Vatican who is sitting on trillions of dollars - that belong to the poor, the widow and the orphan - at this writing).

 

[Statistikhengst]

The short answer here is no. Mainly because there is no such thing as social darwinism, outside of progressive fantasies about what conservatives believe. In fact no conservative ever used the term, unless referring to charges made by progressives.
Another myth blown up.

Define Conservatism, say, in 200 words or less.

Because I see too many disparate types running like rats around here, all claiming to be Conservatives, all quite different from each other.

Please do enlighten us.

 

[Statistikhengst]

The short answer here is no. Mainly because there is no such thing as social darwinism, outside of progressive fantasies about what conservatives believe. In fact no conservative ever used the term, unless referring to charges made by progressives.
Another myth blown up.

Darwin was the spiritual father of Karl Marx. Which is why Communists love Darwin and have been determined to spread his lies as truth. What greater insult to God then to convince man he was created in the image of an ape - therein implying that God is an ape! We were made in the image of God - Genesis 1:26 - not apes. Anyone who believes that story deserves to lose their water supply to the sucker fish!

Links!!!

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

The short answer here is no. Mainly because there is no such thing as social darwinism, outside of progressive fantasies about what conservatives believe. In fact no conservative ever used the term, unless referring to charges made by progressives.
Another myth blown up.

Darwin was the spiritual father of Karl Marx. Which is why Communists love Darwin and have been determined to spread his lies as truth. What greater insult to God then to convince man he was created in the image of an ape - therein implying that God is an ape! We were made in the image of God - Genesis 1:26 - not apes. Anyone who believes that story deserves to lose their water supply to the sucker fish!

Links!!!

The short answer here is no. Mainly because there is no such thing as social darwinism, outside of progressive fantasies about what conservatives believe. In fact no conservative ever used the term, unless referring to charges made by progressives.
Another myth blown up.

Darwin was the spiritual father of Karl Marx. Which is why Communists love Darwin and have been determined to spread his lies as truth. What greater insult to God then to convince man he was created in the image of an ape - therein implying that God is an ape! We were made in the image of God - Genesis 1:26 - not apes. Anyone who believes that story deserves to lose their water supply to the sucker fish!

Links!!!

Thomas Nelson Bibles

I prefer the KJV but take your pick. Look up Genesis 1:26.

 

[Asclepias]

These are all conservatives. You know the type.

 

[Statistikhengst]

The short answer here is no. Mainly because there is no such thing as social darwinism, outside of progressive fantasies about what conservatives believe. In fact no conservative ever used the term, unless referring to charges made by progressives.
Another myth blown up.

Darwin was the spiritual father of Karl Marx. Which is why Communists love Darwin and have been determined to spread his lies as truth. What greater insult to God then to convince man he was created in the image of an ape - therein implying that God is an ape! We were made in the image of God - Genesis 1:26 - not apes. Anyone who believes that story deserves to lose their water supply to the sucker fish!

Links!!!

The short answer here is no. Mainly because there is no such thing as social darwinism, outside of progressive fantasies about what conservatives believe. In fact no conservative ever used the term, unless referring to charges made by progressives.
Another myth blown up.

Darwin was the spiritual father of Karl Marx. Which is why Communists love Darwin and have been determined to spread his lies as truth. What greater insult to God then to convince man he was created in the image of an ape - therein implying that God is an ape! We were made in the image of God - Genesis 1:26 - not apes. Anyone who believes that story deserves to lose their water supply to the sucker fish!

Links!!!

Thomas Nelson Bibles

I prefer the KJV but take your pick. Look up Genesis 1:26.

The Bible tells you that in specific, Darwin is the spiritual father of Karl Marx?

 

[Carib Gyal]

That Jewish fella Epstein, Bill Clinton's buddy, is doing pretty good.

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

That Jewish fella Epstein, Bill Clinton's buddy, is doing pretty good.

What will it profit him to gain the whole world only to lose his own soul? Epstein is a fool. ( So are Bill and Hillary Clinton )

 

[Katzndogz]

Equality does not exist in a natural state. Equality and freedom cannot exist together. Equality must always be imposed by force.

 

[Asclepias]

Equality does not exist in a natural state. Equality and freedom cannot exist together. Equality must always be imposed by force.

Thats because you dont know what equality means either literally or by the laws of nature. Equality definitely exists in a natural state. Inequality has to be imposed by force.

 

[Kosh]

The short answer here is no. Mainly because there is no such thing as social darwinism, outside of progressive fantasies about what conservatives believe. In fact no conservative ever used the term, unless referring to charges made by progressives.
Another myth blown up.

Define Conservatism, say, in 200 words or less.

Because I see too many disparate types running like rats around here, all claiming to be Conservatives, all quite different from each other.

Please do enlighten us.

Yes please enlighten the far left drones as they have no idea what that term means.

No seriously they do not know anything beyond their far left programming..

 

[Kosh]

The short answer here is no. Mainly because there is no such thing as social darwinism, outside of progressive fantasies about what conservatives believe. In fact no conservative ever used the term, unless referring to charges made by progressives.
Another myth blown up.

Darwin was the spiritual father of Karl Marx. Which is why Communists love Darwin and have been determined to spread his lies as truth. What greater insult to God then to convince man he was created in the image of an ape - therein implying that God is an ape! We were made in the image of God - Genesis 1:26 - not apes. Anyone who believes that story deserves to lose their water supply to the sucker fish!

Links!!!

Did not show up in the far left blog sites?

The term "Social Darwinism" was used infrequently from around the 1890s, but became popular as a derogatory term in the 1940s when used by Richard Hofstadter to attack the laissez-faire conservatism of those like William Graham Sumner who opposed reform and socialism. Since then it has been used as a term of abuse by those opposed to what they think are the moral consequences of evolution.

Charles Darwin - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

 

[BULLDOG]

The short answer here is no. Mainly because there is no such thing as social darwinism, outside of progressive fantasies about what conservatives believe. In fact no conservative ever used the term, unless referring to charges made by progressives.
Another myth blown up.

Define Conservatism, say, in 200 words or less.

Because I see too many disparate types running like rats around here, all claiming to be Conservatives, all quite different from each other.

Please do enlighten us.

They are all the same. The only difference is which particular crazy idea they advocate more. All republicans who are ashamed to admit it.