Dems Demand Copy of Unredacted Mueller Report

[Doc7505]

Trump is a spy and traitor and you know what we do with traitors !!!
And Doc7505 may even be a Russian mole too !!!

-

So you have nothing to say about the Democrats ignoring the unredacted copy of the Mueller report, available to every congressman to read in the House of Representative’s SCIF.

Instead, you just jump in here and mouth off, with ad hominem, worthless, emotional outburst.

Typical for Democrats these days. Ho hum. Yawn***

+
Since I know no un-redacted version of the Mueller report is out there it is you mouthing off, with ad hominem, worthless, emotional outburst.

Ok lets get honest here, is Russian your second language or the first-?
just asking
-

Funny, I am fluent in two language. My first is the Sicilian dialect of Italian and the second is French. Yes, let's get honest here you're blowing smoke and attempting to deflect the issue. Yes there is at least one unredacted version of the 400 plus pages of the Mueller Report. It resides within the offices of the Dept. of Justice.

 

[Doc7505]

There is one available for them to read. Only a couple have chosen to. It’s another tall tale.

Dems Demand Copy of Unredacted Mueller Report
​

Dems Demand Copy of Unredacted Mueller Report
5 May 2019 ~ By John Semmens
Despite the fact that the copy of the Special Counsel’s released to the public shows less than 10 percent was redacted and despite the fact that a completely unredacted copy is available for key members of Congress to read (an opportunity no Democrat has yet to seize), Rep. Jerrold Nadler, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, demanded that Attorney General Barr turnover a completely unredacted copy or join him in petitioning the courts to void the law prohibiting grand jury testimony and classified information from being published.
Sen. Dick Durbin seconded Nadler’s remarks and added a demand that Barr “recuse himself from any further involvement connected with any investigations of the heroic government officials who have been covertly working to reverse the monumental error of electing Donald Trump president. He should follow the example set by his predecessor Jeff Sessions, who correctly stepped aside to allow the intelligence community to continue their efforts to save the country from this tyrant. There is no good reason why these patriots should have their livelihoods endangered and their reputations smeared for doing the right thing.”
Barr rejected these demands, pointing out that “my predecessor’s dereliction of duty is not an appropriate model for how an Attorney General should proceed. Whether those who spied on and conspired against candidate, and later president, Trump, thought they were doing the right thing shouldn’t shield them from the consequences of doing illegal things. We will continue to investigate, and if we find evidence that supports the prosecution of any of the individuals involved, those prosecutions will go forward.”
Meanwhile, Late Show host Steven Colbert expressed a desire to “wring the neck” of Barr, citing “the Constitution’s unalienable right of the people to abolish the government and institute a new government more to our liking” as a justification. “Trump and his henchmen are on the verge of undoing the legacy left us by President Obama,” he said. “Surely, this warrants the same sort of extreme action taken by the Founding Fathers to end the tyranny they faced in 1776.”


~~~~~~
A Republican congressman has been quoted stating that there is an unredacted copy available to every congressman to read in the House of Representative’s SCIF. He said that only he and one other Republican has gone in and read it. He stated that NO Dem congressmen/women have taken the time to read it. Thus the Dem’s demand for being given access to an unredacted copy is a total false, they have it.

~~~~~~
You're correct two Republican Senators have read the less redacted report in the House of Representative SCIF room. Democrats seem to have lost their directions to the room.

 

[toobfreak]

Trump is a spy and traitor and you know what we do with traitors !!!
And Doc7505 may even be a Russian mole too !!!

-

So you have nothing to say about the Democrats ignoring the unredacted copy of the Mueller report, available to every congressman to read in the House of Representative’s SCIF.

Instead, you just jump in here and mouth off, with ad hominem, worthless, emotional outburst.

Typical for Democrats these days. Ho hum. Yawn***

+
Since I know no un-redacted version of the Mueller report is out there it is you mouthing off, with ad hominem, worthless, emotional outburst.

Ok lets get honest here, is Russian your second language or the first-?
just asking
-

Where have you been? When A.G. Barr received the Mueller report, he promised he would produce a redacted report for the Public and another to Congress less redacted with as much information as possible except to Grand Jury information. This he has done yet dumb heads and Democrats are still dissatisfied.

Why bother responding to an idiot who is at best, a troll, and at worse, a sock puppet for an alias account? Part 2 of the report has less than 2% redactions I believe and Part 1 is irrelevant because Mueller made his findings clear: No collusion, no conspiracy, no criminal charges.

And apparently Part 2 was so weak, he punted.

Wasn't that just his way of saying: "I give up, Dems, you try?"

 

[captkaos]

Dems Demand Copy of Unredacted Mueller Report
​

Dems Demand Copy of Unredacted Mueller Report
5 May 2019 ~ By John Semmens
Despite the fact that the copy of the Special Counsel’s released to the public shows less than 10 percent was redacted and despite the fact that a completely unredacted copy is available for key members of Congress to read (an opportunity no Democrat has yet to seize), Rep. Jerrold Nadler, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, demanded that Attorney General Barr turnover a completely unredacted copy or join him in petitioning the courts to void the law prohibiting grand jury testimony and classified information from being published.
Sen. Dick Durbin seconded Nadler’s remarks and added a demand that Barr “recuse himself from any further involvement connected with any investigations of the heroic government officials who have been covertly working to reverse the monumental error of electing Donald Trump president. He should follow the example set by his predecessor Jeff Sessions, who correctly stepped aside to allow the intelligence community to continue their efforts to save the country from this tyrant. There is no good reason why these patriots should have their livelihoods endangered and their reputations smeared for doing the right thing.”
Barr rejected these demands, pointing out that “my predecessor’s dereliction of duty is not an appropriate model for how an Attorney General should proceed. Whether those who spied on and conspired against candidate, and later president, Trump, thought they were doing the right thing shouldn’t shield them from the consequences of doing illegal things. We will continue to investigate, and if we find evidence that supports the prosecution of any of the individuals involved, those prosecutions will go forward.”
Meanwhile, Late Show host Steven Colbert expressed a desire to “wring the neck” of Barr, citing “the Constitution’s unalienable right of the people to abolish the government and institute a new government more to our liking” as a justification. “Trump and his henchmen are on the verge of undoing the legacy left us by President Obama,” he said. “Surely, this warrants the same sort of extreme action taken by the Founding Fathers to end the tyranny they faced in 1776.”


~~~~~~
A Republican congressman has been quoted stating that there is an unredacted copy available to every congressman to read in the House of Representative’s SCIF. He said that only he and one other Republican has gone in and read it. He stated that NO Dem congressmen/women have taken the time to read it. Thus the Dem’s demand for being given access to an unredacted copy is a total false, they have it.

No completely unredacted copy is available for congress to read. A less redacted copy is.

The only reason for Barr to fight this is that there is something he ( and by extension tRump) needs to remain hidden.

Decrepit! He didn't have to release any of it. If the Dems or anyone else wants to change the Law they ( Congress/ Senate can go about doing that. But until they do the law is very settled in the matter of the Special Counsels Investigation and report. Trump may have requested his AG to Investigate how the Russia hoax began and who propagated it. If that happens to affect Political opponents and former Govt. employees who conspired with them then so be it. Everybody wants to know the answer to those questions …….. Except for Dems who already know since they initiated it. Obama ordered it. (He's the only one who could order a Counter intelligence investigation) and that's what the Dems don't want disclosed at any cost.

First, congratulations on making sure I know you're stupid and uneducated by your attempt at making my name an insult. If you had even a modicum of education and intelligence you'd know it is already self deprecating.

Second,. LMAO @ "hoax". I mean, are you really that gullible?

Typical Dem leftist, liberal. Can't debate the facts so you just make insults and try to show how magnificent and righteous you are. Why ? Because your Party and Ideology has nothing to offer except Lies and Empty promises to people who you say you need to help save from Ultimate destruction. Socialism and Liberal Policies always crumble under the weight of the greed and Nepotism the Ideology demands. And Yes I know your Tag is Self deprecating just wanted to ruffle your feathers
Snowflake! So you already know you're a loser good! Don't cry in November 2019, Like you did in 2016. It's really pitiful!

 

[captkaos]

There is one available for them to read. Only a couple have chosen to. It’s another tall tale.

Dems Demand Copy of Unredacted Mueller Report
​

Dems Demand Copy of Unredacted Mueller Report
5 May 2019 ~ By John Semmens
Despite the fact that the copy of the Special Counsel’s released to the public shows less than 10 percent was redacted and despite the fact that a completely unredacted copy is available for key members of Congress to read (an opportunity no Democrat has yet to seize), Rep. Jerrold Nadler, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, demanded that Attorney General Barr turnover a completely unredacted copy or join him in petitioning the courts to void the law prohibiting grand jury testimony and classified information from being published.
Sen. Dick Durbin seconded Nadler’s remarks and added a demand that Barr “recuse himself from any further involvement connected with any investigations of the heroic government officials who have been covertly working to reverse the monumental error of electing Donald Trump president. He should follow the example set by his predecessor Jeff Sessions, who correctly stepped aside to allow the intelligence community to continue their efforts to save the country from this tyrant. There is no good reason why these patriots should have their livelihoods endangered and their reputations smeared for doing the right thing.”
Barr rejected these demands, pointing out that “my predecessor’s dereliction of duty is not an appropriate model for how an Attorney General should proceed. Whether those who spied on and conspired against candidate, and later president, Trump, thought they were doing the right thing shouldn’t shield them from the consequences of doing illegal things. We will continue to investigate, and if we find evidence that supports the prosecution of any of the individuals involved, those prosecutions will go forward.”
Meanwhile, Late Show host Steven Colbert expressed a desire to “wring the neck” of Barr, citing “the Constitution’s unalienable right of the people to abolish the government and institute a new government more to our liking” as a justification. “Trump and his henchmen are on the verge of undoing the legacy left us by President Obama,” he said. “Surely, this warrants the same sort of extreme action taken by the Founding Fathers to end the tyranny they faced in 1776.”


~~~~~~
A Republican congressman has been quoted stating that there is an unredacted copy available to every congressman to read in the House of Representative’s SCIF. He said that only he and one other Republican has gone in and read it. He stated that NO Dem congressmen/women have taken the time to read it. Thus the Dem’s demand for being given access to an unredacted copy is a total false, they have it.

~~~~~~
You're correct two Republican Senators have read the less redacted report in the House of Representative SCIF room. Democrats seem to have lost their directions to the room.

They can't find it because they have AOC, Omar and Tlaib leading the way. I don't think any of them will find anything but the Exit door come the Next Election cycle. The left has Commies and Deviants leading their Party good luck to ya'll in 2020

 

[protectionist]

Do you realize who has the reputation for outrageous lies here?

Yup. Hillary Clinton. Hands down.

 

[watchingfromafar]

Typical Dem leftist, liberal. Can't debate the facts so you.,,.,.,

Facts are what the eye of the beholder believes. This is what they see through biased eyes.
Trump is a bold faced liar who will say anything you want to hear. You have been sucked into his mind melt.
Or you and trump were cut from the same cloth.
Either way, trump is a pathological liar and a great con artist and if you side with him you are no different.

just my point of view
-

 

[Zorro!]

REALCLEARINVESTIGATIONS: Mueller Report’s Hired Guns

Special Counsel Robert Mueller spent more than $732,000 on outside contractors, including private investigators and researchers, records show, but his office refuses to say who they were. Mueller also hired contractors to compile “investigative reports” and other “information."

The arrangement has led congressional investigators, government watchdog groups and others to speculate that the private investigators and researchers who worked for the special counsel’s office might have included Christopher Steele and Fusion GPS, the private research firm that hired Steele to produce the Russia collusion dossier for the Clinton campaign.

Dossier creators may have been involved in Mueller’s operation – and even had a hand in his final report – because the special counsel sent his team to London to meet with Steele within a few months of taking over the Russia collusion investigation in 2017. Also, Mueller’s lead prosecutor, Andrew Weissmann, had shared information he received from Fusion with the media.

Mueller’s report recycles the general allegations leveled in the dossier. And taking a page from earlier surveillance-warrant applications in the Russia investigation, it cites as supporting evidence several articles – including one by Yahoo! News – that used Steele and Fusion as sources.

Mueller even kept alive one of the dossier’s most obscene accusations – that Moscow had "compromising tapes" of Trump with Russian hookers – for which no evidence has ever surfaced.

Mueller’s reliance on the Steele dossier is raising questions because it occurred long after FBI Director James B. Comey described the dossier as “unverified.”

U.S. Rep. Devin Nunes, the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, said the report should be renamed “The Mueller Dossier,” because he says it contains a lot of similar innuendo. Even though Mueller failed to corroborate key allegations leveled in the dossier, Nunes said his report twists key facts to put a collusion gloss on events. He also asserted that it selectively quotes from Trump campaign emails and omits exculpatory information in ways that cast the campaign’s activities in the most sinister light.

https://www.realclearinvestigations.../who_were_the_mueller_reports_hired_guns.html

 

[Zorro!]

Dems Demand Copy of Unredacted Mueller Report
​

Dems Demand Copy of Unredacted Mueller Report
5 May 2019 ~ By John Semmens
Despite the fact that the copy of the Special Counsel’s released to the public shows less than 10 percent was redacted and despite the fact that a completely unredacted copy is available for key members of Congress to read (an opportunity no Democrat has yet to seize), Rep. Jerrold Nadler, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, demanded that Attorney General Barr turnover a completely unredacted copy or join him in petitioning the courts to void the law prohibiting grand jury testimony and classified information from being published.
Sen. Dick Durbin seconded Nadler’s remarks and added a demand that Barr “recuse himself from any further involvement connected with any investigations of the heroic government officials who have been covertly working to reverse the monumental error of electing Donald Trump president. He should follow the example set by his predecessor Jeff Sessions, who correctly stepped aside to allow the intelligence community to continue their efforts to save the country from this tyrant. There is no good reason why these patriots should have their livelihoods endangered and their reputations smeared for doing the right thing.”
Barr rejected these demands, pointing out that “my predecessor’s dereliction of duty is not an appropriate model for how an Attorney General should proceed. Whether those who spied on and conspired against candidate, and later president, Trump, thought they were doing the right thing shouldn’t shield them from the consequences of doing illegal things. We will continue to investigate, and if we find evidence that supports the prosecution of any of the individuals involved, those prosecutions will go forward.”
Meanwhile, Late Show host Steven Colbert expressed a desire to “wring the neck” of Barr, citing “the Constitution’s unalienable right of the people to abolish the government and institute a new government more to our liking” as a justification. “Trump and his henchmen are on the verge of undoing the legacy left us by President Obama,” he said. “Surely, this warrants the same sort of extreme action taken by the Founding Fathers to end the tyranny they faced in 1776.”


~~~~~~
A Republican congressman has been quoted stating that there is an unredacted copy available to every congressman to read in the House of Representative’s SCIF. He said that only he and one other Republican has gone in and read it. He stated that NO Dem congressmen/women have taken the time to read it. Thus the Dem’s demand for being given access to an unredacted copy is a total false, they have it.

No completely unredacted copy is available for congress to read. A less redacted copy is.

The only reason for Barr to fight this is that there is something he ( and by extension tRump) needs to remain hidden.

Well, that's a silly take on it, isn't it.

DEMOCRATS CRY “FOUL” ON MUELLER REPORT

Democrats are still mourning the loss of their Mueller Report dreams. They are trying to keep hope alive by, e.g., voting to hold Attorney General Barr in contempt for obeying the law. And they continue to fund raise off Mueller–who, after all, did the best he could for them.

This morning the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee sent out an email with the subject line “MUELLER ALERT.” It began:

Our Democrats just voted to hold Trump’s attorney general in contempt of Congress for protecting Trump.

We need to finally get to the bottom of Trump’s Russia ties.

URGENT: Condemn Trump and his Republicans for hiding the report.>>​

Good luck with those “Russia ties.” Much as he tried to help the Democrats, Mueller gave Trump the only victory voters care about by acknowledging that there is zero evidence of collusion.