Dems Demand Copy of Unredacted Mueller Report

[Doc7505]

Dems Demand Copy of Unredacted Mueller Report
​

Dems Demand Copy of Unredacted Mueller Report
5 May 2019 ~ By John Semmens
Despite the fact that the copy of the Special Counsel’s released to the public shows less than 10 percent was redacted and despite the fact that a completely unredacted copy is available for key members of Congress to read (an opportunity no Democrat has yet to seize), Rep. Jerrold Nadler, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, demanded that Attorney General Barr turnover a completely unredacted copy or join him in petitioning the courts to void the law prohibiting grand jury testimony and classified information from being published.
Sen. Dick Durbin seconded Nadler’s remarks and added a demand that Barr “recuse himself from any further involvement connected with any investigations of the heroic government officials who have been covertly working to reverse the monumental error of electing Donald Trump president. He should follow the example set by his predecessor Jeff Sessions, who correctly stepped aside to allow the intelligence community to continue their efforts to save the country from this tyrant. There is no good reason why these patriots should have their livelihoods endangered and their reputations smeared for doing the right thing.”
Barr rejected these demands, pointing out that “my predecessor’s dereliction of duty is not an appropriate model for how an Attorney General should proceed. Whether those who spied on and conspired against candidate, and later president, Trump, thought they were doing the right thing shouldn’t shield them from the consequences of doing illegal things. We will continue to investigate, and if we find evidence that supports the prosecution of any of the individuals involved, those prosecutions will go forward.”
Meanwhile, Late Show host Steven Colbert expressed a desire to “wring the neck” of Barr, citing “the Constitution’s unalienable right of the people to abolish the government and institute a new government more to our liking” as a justification. “Trump and his henchmen are on the verge of undoing the legacy left us by President Obama,” he said. “Surely, this warrants the same sort of extreme action taken by the Founding Fathers to end the tyranny they faced in 1776.”


~~~~~~
A Republican congressman has been quoted stating that there is an unredacted copy available to every congressman to read in the House of Representative’s SCIF. He said that only he and one other Republican has gone in and read it. He stated that NO Dem congressmen/women have taken the time to read it. Thus the Dem’s demand for being given access to an unredacted copy is a total false, they have it.

 

[watchingfromafar]

Trump is a spy and traitor and you know what we do with traitors !!!
And Doc7505 may even be a Russian mole too !!!
just kidding

-

 

[protectionist]

Trump is a spy and traitor and you know what we do with traitors !!!
And Doc7505 may even be a Russian mole too !!!

-

So you have nothing to say about the Democrats ignoring the unredacted copy of the Mueller report, available to every congressman to read in the House of Representative’s SCIF.

Instead, you just jump in here and mouth off, with ad hominem, worthless, emotional outburst.

Typical for Democrats these days. Ho hum. Yawn***

 

[watchingfromafar]

Trump is a spy and traitor and you know what we do with traitors !!!
And Doc7505 may even be a Russian mole too !!!

-

So you have nothing to say about the Democrats ignoring the unredacted copy of the Mueller report, available to every congressman to read in the House of Representative’s SCIF.

Instead, you just jump in here and mouth off, with ad hominem, worthless, emotional outburst.

Typical for Democrats these days. Ho hum. Yawn***

+
Since I know no un-redacted version of the Mueller report is out there it is you mouthing off, with ad hominem, worthless, emotional outburst.

Ok lets get honest here, is Russian your second language or the first-?
just asking
-

 

[The Purge]

Call it Obama's SpyGate!

 

[depotoo]

There is one available for them to read. Only a couple have chosen to. It’s another tall tale.

Dems Demand Copy of Unredacted Mueller Report
​

Dems Demand Copy of Unredacted Mueller Report
5 May 2019 ~ By John Semmens
Despite the fact that the copy of the Special Counsel’s released to the public shows less than 10 percent was redacted and despite the fact that a completely unredacted copy is available for key members of Congress to read (an opportunity no Democrat has yet to seize), Rep. Jerrold Nadler, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, demanded that Attorney General Barr turnover a completely unredacted copy or join him in petitioning the courts to void the law prohibiting grand jury testimony and classified information from being published.
Sen. Dick Durbin seconded Nadler’s remarks and added a demand that Barr “recuse himself from any further involvement connected with any investigations of the heroic government officials who have been covertly working to reverse the monumental error of electing Donald Trump president. He should follow the example set by his predecessor Jeff Sessions, who correctly stepped aside to allow the intelligence community to continue their efforts to save the country from this tyrant. There is no good reason why these patriots should have their livelihoods endangered and their reputations smeared for doing the right thing.”
Barr rejected these demands, pointing out that “my predecessor’s dereliction of duty is not an appropriate model for how an Attorney General should proceed. Whether those who spied on and conspired against candidate, and later president, Trump, thought they were doing the right thing shouldn’t shield them from the consequences of doing illegal things. We will continue to investigate, and if we find evidence that supports the prosecution of any of the individuals involved, those prosecutions will go forward.”
Meanwhile, Late Show host Steven Colbert expressed a desire to “wring the neck” of Barr, citing “the Constitution’s unalienable right of the people to abolish the government and institute a new government more to our liking” as a justification. “Trump and his henchmen are on the verge of undoing the legacy left us by President Obama,” he said. “Surely, this warrants the same sort of extreme action taken by the Founding Fathers to end the tyranny they faced in 1776.”


~~~~~~
A Republican congressman has been quoted stating that there is an unredacted copy available to every congressman to read in the House of Representative’s SCIF. He said that only he and one other Republican has gone in and read it. He stated that NO Dem congressmen/women have taken the time to read it. Thus the Dem’s demand for being given access to an unredacted copy is a total false, they have it.

 

[Crepitus]

Dems Demand Copy of Unredacted Mueller Report
​

Dems Demand Copy of Unredacted Mueller Report
5 May 2019 ~ By John Semmens
Despite the fact that the copy of the Special Counsel’s released to the public shows less than 10 percent was redacted and despite the fact that a completely unredacted copy is available for key members of Congress to read (an opportunity no Democrat has yet to seize), Rep. Jerrold Nadler, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, demanded that Attorney General Barr turnover a completely unredacted copy or join him in petitioning the courts to void the law prohibiting grand jury testimony and classified information from being published.
Sen. Dick Durbin seconded Nadler’s remarks and added a demand that Barr “recuse himself from any further involvement connected with any investigations of the heroic government officials who have been covertly working to reverse the monumental error of electing Donald Trump president. He should follow the example set by his predecessor Jeff Sessions, who correctly stepped aside to allow the intelligence community to continue their efforts to save the country from this tyrant. There is no good reason why these patriots should have their livelihoods endangered and their reputations smeared for doing the right thing.”
Barr rejected these demands, pointing out that “my predecessor’s dereliction of duty is not an appropriate model for how an Attorney General should proceed. Whether those who spied on and conspired against candidate, and later president, Trump, thought they were doing the right thing shouldn’t shield them from the consequences of doing illegal things. We will continue to investigate, and if we find evidence that supports the prosecution of any of the individuals involved, those prosecutions will go forward.”
Meanwhile, Late Show host Steven Colbert expressed a desire to “wring the neck” of Barr, citing “the Constitution’s unalienable right of the people to abolish the government and institute a new government more to our liking” as a justification. “Trump and his henchmen are on the verge of undoing the legacy left us by President Obama,” he said. “Surely, this warrants the same sort of extreme action taken by the Founding Fathers to end the tyranny they faced in 1776.”


~~~~~~
A Republican congressman has been quoted stating that there is an unredacted copy available to every congressman to read in the House of Representative’s SCIF. He said that only he and one other Republican has gone in and read it. He stated that NO Dem congressmen/women have taken the time to read it. Thus the Dem’s demand for being given access to an unredacted copy is a total false, they have it.

No completely unredacted copy is available for congress to read. A less redacted copy is.

The only reason for Barr to fight this is that there is something he ( and by extension tRump) needs to remain hidden.

 

[watchingfromafar]

Dems Demand Copy of Unredacted Mueller Report

All Americans want to see this report.

-

 

[protectionist]

Dems Demand Copy of Unredacted Mueller Report

All Americans want to see this report.

NO WE DON'T! Reports have redactions for a REASON. To protect people from harm. Reckless, power-mad Democrats don't care about that. They know the redactions are proper. They are just trying to scam the public, and improve their chances for 2020.

 

[protectionist]

+
Since I know no un-redacted version of the Mueller report is out there it is you mouthing off, with ad hominem, worthless, emotional outburst.

Ok lets get honest here, is Russian your second language or the first-?
just asking
-

The only way you could "know" that "no un-redacted version of the Mueller report is out there" is if you had proof of that. So where's your proof ? Put up or shut up.

 

[protectionist]

No completely unredacted copy is available for congress to read. A less redacted copy is.

The only reason for Barr to fight this is that there is something he ( and by extension tRump) needs to remain hidden.

The only reason for Democrats to ask for this, is to scam the public.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

It will take a court order to release the unredacted report.

 

[DGS49]

The reason why Nadler is requesting this is because he knows that it CANNOT BE PRODUCED, BY LAW! The redactions are confidential grand jury information and classified information. NEITHER OF WHICH HAVE ANY INTEREST TO THOSE LEGITIMATELY INTERESTED IN THIS MATTER.

He requests it because it can contribute to the narrative that Barr is being secretive and protective of the President. It is total bullshit, as anyone with a three digit IQ already knows.

Which is why Democrats are so fixated with it.

 

[captkaos]

Dems Demand Copy of Unredacted Mueller Report
​

Dems Demand Copy of Unredacted Mueller Report
5 May 2019 ~ By John Semmens
Despite the fact that the copy of the Special Counsel’s released to the public shows less than 10 percent was redacted and despite the fact that a completely unredacted copy is available for key members of Congress to read (an opportunity no Democrat has yet to seize), Rep. Jerrold Nadler, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, demanded that Attorney General Barr turnover a completely unredacted copy or join him in petitioning the courts to void the law prohibiting grand jury testimony and classified information from being published.
Sen. Dick Durbin seconded Nadler’s remarks and added a demand that Barr “recuse himself from any further involvement connected with any investigations of the heroic government officials who have been covertly working to reverse the monumental error of electing Donald Trump president. He should follow the example set by his predecessor Jeff Sessions, who correctly stepped aside to allow the intelligence community to continue their efforts to save the country from this tyrant. There is no good reason why these patriots should have their livelihoods endangered and their reputations smeared for doing the right thing.”
Barr rejected these demands, pointing out that “my predecessor’s dereliction of duty is not an appropriate model for how an Attorney General should proceed. Whether those who spied on and conspired against candidate, and later president, Trump, thought they were doing the right thing shouldn’t shield them from the consequences of doing illegal things. We will continue to investigate, and if we find evidence that supports the prosecution of any of the individuals involved, those prosecutions will go forward.”
Meanwhile, Late Show host Steven Colbert expressed a desire to “wring the neck” of Barr, citing “the Constitution’s unalienable right of the people to abolish the government and institute a new government more to our liking” as a justification. “Trump and his henchmen are on the verge of undoing the legacy left us by President Obama,” he said. “Surely, this warrants the same sort of extreme action taken by the Founding Fathers to end the tyranny they faced in 1776.”


~~~~~~
A Republican congressman has been quoted stating that there is an unredacted copy available to every congressman to read in the House of Representative’s SCIF. He said that only he and one other Republican has gone in and read it. He stated that NO Dem congressmen/women have taken the time to read it. Thus the Dem’s demand for being given access to an unredacted copy is a total false, they have it.

No completely unredacted copy is available for congress to read. A less redacted copy is.

The only reason for Barr to fight this is that there is something he ( and by extension tRump) needs to remain hidden.

Decrepit! He didn't have to release any of it. If the Dems or anyone else wants to change the Law they ( Congress/ Senate can go about doing that. But until they do the law is very settled in the matter of the Special Counsels Investigation and report. Trump may have requested his AG to Investigate how the Russia hoax began and who propagated it. If that happens to affect Political opponents and former Govt. employees who conspired with them then so be it. Everybody wants to know the answer to those questions …….. Except for Dems who already know since they initiated it. Obama ordered it. (He's the only one who could order a Counter intelligence investigation) and that's what the Dems don't want disclosed at any cost.

 

[Crepitus]

No completely unredacted copy is available for congress to read. A less redacted copy is.

The only reason for Barr to fight this is that there is something he ( and by extension tRump) needs to remain hidden.

The only reason for Democrats to ask for this, is to scam the public.

What's to scam? You think they will lie about what it says? Do you realize who has the reputation for outrageous lies here?

 

[Crepitus]

Dems Demand Copy of Unredacted Mueller Report
​

Dems Demand Copy of Unredacted Mueller Report
5 May 2019 ~ By John Semmens
Despite the fact that the copy of the Special Counsel’s released to the public shows less than 10 percent was redacted and despite the fact that a completely unredacted copy is available for key members of Congress to read (an opportunity no Democrat has yet to seize), Rep. Jerrold Nadler, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, demanded that Attorney General Barr turnover a completely unredacted copy or join him in petitioning the courts to void the law prohibiting grand jury testimony and classified information from being published.
Sen. Dick Durbin seconded Nadler’s remarks and added a demand that Barr “recuse himself from any further involvement connected with any investigations of the heroic government officials who have been covertly working to reverse the monumental error of electing Donald Trump president. He should follow the example set by his predecessor Jeff Sessions, who correctly stepped aside to allow the intelligence community to continue their efforts to save the country from this tyrant. There is no good reason why these patriots should have their livelihoods endangered and their reputations smeared for doing the right thing.”
Barr rejected these demands, pointing out that “my predecessor’s dereliction of duty is not an appropriate model for how an Attorney General should proceed. Whether those who spied on and conspired against candidate, and later president, Trump, thought they were doing the right thing shouldn’t shield them from the consequences of doing illegal things. We will continue to investigate, and if we find evidence that supports the prosecution of any of the individuals involved, those prosecutions will go forward.”
Meanwhile, Late Show host Steven Colbert expressed a desire to “wring the neck” of Barr, citing “the Constitution’s unalienable right of the people to abolish the government and institute a new government more to our liking” as a justification. “Trump and his henchmen are on the verge of undoing the legacy left us by President Obama,” he said. “Surely, this warrants the same sort of extreme action taken by the Founding Fathers to end the tyranny they faced in 1776.”


~~~~~~
A Republican congressman has been quoted stating that there is an unredacted copy available to every congressman to read in the House of Representative’s SCIF. He said that only he and one other Republican has gone in and read it. He stated that NO Dem congressmen/women have taken the time to read it. Thus the Dem’s demand for being given access to an unredacted copy is a total false, they have it.

No completely unredacted copy is available for congress to read. A less redacted copy is.

The only reason for Barr to fight this is that there is something he ( and by extension tRump) needs to remain hidden.

Decrepit! He didn't have to release any of it. If the Dems or anyone else wants to change the Law they ( Congress/ Senate can go about doing that. But until they do the law is very settled in the matter of the Special Counsels Investigation and report. Trump may have requested his AG to Investigate how the Russia hoax began and who propagated it. If that happens to affect Political opponents and former Govt. employees who conspired with them then so be it. Everybody wants to know the answer to those questions …….. Except for Dems who already know since they initiated it. Obama ordered it. (He's the only one who could order a Counter intelligence investigation) and that's what the Dems don't want disclosed at any cost.

First, congratulations on making sure I know you're stupid and uneducated by your attempt at making my name an insult. If you had even a modicum of education and intelligence you'd know it is already self deprecating.

Second,. LMAO @ "hoax". I mean, are you really that gullible?

 

[percysunshine]

Dems demand Santa Claus use more female reindeer!

Of course, there is no Santa Claus, so they are being ignored again.

 

[Doc7505]

Trump is a spy and traitor and you know what we do with traitors !!!
And Doc7505 may even be a Russian mole too !!!
just kidding

-

~~~~~~
I've been called a lot of things in my life, especially since I've been posting on these Forum boards. This is a first. "Russian Mole' even jokingly.

 

[toobfreak]

Dems Demand Copy of Unredacted Mueller Report

All Americans want to see this report.

NO WE DON'T! Reports have redactions for a REASON. To protect people from harm. Reckless, power-mad Democrats don't care about that. They know the redactions are proper. They are just trying to scam the public, and improve their chances for 2020.

All those of us with an IQ above 80 and the maturity of at least a 6th grader know that there will never be released a fully unredacted report to anyone much less the public since these redactions are required by law not only to protect individuals within the report from harm but also to protect methods and sources deemed sensitive. Just one more political stunt by the adolescent Left which only fools and appeases the adolescent Left into thinking they are making it appear Barr and Trump are hiding something.

BUT THE GOOD NEWS is that they can keep it up, it won't do them one bit of good winning the next election and will most probably just lead them again into another false sense of security with Biden until the official thwacking in November 2020.

 

[Doc7505]

Trump is a spy and traitor and you know what we do with traitors !!!
And Doc7505 may even be a Russian mole too !!!

-

So you have nothing to say about the Democrats ignoring the unredacted copy of the Mueller report, available to every congressman to read in the House of Representative’s SCIF.

Instead, you just jump in here and mouth off, with ad hominem, worthless, emotional outburst.

Typical for Democrats these days. Ho hum. Yawn***

+
Since I know no un-redacted version of the Mueller report is out there it is you mouthing off, with ad hominem, worthless, emotional outburst.

Ok lets get honest here, is Russian your second language or the first-?
just asking
-

Where have you been? When A.G. Barr received the Mueller report, he promised he would produce a redacted report for the Public and another to Congress less redacted with as much information as possible except to Grand Jury information. This he has done yet dumb heads and Democrats are still dissatisfied.