I'm more into equality than vengeance.
So youre for wealth redistribution then. Thats fine with me but I dont think the education whites need regarding equality would really be learned. I think it would just make them angry everyone was on a equal level. There has to be some pain for the lesson to be accurately understood.
No, not really.
I'm perfectly fine with people making their own money and paying for things with their own money.
Where I'm for socialist policies is with things like health care. Why? Because our bodies aren't cars, they're essential for living. We don't get to choose our body or our health.
The privatized health care in the US doesn't give a shit about people with pre-existing conditions, people born with problems, like health care problems and the Prisons end up taking up the slack.
Look, you take the fact that the US Federal Govt spends MORE on healthcare than the UK govt does (which has a single payer system) and then you add up how much the 50%+ people in US prisons with mental problems cost the country, and you'd realize that actually, a single payer healthcare system would actually be CHEAPER for the people.
But the rich are so fucking selfish, they actually end up spending more to make themselves feel like they're spending less.Go figure, and to make a system that is complete bullshit.
Where the rich really get rich is by A) keeping the poor really poor so they can't earn wages and B) making their kids find it easier to do well by giving them a massive head start because their kids get a better education and because they're walking into corporations which are paying so little in tax they might be being paid by the govt to work.
I'm for equality. I'm for the small guy standing a chance to make it in society because he can make a business that isn't competing against massive odds. I'm for people paying their fair share of taxes.
And how can Republicans say life is precious then not want to treat someone with cancer because they don't have the money.
Republicans really don't care about seeds in the womb. And many pro life mother fuckers don't care about the person dying of cancer who can't afford the treatment. Once the person is walking on two feet fuck them is what Republicans say.
But weird how much they care for them before they are born. They care soooo much about them being born but then don't care after. Maybe they like to see people suffer.
Being anti-abortion (they say pro-life because it's positive) is about being religious and doing what they're told.
Being anti-abortion had logic back in the day when a high percentage of children didn't make it out of childhood. Things have change. The world population is increasing at too high a rate for it to be sustainable. War will come, hunger and famine will come at some point, no matter how clever we think we are.
It's an outdated ideal that they simple don't bother to think about. Religious doesn't like to change, it says "God says this" in order to justify other reasoning, and then when that reasoning changes they can't just say "oh, God told me to change".
They care about their religion more than they care about people, that's for sure.
No...wrong...most of the developed countries are not reproducing enough new humans to replace the ones they are losing......
We are no where near having too many people...not even close.
Maybe not by your standards but I think we are already overpopulated. Just look at global warming. With China, Africa, India, Mexico, Europe, Russia and the Middle East all manufacturing now we are polluting our atmosphere.
Or how about how we are over fishing our oceans?
Or have you heard we are running out of sand? Would you ever have imagined sand would be a valuable commodity? The World is Running Out of Sand | Science | Smithsonian
So I don't know how you can say we aren't over populated. If I go out to the country it would seem we aren't but if I go to any city I'd say we are.
I never understand people who are fine with the population doubling.