Dimwinger Steny Hoyer ignorant of the Constitution...Trump should prove his innocence.

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Nostra, Jan 19, 2020.

  1. Nostra
    Offline

    Nostra Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2019
    Messages:
    5,880
    Thanks Received:
    990
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Ratings:
    +6,374
    This blithering idiot said Trump will have the opportunity to prove his innocence.

    Hey moron, it's on you and your ilk to prove he is guilty, which you have failed miserably to do. He doesn't need to prove anything.


    Doug Collins: House Democratic leader's remark about letting Trump 'prove innocence' should alarm Americans
    By Charles Creitz | Fox News


    Hoyer, the number-two Democrat in the House, defended the House's impeachment inquiry last month by remarking that Trump was afforded "every opportunity to prove his innocence."

    Collins told host Mark Levin that no American has to prove their innocence -- in fact, the burden of proof falls on the opposite party.

    "Mr. Hoyer from Maryland ... made a very revealing statement for anybody who's concerned about Constitutional rights -- and especially for me -- even those of my Democratic counterparts who worry about their communities, where they discuss police action and rights being violated," he said.

    "It's amazing to me how they're willingly setting that aside to come up to this -- Steny Hoyer actually said 'we allowed him every opportunity to come prove his innocence,'."

    Collins said the comment was mindblowing in that it seemed that Congress must have "taken a vacation and le[ft] the United States."

    Doug Collins: House Democratic leader's remark about letting Trump 'prove innocence' should alarm Americans
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  2. rightwinger
    Offline

    rightwinger Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    198,795
    Thanks Received:
    28,370
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Ratings:
    +106,135
    You don’t understand how trials work do you?

    Both sides get to provide evidence on their behalf. Trump does not have to say anything but is provided an opportunity to provide his own evidence and defense
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  3. Nostra
    Offline

    Nostra Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2019
    Messages:
    5,880
    Thanks Received:
    990
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Ratings:
    +6,374
    Another moron who hasn't read the Constitution.:21:

    BTW, love the sig. Not many people admit publicly that anyone who agrees with them are wrong.
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. Crepitus
    Offline

    Crepitus Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2018
    Messages:
    28,081
    Thanks Received:
    2,196
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +19,159
    Lol, poor little tRumpling doesn't understand what a trial.is.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  5. rightwinger
    Offline

    rightwinger Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    198,795
    Thanks Received:
    28,370
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Ratings:
    +106,135
    If I agreed with what you said....we would both be wrong wouldn’t we?
     
  6. Nostra
    Offline

    Nostra Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2019
    Messages:
    5,880
    Thanks Received:
    990
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Ratings:
    +6,374
    Good thing you don't agree with me..........that proves I'm right.:5_1_12024:
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
  7. Maxdeath
    Offline

    Maxdeath Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2018
    Messages:
    3,610
    Thanks Received:
    766
    Trophy Points:
    275
    Ratings:
    +4,289
    Just amazing how few people actually understand the real world.
    They seem to have never heard the words innocent until proven guilty.
    It is an idea that has been used at diffrent points around the world but actually became normalized in American law in 1884.

    It goes along with the idea that one is presumed innocent until proven guilty.

    It is considered a travesty of justice too assume that someone is guilty before a trial. That is why jury selection takes time in our country is that lawyers and the law do not want those that have already decided the guilt or innocence before the trial begins.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. MACAULAY
    Offline

    MACAULAY Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2013
    Messages:
    4,730
    Thanks Received:
    1,551
    Trophy Points:
    350
    Ratings:
    +7,579
    [​IMG]
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
  9. rightwinger
    Offline

    rightwinger Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    198,795
    Thanks Received:
    28,370
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Ratings:
    +106,135
    If I agreed with your stupid OP...that would make me wrong too
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  10. rightwinger
    Offline

    rightwinger Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    198,795
    Thanks Received:
    28,370
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Ratings:
    +106,135
    Nobody said he was guilty

    Just that he would be able to provide his defense.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1

Share This Page