Si modo
Diamond Member
Arrhenius is known as a chemist, bozo.I read this early today, and thought I'd add in that a big difference between Evolution and AGW is a matter of ego.
If you exam relativity, theories on celestial motion, germ theories, or namely any other theory in science you'll find that the theory seeks to understand some underlying physical law. Mankind (Or God) isn't really the focus.
Global Warming theories seem to take a different track. The underlying theme seems to be that after noticing that temperatures were on an up-tick, the early adopters automatically assumed that mankind was the cause. That seems to require a certain amount of....ego... about mankind's power and place on the planet that other theories seem to lack, to their benefit.
I think Mankind does have the power to affect the environment, but the extent that global warming theorists claim smacks of a certain humanistic egotism that sits uncomfortably with me.
I thought that you had more knowledge of science that this. The physics of GHGs were established by Tyndal and Arrnhenius.
And that (mechanism) has what to do with determining the significance and magnitude of man-made CO2 on any global warming?