Science doesn't do proof, it does evidence. Got any?Actually, there are different ways of knowing things. Proving something scientifically is just one way.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Science doesn't do proof, it does evidence. Got any?Actually, there are different ways of knowing things. Proving something scientifically is just one way.
Do you believe it is logical to believe that everything in life must be perfect for a creator to exist?
No
I just don't believe in magic
Neither do I.
Although it is funny that that is probably the only thing that would convince you that there is a Creator.
Thanks for agreeing with me that it is not logical for Taz to believe that everything in life must be perfect for a Creator to exist.
Who created the creator?
That question is based on a false assumption, and shows a total misunderstanding of what God is. God is the uncaused First Cause. God is eternal.
If you didn't have straw men small enough to beat up you'd have nothingIgnorant statement. And kind of funny, since you’re [Rightwinger] the one who believes that everything in existence, all that is seen and unseen, including the order, beauty, complexity and everything there is just happened to create itself by dumb luck. Now THAT is magic.
Science doesn't do proof, it does evidence. Got any?Actually, there are different ways of knowing things. Proving something scientifically is just one way.
How small do you have to make a strawman before you're able to beat it up?I’ve even heard some nonbelievers admit that, so if you can refute it, go right ahead.
Evidence is that which can be shown. You've shown nothing but an ability to build strawmen.There are many things. Logic, for one.
That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.
Evidence is that which can be shown. You've shown nothing but an ability to build strawmen.There are many things. Logic, for one.
Ffs. Just how obtuse are you? I'm saying it is that which can be shown. Can you not read?Are you claiming that evidence has to be physical?
Ffs. Just how obtuse are you? I'm saying it is that which can be shown. Can you not read?Are you claiming that evidence has to be physical?
.Do atheists believe that everything in life must be perfect for a Creator to exist?
I kind of think they do believe that. What do you say?
Do atheists believe that everything in life must be perfect for a Creator to exist?
I kind of think they do believe that. What do you say?
And I love how you completely ignored my post except for the very first sentence, while accusing me of not reading. If you would’ve kept reading, you would’ve had your answer.Ffs. Just how obtuse are you? I'm saying it is that which can be shown. Can you not read?Are you claiming that evidence has to be physical?
Show some logic.why don’t you make your point, and clearly this time.
No
Just that a magic fairy who makes everything is silly
You showed no evidence for any of your further assertions, thus they were ignored.And I love how you completely ignored my post except for the very first sentence, while accusing me of not reading. If you would’ve kept reading, you would’ve had your answer.
OK, apparently you’re simply not understanding what I’ve been saying. This has nothing to do with me. I am saying that logic itself – the objective laws of logic – are evidence for God. Why, because a universe of rocks and dirt, with no intelligence guiding anything, does not account for the abstract but very real laws of logic.Show some logic.why don’t you make your point, and clearly this time.
Do atheists believe that everything in life must be perfect for a Creator to exist?
I kind of think they do believe that. What do you say?
You showed no evidence for any of your further assertions, thus they were ignored.And I love how you completely ignored my post except for the very first sentence, while accusing me of not reading. If you would’ve kept reading, you would’ve had your answer.
Absolutely. Bullshit for which you provide no evidence.Now you are free to agree or disagree, but I hope that you at least understand what I’ve been saying.
Mutterings about 'objective morality' for one. Morals are community norms. Morals are shown to be valid when they assist the survival of the community. This is demonstrated by how different communities have different morals.I don’t think you even know what my assertions were.