Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Well, yes. Many Americans are morons, and fell hard for the fake news about Clinton, even though anyone who wasn't a bedwetting moron instantly saw through it.
Anyways, you lied to the bedwetters and won. Stop whining about it already. Worst sore winner crybabies I ever saw.
Oh, since Democrats were never filibuster-happy anyways, this thread is whining about nothing. The conservatives just can't understand that Democrats have never been as anti-Constitution as they are.
Democrats really did think they would be in power forever. They had demographic change that ensured a Democrat majority forever kept by pandering.What is it about politicians that makes them so short-sighted?Thank you Harry Reid.
(CNN)Senate Democrats are eager to make Donald Trump pay a political price for nominating staunch conservatives to fill out his Cabinet, hoping to exact revenge for the GOP's stubborn opposition to President Barack Obama's nominees.
But there is little they can do about it -- and some top Democrats are now coming to regret it.
That's because Senate Democrats muscled through an unprecedented rules change in 2013 to weaken the power of the minority party to filibuster Cabinet-level appointees and most judicial nominees, now setting the threshold at 51 votes -- rather than 60 -- to overcome tactics aimed at derailing nominations.
With the Senate GOP poised to hold 52 seats next Congress, some Democrats now say they should have thought twice before making the rules change -- known on Capitol Hill as the "nuclear option."
"I do regret that," said Sen. Chris Coons of Delaware, a Democrat who voted for the rules change three years ago. "I frankly think many of us will regret that in this Congress because it would have been a terrific speed bump, potential emergency break, to have in our system to slow down nominees."
They must think that, whenever they're in control, they'll be in control FOREVER. They're just SO damn GOOD.
The Dems over-interpreted their "mandate" (ha ha) and here we are. And no one should be surprised if the GOP does precisely the same thing.
.
Democrats really did think they would be in power forever. They had demographic change that ensured a Democrat majority forever kept by pandering.What is it about politicians that makes them so short-sighted?Thank you Harry Reid.
(CNN)Senate Democrats are eager to make Donald Trump pay a political price for nominating staunch conservatives to fill out his Cabinet, hoping to exact revenge for the GOP's stubborn opposition to President Barack Obama's nominees.
But there is little they can do about it -- and some top Democrats are now coming to regret it.
That's because Senate Democrats muscled through an unprecedented rules change in 2013 to weaken the power of the minority party to filibuster Cabinet-level appointees and most judicial nominees, now setting the threshold at 51 votes -- rather than 60 -- to overcome tactics aimed at derailing nominations.
With the Senate GOP poised to hold 52 seats next Congress, some Democrats now say they should have thought twice before making the rules change -- known on Capitol Hill as the "nuclear option."
"I do regret that," said Sen. Chris Coons of Delaware, a Democrat who voted for the rules change three years ago. "I frankly think many of us will regret that in this Congress because it would have been a terrific speed bump, potential emergency break, to have in our system to slow down nominees."
They must think that, whenever they're in control, they'll be in control FOREVER. They're just SO damn GOOD.
The Dems over-interpreted their "mandate" (ha ha) and here we are. And no one should be surprised if the GOP does precisely the same thing.
.
Had democrats won this time, they would have had it. In four years they would have jammed in millions of non white immigrants.
When you start believing your talking points, you do stupid thingsThank you Harry Reid.
(CNN)Senate Democrats are eager to make Donald Trump pay a political price for nominating staunch conservatives to fill out his Cabinet, hoping to exact revenge for the GOP's stubborn opposition to President Barack Obama's nominees.
But there is little they can do about it -- and some top Democrats are now coming to regret it.
That's because Senate Democrats muscled through an unprecedented rules change in 2013 to weaken the power of the minority party to filibuster Cabinet-level appointees and most judicial nominees, now setting the threshold at 51 votes -- rather than 60 -- to overcome tactics aimed at derailing nominations.
With the Senate GOP poised to hold 52 seats next Congress, some Democrats now say they should have thought twice before making the rules change -- known on Capitol Hill as the "nuclear option."
"I do regret that," said Sen. Chris Coons of Delaware, a Democrat who voted for the rules change three years ago. "I frankly think many of us will regret that in this Congress because it would have been a terrific speed bump, potential emergency break, to have in our system to slow down nominees."
Poor little mamooth here can't even bring herself to admit the monumental failures of her party, even when her party themselves are admitting it.Well, yes. Many Americans are morons, and fell hard for the fake news about Clinton, even though anyone who wasn't a bedwetting moron instantly saw through it.
Anyways, you lied to the bedwetters and won. Stop whining about it already. Worst sore winner crybabies I ever saw.
Oh, since Democrats were never filibuster-happy anyways, this thread is whining about nothing. The conservatives just can't understand that Democrats have never been as anti-Constitution as they are.
Sucks to be a stupid democrat, huh?Well, yes. Many Americans are morons, and fell hard for the fake news about Clinton, even though anyone who wasn't a bedwetting moron instantly saw through it.
Anyways, you lied to the bedwetters and won. Stop whining about it already. Worst sore winner crybabies I ever saw.
Oh, since Democrats were never filibuster-happy anyways, this thread is whining about nothing. The conservatives just can't understand that Democrats have never been as anti-Constitution as they are.
Maybe that's because you were so stupid to proclaim Hitlery Clinton the winner 4 years before she even announced she was going to run, nitwit.P@triot, are you under the impression you're the first weepy loser to cry-stalk me after getting spanked? You're not. I've got a whole string of butthurt stalkers like you following me around.
Keep trying, losers. If you jackals collect yourselves into pack of 20 or so to go against the lion, you could all drown me out simply by the sheer volume of your weeping.
Maybe that's because you were so stupid to proclaim Hitlery
Awwwww.....your Hillary lost....poor snowflake....Maybe that's because you were so stupid to proclaim Hitlery
The election is over, so you don't have to repeat Russian propaganda any more. But you still will, because you're still a commie to your very core.
Now, we do know why you're still crying so hysterically, snowflake.
Your masters told you that if Trump won, everyone would stop laughing at you for being such a weepy failure.
And so Trump won ... and everyone is laughing at you even harder. That's got to sting. Your sanity has clearly taken a beating.
For me, life is good. I get to point to the abject failure of your messiah and party for 4 years and laugh my ass off, and all you'll be able to do about it is cry at me.
That is, unless you report me to the Trump Gestapo. Bet you just can't wait to do that, eh goosestepper? It's your wet dream to have all those awful liberals sent to the camps, as payback for how they humiliated you.
Watching you fall apart over the fact that you can't handle Donald Trump destroying your girl Hitlery in the election is hilarious. Watching you go bat-shit insane over your humiliation of declaring for years that Hitlery would be the next president is creepy. But still funny in away.Maybe that's because you were so stupid to proclaim Hitlery
The election is over, so you don't have to repeat Russian propaganda any more. But you still will, because you're still a commie to your very core.
Now, we do know why you're still crying so hysterically, snowflake.
Your masters told you that if Trump won, everyone would stop laughing at you for being such a weepy failure.
And so Trump won ... and everyone is laughing at you even harder. That's got to sting. Your sanity has clearly taken a beating.
For me, life is good. I get to point to the abject failure of your messiah and party for 4 years and laugh my ass off, and all you'll be able to do about it is cry at me.
That is, unless you report me to the Trump Gestapo. Bet you just can't wait to do that, eh goosestepper? It's your wet dream to have all those awful liberals sent to the camps, as payback for how they humiliated you.
Yep.Thank you Harry Reid.
(CNN)Senate Democrats are eager to make Donald Trump pay a political price for nominating staunch conservatives to fill out his Cabinet, hoping to exact revenge for the GOP's stubborn opposition to President Barack Obama's nominees.
But there is little they can do about it -- and some top Democrats are now coming to regret it.
That's because Senate Democrats muscled through an unprecedented rules change in 2013 to weaken the power of the minority party to filibuster Cabinet-level appointees and most judicial nominees, now setting the threshold at 51 votes -- rather than 60 -- to overcome tactics aimed at derailing nominations.
With the Senate GOP poised to hold 52 seats next Congress, some Democrats now say they should have thought twice before making the rules change -- known on Capitol Hill as the "nuclear option."
"I do regret that," said Sen. Chris Coons of Delaware, a Democrat who voted for the rules change three years ago. "I frankly think many of us will regret that in this Congress because it would have been a terrific speed bump, potential emergency break, to have in our system to slow down nominees."
Goose meet gander
Even more gander, because once the well was opened, Republicans can merely extend the rule to cover supreme court nominees.
Both parties have a tendency to think they'll be in power forever. Under Bush there was talk of the "Permanent Republican Majority." Then Obama inherited all of the expanded Executive powers that Bush and Cheney engineered. Pelosi, Reid, and Obama assumed they'd be in power forever and failed to roll things back. Now Trump has the most powerful Presidency in US history. And in 4-8 years he'll be out too.Democrats really did think they would be in power forever. They had demographic change that ensured a Democrat majority forever kept by pandering.What is it about politicians that makes them so short-sighted?Thank you Harry Reid.
(CNN)Senate Democrats are eager to make Donald Trump pay a political price for nominating staunch conservatives to fill out his Cabinet, hoping to exact revenge for the GOP's stubborn opposition to President Barack Obama's nominees.
But there is little they can do about it -- and some top Democrats are now coming to regret it.
That's because Senate Democrats muscled through an unprecedented rules change in 2013 to weaken the power of the minority party to filibuster Cabinet-level appointees and most judicial nominees, now setting the threshold at 51 votes -- rather than 60 -- to overcome tactics aimed at derailing nominations.
With the Senate GOP poised to hold 52 seats next Congress, some Democrats now say they should have thought twice before making the rules change -- known on Capitol Hill as the "nuclear option."
"I do regret that," said Sen. Chris Coons of Delaware, a Democrat who voted for the rules change three years ago. "I frankly think many of us will regret that in this Congress because it would have been a terrific speed bump, potential emergency break, to have in our system to slow down nominees."
They must think that, whenever they're in control, they'll be in control FOREVER. They're just SO damn GOOD.
The Dems over-interpreted their "mandate" (ha ha) and here we are. And no one should be surprised if the GOP does precisely the same thing.
.
Had democrats won this time, they would have had it. In four years they would have jammed in millions of non white immigrants.
The parties can be counted on to (a) claim a "mandate", and then (b) over-interpret that "mandate" enough to piss people off and get thrown out on their butts.Both parties have a tendency to think they'll be in power forever. Under Bush there was talk of the "Permanent Republican Majority." Then Obama inherited all of the expanded Executive powers that Bush and Cheney engineered. Pelosi, Reid, and Obama assumed they'd be in power forever and failed to roll things back. Now Trump has the most powerful Presidency in US history. And in 4-8 years he'll be out too.Democrats really did think they would be in power forever. They had demographic change that ensured a Democrat majority forever kept by pandering.What is it about politicians that makes them so short-sighted?Thank you Harry Reid.
(CNN)Senate Democrats are eager to make Donald Trump pay a political price for nominating staunch conservatives to fill out his Cabinet, hoping to exact revenge for the GOP's stubborn opposition to President Barack Obama's nominees.
But there is little they can do about it -- and some top Democrats are now coming to regret it.
That's because Senate Democrats muscled through an unprecedented rules change in 2013 to weaken the power of the minority party to filibuster Cabinet-level appointees and most judicial nominees, now setting the threshold at 51 votes -- rather than 60 -- to overcome tactics aimed at derailing nominations.
With the Senate GOP poised to hold 52 seats next Congress, some Democrats now say they should have thought twice before making the rules change -- known on Capitol Hill as the "nuclear option."
"I do regret that," said Sen. Chris Coons of Delaware, a Democrat who voted for the rules change three years ago. "I frankly think many of us will regret that in this Congress because it would have been a terrific speed bump, potential emergency break, to have in our system to slow down nominees."
They must think that, whenever they're in control, they'll be in control FOREVER. They're just SO damn GOOD.
The Dems over-interpreted their "mandate" (ha ha) and here we are. And no one should be surprised if the GOP does precisely the same thing.
.
Had democrats won this time, they would have had it. In four years they would have jammed in millions of non white immigrants.
Maybe that's because you were so stupid to proclaim Hitlery
The election is over, so you don't have to repeat Russian propaganda any more. But you still will, because you're still a commie to your very core.
Now, we do know why you're still crying so hysterically, snowflake.
Your masters told you that if Trump won, everyone would stop laughing at you for being such a weepy failure.
And so Trump won ... and everyone is laughing at you even harder. That's got to sting. Your sanity has clearly taken a beating.
For me, life is good. I get to point to the abject failure of your messiah and party for 4 years and laugh my ass off, and all you'll be able to do about it is cry at me.
That is, unless you report me to the Trump Gestapo. Bet you just can't wait to do that, eh goosestepper? It's your wet dream to have all those awful liberals sent to the camps, as payback for how they humiliated you.
Remember, the next Republican president hadnt been born in Rightwinger's lifetime.Democrats really did think they would be in power forever. They had demographic change that ensured a Democrat majority forever kept by pandering.What is it about politicians that makes them so short-sighted?Thank you Harry Reid.
(CNN)Senate Democrats are eager to make Donald Trump pay a political price for nominating staunch conservatives to fill out his Cabinet, hoping to exact revenge for the GOP's stubborn opposition to President Barack Obama's nominees.
But there is little they can do about it -- and some top Democrats are now coming to regret it.
That's because Senate Democrats muscled through an unprecedented rules change in 2013 to weaken the power of the minority party to filibuster Cabinet-level appointees and most judicial nominees, now setting the threshold at 51 votes -- rather than 60 -- to overcome tactics aimed at derailing nominations.
With the Senate GOP poised to hold 52 seats next Congress, some Democrats now say they should have thought twice before making the rules change -- known on Capitol Hill as the "nuclear option."
"I do regret that," said Sen. Chris Coons of Delaware, a Democrat who voted for the rules change three years ago. "I frankly think many of us will regret that in this Congress because it would have been a terrific speed bump, potential emergency break, to have in our system to slow down nominees."
They must think that, whenever they're in control, they'll be in control FOREVER. They're just SO damn GOOD.
The Dems over-interpreted their "mandate" (ha ha) and here we are. And no one should be surprised if the GOP does precisely the same thing.
.
Had democrats won this time, they would have had it. In four years they would have jammed in millions of non white immigrants.
You're the first group for the concentration camps Trump builds.Maybe that's because you were so stupid to proclaim Hitlery
The election is over, so you don't have to repeat Russian propaganda any more. But you still will, because you're still a commie to your very core.
Now, we do know why you're still crying so hysterically, snowflake.
Your masters told you that if Trump won, everyone would stop laughing at you for being such a weepy failure.
And so Trump won ... and everyone is laughing at you even harder. That's got to sting. Your sanity has clearly taken a beating.
For me, life is good. I get to point to the abject failure of your messiah and party for 4 years and laugh my ass off, and all you'll be able to do about it is cry at me.
That is, unless you report me to the Trump Gestapo. Bet you just can't wait to do that, eh goosestepper? It's your wet dream to have all those awful liberals sent to the camps, as payback for how they humiliated you.
Well the dems have inflicted their agenda on America even without a mandate. Who can forget this? Talk about in your face. This is where the people started getting really pissed at the dems. The majority of Americans were against this abortion of a bill and still are, yet the dems rammed it through behind locked doors and bribed people to vote for it. "WE HAVE TO PASS THE BILL TO FIND OUT WHAT'S IN IT." It was a dark day in the history of American politics that the dems are now living to regret...The parties can be counted on to (a) claim a "mandate", and then (b) over-interpret that "mandate" enough to piss people off and get thrown out on their butts.Both parties have a tendency to think they'll be in power forever. Under Bush there was talk of the "Permanent Republican Majority." Then Obama inherited all of the expanded Executive powers that Bush and Cheney engineered. Pelosi, Reid, and Obama assumed they'd be in power forever and failed to roll things back. Now Trump has the most powerful Presidency in US history. And in 4-8 years he'll be out too.Democrats really did think they would be in power forever. They had demographic change that ensured a Democrat majority forever kept by pandering.What is it about politicians that makes them so short-sighted?Thank you Harry Reid.
(CNN)Senate Democrats are eager to make Donald Trump pay a political price for nominating staunch conservatives to fill out his Cabinet, hoping to exact revenge for the GOP's stubborn opposition to President Barack Obama's nominees.
But there is little they can do about it -- and some top Democrats are now coming to regret it.
That's because Senate Democrats muscled through an unprecedented rules change in 2013 to weaken the power of the minority party to filibuster Cabinet-level appointees and most judicial nominees, now setting the threshold at 51 votes -- rather than 60 -- to overcome tactics aimed at derailing nominations.
With the Senate GOP poised to hold 52 seats next Congress, some Democrats now say they should have thought twice before making the rules change -- known on Capitol Hill as the "nuclear option."
"I do regret that," said Sen. Chris Coons of Delaware, a Democrat who voted for the rules change three years ago. "I frankly think many of us will regret that in this Congress because it would have been a terrific speed bump, potential emergency break, to have in our system to slow down nominees."
They must think that, whenever they're in control, they'll be in control FOREVER. They're just SO damn GOOD.
The Dems over-interpreted their "mandate" (ha ha) and here we are. And no one should be surprised if the GOP does precisely the same thing.
.
Had democrats won this time, they would have had it. In four years they would have jammed in millions of non white immigrants.
The narcissism that infects partisans ideologues both motivates them and beats them.
.
