Disgraceful: San Jose Police Chief says they tolerated violent mob to avoid inciting violence!!!???

Nah some conservative nutjob probably will. Unless you don't tell anybody you have a questionable allegiance to the country. My advice... keep your mouth shut.
If I wanted your opinion I would give it to you.

Ha ha. We're dual citizens able to live anywhere in the civilized world without getting our backs wet or dealing with immigration, not a bunch of Muslims escaping hell-holes on rickety boats.
 
I'd be fine with allowing this shit, but the rule needs to be out there; if we can assault people then we shouldn't face any legal retribution for it. Maybe we can put /all/ the violent fucks down at the same time and return this country to stable non-violent types.

I'll hire body guards and bullet proof my vehicles no problem.

Absolutely. Make it the new rule. All police will stand down and if the Democrat mobs incite riots and begin assaulting Republican voters....we can fight back with immunity from charges.

I'd be fine with it.
Great idea let's allow open warfare in the streets :thup:
what do you think your fellow leftist are trying to do, well actually, are doing?
 
So the new improved Democrat way of providing police protection is ....
If the Mayor and commissioner don't agree with your politics you are on your own.
If stepping in and trying to stop violence pisses the agitators off and makes them feel bad about themselves the police will walk away and good luck to ya!....

If this where we are now?
 
So the new improved Democrat way of providing police protection is ....
If the Mayor and commissioner don't agree with your politics you are on your own.
If stepping in and trying to stop violence pisses the agitators off and makes them feel bad about themselves the police will walk away and good luck to ya!....

If this where we are now?

This is EXACTLY why I say liberals don't belong in power. They cannot be trusted with any armed uniformed force. We see leftist mayors telling their police to stand down as thugs riot and assault.

Picture these leftists rioters....if they had uniforms and guns??! That's the way the mass slaughters of communism have happened in the past.
 
I wish every millennial who thinks Bernie is AWSUM because Free Stuff, would read this:


Nikolai Bukharin was executed by shooting in Moscow on March 15, 1938. He had been revered as a giant of the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, as one who even worked side by side with Vladimir Lenin himself. Alas, Bukharin’s Marxist chickens had come home to roost by the time he was shot like a dog during Josef Stalin’s reign of terror. His execution marked the pinnacle of Stalin’s show trials of high-level officials.

You see, Bukharin invested in building a political system that inevitably puts the reins of power into the hands of just a few strongmen who end up calling all the shots. It’s a system in which suspicion and the smell of treason tend to hang in the air.

Socialism, by the way, is just such a system. This is the case whether you call it by any other name, whether communism, utopianism, or collectivism. Oh, go ahead and slap some lipstick on that pig and call it “democratic” socialism or “progressivism” or “communitarianism.”

Lenin and his gang all started out calling themselves socialists. Social democrats, to be exact. So the fact remains: the path of socialism is ultimately paved with coercion, censorship, and, yes, terror. Does stating this make me an alarmist? No. It makes me a realist....

Socialism’s Bloody History Shows Millennials Should Think Twice Before Supporting It
 
Last edited:
It seems egg woman was insulting the protesters and flipping the middle finger at them. A typically classy Trump gal.

dt.common.streams.StreamServer.cls


Ugh not a flattering look ma'am


Physical assault is not legally justified by the "Finger".
 
It seems egg woman was insulting the protesters and flipping the middle finger at them. A typically classy Trump gal.

dt.common.streams.StreamServer.cls


Ugh not a flattering look ma'am

You have a link or is that your say?

If she did what you claimed, I still don't see that free speech is a reason to physically assault another.
 
I'd be fine with allowing this shit, but the rule needs to be out there; if we can assault people then we shouldn't face any legal retribution for it. Maybe we can put /all/ the violent fucks down at the same time and return this country to stable non-violent types.

I'll hire body guards and bullet proof my vehicles no problem.

Absolutely. Make it the new rule. All police will stand down and if the Democrat mobs incite riots and begin assaulting Republican voters....we can fight back with immunity from charges.

I'd be fine with it.
Great idea let's allow open warfare in the streets :thup:
One thing we know for sure....Bucky won't be out there.
 
Oof... somebody needs to take a shower

Trump-supporter-egged.jpg
That was totally inappropriate and wrong, wrong, wrong what they did there...and yes, the San Jose police did not do enough to keep the groups apart.


Thank you. Despite the touch of spin there.


Does it bother you that so many on your side are supporting this violence?
How many is "so many"? That's a rather vague term.


The mayor of the city, several on the thread. It is unlikly that they are the only ones, and far more likely they are representative of a percentage of the Left.
 
Oof... somebody needs to take a shower

Trump-supporter-egged.jpg
That was totally inappropriate and wrong, wrong, wrong what they did there...and yes, the San Jose police did not do enough to keep the groups apart.


Thank you. Despite the touch of spin there.


Does it bother you that so many on your side are supporting this violence?
How many is "so many"? That's a rather vague term.


The mayor of the city, several on the thread. It is unlikly that they are the only ones, and far more likely they are representative of a percentage of the Left.
They SUPPORTED the violence?
 
Interesting note. The 1968 riots in Chicago cost the Democrats the election. Keep up the good work morons. These rioters of whom a good many are illegals sporting the Mexican flag and burning the American flag may well cost the democrats this election too.
 
What he was saying is that the attacks weren't that bad and no one was in peril.

No innocent people will be protected. How many were attacked by protesters at the Rolling Thunder event? Yeah, that's what it takes.

He's saying simple assaults will be allowed. Punch or throw shit at all the Republican voters you wont....police won't be defending you. At least not the ones under the command of a Democrat mayor.

And it will be allowed....because the 250 riot cops watching innocent people being attacked "don't wanna incite violence".


Fucking gas em. CS canisters on the inside. OC canisters on the outside. Fog those liberal cockroaches out.
Fucking gas em. CS canisters on the inside. OC canisters on the outside. Fog the feral cracka cockroaches out. finish off what General Sherman didn't complete :coffee:
 
I'd be fine with allowing this shit, but the rule needs to be out there; if we can assault people then we shouldn't face any legal retribution for it. Maybe we can put /all/ the violent fucks down at the same time and return this country to stable non-violent types.

I'll hire body guards and bullet proof my vehicles no problem.

Absolutely. Make it the new rule. All police will stand down and if the Democrat mobs incite riots and begin assaulting Republican voters....we can fight back with immunity from charges.

I'd be fine with it.
Great idea let's allow open warfare in the streets :thup:
One thing we know for sure....Bucky won't be out there.

No I wont. I don't loiter in liberal shitholes anymore. Too smart for that.
 

Forum List

Back
Top