Divorced From Reality.......Wedded To Their Lies....That's What We Keep Seeing In The Media

mudwhistle

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Jul 21, 2009
131,215
67,368
2,645
Headmaster's Office, Hogwarts
Right now there are two trials evolving justifiable homicides.

One is the Kyle Rittenhouse Trial......and this other Arbery Trial.

Weird how both of them were scheduled so close together.
I think the left is planning riots for Thanksgiving.

Both trials are a case of self-defense because the so-called victim attacked the person carrying a legal weapon. If you ask the media.....no weapon should be legal. Everyone has the right to defend themselves when attacked.

But the media doesn't see it that way. Even though the 17 year old Kyle Rittenhouse was attacked by no less than 4 adult White male anarchists in the middle of a riot....the media decided that Rittenhouse was some White Supremacist toting a gun. The meaning of White Supremacist has been used on anyone and everyone who opposes the lies that the MSM is pumping out to the public on CNN and MSNBC.

The Arbery trial involves a black male who was caught burglarizing a construction site by a former police officer. He attempted to evade capture and the media called him a jogger who was minding his own business....just jogging along and these two white males started hassling him for no reason. When the cop confronted the perp....the perp jumped the cop and tried to take his gun....and was shot to death.

Neither of these cases should have ever gone to trial....because both were a clear case of self-defense. At best there should have been hearings....but no indictments. Both had video evidence of the assaults and both showed that the defendant was the victim....not the other way around.

This media provided video calls the escaping perp a "Jogger".
The media assumes, like in the Rittenhouse trial, that bringing a gun removes your right of self-defense.



Rittenhouse didn't run anyone down.....it was the opposite. Rosembaum was the attacker.....as were the other assailants were shot later. One knocked his hat off with a rock....another kicked him in the face while Rittenhouse was on the ground.....another hit him twice with a skateboard.....and another was trying to take his gun while pulling out a pistol to shoot Rittenhouse with. The video shows all of this. It's an open and shut case.....but right now jurors are deciding whether or not to send Kyle Rittenhouse to prison for the rest of his life.




 
Last edited:
Right now there are two trials evolving justifiable homicides.

One is the Kyle Rittenhouse Trial......and this other Arbery Trial.

Weird how both of them were scheduled so close together.
I think the left is planning rights for Thanksgiving.

Both trials are a case of self-defense because the so-called victim attacked the person carrying a legal weapon. If you ask the media.....no weapon should be legal. Everyone has the right to defend themselves when attacked.

But the media doesn't see it that way. Even though the 17 year old Kyle Rittenhouse was attacked by no less than 4 adult White male anarchists in the middle of a riot....the media decided that Rittenhouse was some White Supremacist toting a gun. The meaning of White Supremacist has been used on anyone and everyone who opposes the lies that the MSM is pumping out to the public on CNN and MSNBC.

The Arbery trial involves a black male who was caught burglarizing a construction site by a former police officer. He attempted to evade capture and the media called him a jogger who was minding his own business....just jogging along and these two white males started hassling him for no reason. When the cop confronted the perp....the perp jumped the cop and tried to take his gun....and was shot to death.

Neither of these cases should have ever gone to trial....because both were a clear case of self-defense. At best there should have been hearings....but no indictments. Both had video evidence of the assaults and both showed that the defendant was the victim....not the other way around.

This media provided video calls the escaping perp a "Jogger".
The media assumes, like in the Rittenhouse trial, that bringing a gun removes your right of self-defense.



Rittenhouse didn't run anyone down.....it was the opposite. Rosembaum was the attacker.....as were the other assailants were shot later. One knocked his hat off with a rock....another kicked him in the face while Rittenhouse was on the ground.....another hit him twice with a skateboard.....and another was trying to take his gun while pulling out a pistol to shoot Rittenhouse with. The video shows all of this. It's an open and shut case.....but right now jurors are deciding whether or not to send Kyle Rittenhouse to prison for the rest of his life.





The Arbery trial involves a black male who was caught burglarizing a construction site by a former police officer.

burglarizing?

got a list of the items HE stole?
 
Right now there are two trials evolving justifiable homicides.

One is the Kyle Rittenhouse Trial......and this other Arbery Trial.

Weird how both of them were scheduled so close together.
I think the left is planning rights for Thanksgiving.

Both trials are a case of self-defense because the so-called victim attacked the person carrying a legal weapon. If you ask the media.....no weapon should be legal. Everyone has the right to defend themselves when attacked.

But the media doesn't see it that way. Even though the 17 year old Kyle Rittenhouse was attacked by no less than 4 adult White male anarchists in the middle of a riot....the media decided that Rittenhouse was some White Supremacist toting a gun. The meaning of White Supremacist has been used on anyone and everyone who opposes the lies that the MSM is pumping out to the public on CNN and MSNBC.

The Arbery trial involves a black male who was caught burglarizing a construction site by a former police officer. He attempted to evade capture and the media called him a jogger who was minding his own business....just jogging along and these two white males started hassling him for no reason. When the cop confronted the perp....the perp jumped the cop and tried to take his gun....and was shot to death.

Neither of these cases should have ever gone to trial....because both were a clear case of self-defense. At best there should have been hearings....but no indictments. Both had video evidence of the assaults and both showed that the defendant was the victim....not the other way around.

This media provided video calls the escaping perp a "Jogger".
The media assumes, like in the Rittenhouse trial, that bringing a gun removes your right of self-defense.



Rittenhouse didn't run anyone down.....it was the opposite. Rosembaum was the attacker.....as were the other assailants were shot later. One knocked his hat off with a rock....another kicked him in the face while Rittenhouse was on the ground.....another hit him twice with a skateboard.....and another was trying to take his gun while pulling out a pistol to shoot Rittenhouse with. The video shows all of this. It's an open and shut case.....but right now jurors are deciding whether or not to send Kyle Rittenhouse to prison for the rest of his life.









"American Thinker" is a poor source. The story is half true at best.

Can you find the story on Fox News? Fox News has real reporters, real editors and a reputation to protect.
 
Right now there are two trials evolving justifiable homicides.

One is the Kyle Rittenhouse Trial......and this other Arbery Trial.

Weird how both of them were scheduled so close together.
I think the left is planning rights for Thanksgiving.

Both trials are a case of self-defense because the so-called victim attacked the person carrying a legal weapon. If you ask the media.....no weapon should be legal. Everyone has the right to defend themselves when attacked.

But the media doesn't see it that way. Even though the 17 year old Kyle Rittenhouse was attacked by no less than 4 adult White male anarchists in the middle of a riot....the media decided that Rittenhouse was some White Supremacist toting a gun. The meaning of White Supremacist has been used on anyone and everyone who opposes the lies that the MSM is pumping out to the public on CNN and MSNBC.

The Arbery trial involves a black male who was caught burglarizing a construction site by a former police officer. He attempted to evade capture and the media called him a jogger who was minding his own business....just jogging along and these two white males started hassling him for no reason. When the cop confronted the perp....the perp jumped the cop and tried to take his gun....and was shot to death.

Neither of these cases should have ever gone to trial....because both were a clear case of self-defense. At best there should have been hearings....but no indictments. Both had video evidence of the assaults and both showed that the defendant was the victim....not the other way around.

This media provided video calls the escaping perp a "Jogger".
The media assumes, like in the Rittenhouse trial, that bringing a gun removes your right of self-defense.



Rittenhouse didn't run anyone down.....it was the opposite. Rosembaum was the attacker.....as were the other assailants were shot later. One knocked his hat off with a rock....another kicked him in the face while Rittenhouse was on the ground.....another hit him twice with a skateboard.....and another was trying to take his gun while pulling out a pistol to shoot Rittenhouse with. The video shows all of this. It's an open and shut case.....but right now jurors are deciding whether or not to send Kyle Rittenhouse to prison for the rest of his life.





Rittenhouse just needed to be defending the Capital with his gun and he would have been declared a hero no matter how many people were gunned down and they could even be unarmed.

Otherwise, such activity is strictly prohibited.
 
ANY time.

Got ANY proof he ever took anything from the building?
There had been reports of someone matching his description trespassing on the property,as well as several breakins and thefts from vehicles in the neighborhood. Someone breaking into a new construction would normally arouse suspicion from neighborhood watch. Then he takes off running, this being probable cause that a crime had been committed.

He didn't have to take anything to have committed a crime.

 


"American Thinker" is a poor source. The story is half true at best.

Can you find the story on Fox News? Fox News has real reporters, real editors and a reputation to protect.
American Thinker was only one source.......most of the OP used videos not from American Thinker or Fox News.
 
Right now there are two trials evolving justifiable homicides.

One is the Kyle Rittenhouse Trial......and this other Arbery Trial.

Weird how both of them were scheduled so close together.
I think the left is planning rights for Thanksgiving.

Both trials are a case of self-defense because the so-called victim attacked the person carrying a legal weapon. If you ask the media.....no weapon should be legal. Everyone has the right to defend themselves when attacked.

But the media doesn't see it that way. Even though the 17 year old Kyle Rittenhouse was attacked by no less than 4 adult White male anarchists in the middle of a riot....the media decided that Rittenhouse was some White Supremacist toting a gun. The meaning of White Supremacist has been used on anyone and everyone who opposes the lies that the MSM is pumping out to the public on CNN and MSNBC.

The Arbery trial involves a black male who was caught burglarizing a construction site by a former police officer. He attempted to evade capture and the media called him a jogger who was minding his own business....just jogging along and these two white males started hassling him for no reason. When the cop confronted the perp....the perp jumped the cop and tried to take his gun....and was shot to death.

Neither of these cases should have ever gone to trial....because both were a clear case of self-defense. At best there should have been hearings....but no indictments. Both had video evidence of the assaults and both showed that the defendant was the victim....not the other way around.

This media provided video calls the escaping perp a "Jogger".
The media assumes, like in the Rittenhouse trial, that bringing a gun removes your right of self-defense.



Rittenhouse didn't run anyone down.....it was the opposite. Rosembaum was the attacker.....as were the other assailants were shot later. One knocked his hat off with a rock....another kicked him in the face while Rittenhouse was on the ground.....another hit him twice with a skateboard.....and another was trying to take his gun while pulling out a pistol to shoot Rittenhouse with. The video shows all of this. It's an open and shut case.....but right now jurors are deciding whether or not to send Kyle Rittenhouse to prison for the rest of his life.





WOw. I can't argue with you. You certainly are divorced from reality.
 
There had been reports of someone matching his description trespassing on the property,as well as several breakins and thefts from vehicles in the neighborhood. Someone breaking into a new construction would normally arouse suspicion from neighborhood watch. Then he takes off running, this being probable cause that a crime had been committed.

He didn't have to take anything to have committed a crime.

There had been reports of someone matching his description trespassing on the property,as well as several breakins and thefts from vehicles in the neighborhood.

"matching his description?

I thought they had photos from a camera system. No pictures of him walking out with an armload of property?

Then he takes off running, this being probable cause that a crime had been committed.
He was jogging BEFORE he got to the house, he continued jogging AFTER he left the house.

He didn't have to take anything to have committed a crime.

Trespassing is good reason to hunt someone down and kill them?
 
"matching his description?

I thought they had photos from a camera system. No pictures of him walking out with an armload of property?


He was jogging BEFORE he got to the house, he continued jogging AFTER he left the house.



Trespassing is good reason to hunt someone down and kill them?
No....assaulting and trying to take someone's weapon away and use it on them.....that's a pretty good reason.

Oh....and how many Homeless people do you know that jog.
 
"matching his description?

I thought they had photos from a camera system. No pictures of him walking out with an armload of property?


He was jogging BEFORE he got to the house, he continued jogging AFTER he left the house.



Trespassing is good reason to hunt someone down and kill them?
Oh....I know....you're one of those folks that thinks you have to wait till a perp gets in a few licks before you can start defending yourself.
 
No....assaulting and trying to take someone's weapon away and use it on them.....that's a pretty good reason.

Oh....and how many Homeless people do you know that jog.
No....assaulting and trying to take someone's weapon away and use it on them

And you know he was going to use it on his attackers because?

Oh....and how many Homeless people

He was homeless?

Odd I can't find anything to back that up.
 
And you know he was going to use it on his attackers because?



He was homeless?

Odd I can't find anything to back that up.
Probably because you didn't care to look.
And trying to take away someone's gun means you fully intend on using it against them.

I assume you've never been in combat before....or been held up like I have.
Attacking someone carrying a loaded weapon is stupid.
 
Looks to me like Arbery ran up to the defendant....tried to sneak up on him by going around the truck......and attacked him....was hitting him in the head with one hand and holding onto the gun in the other hand.

 
Probably because you didn't care to look.
And trying to take away someone's gun means you fully intend on using it against them.

I assume you've never been in combat before....or been held up like I have.
Attacking someone carrying a loaded weapon is stupid.
Probably because you didn't care to look.
You know me better than that.

And trying to take away someone's gun means you fully intend on using it against them.

Or it means he was trying to keep from being shot.
 

Forum List

Back
Top