Gunny
Gold Member
Powerman said:Not testable according to your limited understanding of science perhaps. But there are tests and observations that you can make to lead you to different conclusions. Obviously we can't go back in time. Think of it as forensic science. At least you have something to work with. Invoking a supernatural being in your theory is just sillyness. It's not science. The big bang is science. For example we know that the universe expanded because it's still expanding and we can observe that. We can also observe different radiation levels and such. With ID there is absolutely nothing to observe or test so it isn't science. How difficult is that to understand?
LMAO. It doesn't even matter WHAT board I'm on, the anti-religion attack is always the same ..... anyone who disagrees is ignorant. Seems to me the one who isn;t understanding is the one blindly believing what he wants to hear and refusing to acknowledge the flaws in his argument.
The "Big Bang" is no less "silly" than a supernatural being. GMAFB. Out of absolute nothingness, something comes. Excellent reasoning.
The theory itself is NOT hard to understand. The credence you place on whimsy is. The fact that you continually ridicule ID as nonsense while at the same time spouting off something no more or less nonsensical is all the evidence required in this test to prove that you possess little to no objectivity on the topic.
And until you can produce some hard evidence that proves any scientific theory of origin, they are no more nor less scientific than ID and my statement stands.