So everyone is too corrupt to institute ethics rules?
What a stupid claim.
There's already ethics rules for the court, it's called the impeachment process.
.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So everyone is too corrupt to institute ethics rules?
What a stupid claim.
Ok. There is a process to expand the court in the Constitution; not by pen in the President’s office.
Whatever the hell that's supposed to be about, I wasn't talking about that.
Calm down, snowflake.
This POS supreme Court is a great argument against the Republicans and could give us Democratic landslides for some timeActually it only requires both houses of congress to pass a bill and the presidents signature. The Constitution only establishes the court, it doesn't specify the number of justices.
.
What "rights" has the court removed? Can you name a single one?Republicans used every means possible to build this activist right wing Court.
They have ruled against decades of progress...removed rights for the first time ever in the SC.
Yes...it's time to expand the Court
Abortion is STILL a "right." You just have to travel to a state where baby-killing is still "legal."Abortion was a RIGHT...until Dobbs
That's just the most obvious
It absolutely WAS a right. The fact that you approve of taking away that right notwhithstanding
1. Ending affirmative action
Two cases could see the Supreme Court decide that colleges can no longer consider race as one of several factors when making admissions decisions, a move that would overturn four decades of precedent and deal a major blow to efforts to diversify college campuses and address historic inequality. Affirmative action has given a chance to those historically shut out of the system because of their race, ethnicity, income, or identity. Students of color remain underrepresented on many campuses; and in states that have eliminated affirmative action, public universities have seen dramatic declines in the number of minority students admitted.
- Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College
- Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina
Affirmative action helps promote diversity in ways that a focus on economic disparity alone cannot. Race-conscious remedies, including protections for voting rights and affirmative action, are supported by the Constitution. They have long been part of American history and are fundamental to equal opportunity.
Um no....You really don't know what 'advice and consent' means do you?This court was created by unconstitutional means McConnell efused to allow a president his costitutional right to nominate a judge, then he rushed another in during an election that a republican eventually lost. Both those seats woulld have stopped what we see nnow..
Abortion is NOT a RIGHT...Never was....Abortion is STILL a "right." You just have to travel to a state where baby-killing is still "legal."
What gave you the idea I didn't know that?When are you commies going to realize the Senate is the upper chamber of congress? And both of your suggestions would require a constitutional amendment. Good luck, LMAO.
.
Did they do anything against the law?Ya mean like holding a SC seat open until you get a Republican President and then slamming another appointee in weeks before the next Presidential election?
Like that?
No. And neither would expanding the Court be against the lawDid they do anything against the law?
There’s a sayingIf congress thinks a justice has violated proper ethics they have the impeachment process. That is the only constitutional remedy.
.
Good luck with that. Maybe you can do that right after you get rid of the electoral college. LOLNo. And neither would expanding the Court be against the law
It can be done right after we have 53 Dem Senators elected (53 because two existing ones vote with Repubs)Good luck with that. Maybe you can do that right after you get rid of the electoral college. LOL
Term limits for all. Supreme Court judges, House and Senate members. Repeal the 17th Amendment and give the power to front Federal Senators to the State legislatures again. You want democracy or a republic.It can be done right after we have 53 Dem Senators elected (53 because two existing ones vote with Repubs)
Damn. You're dumber than I thought.It can be done right after we have 53 Dem Senators elected (53 because two existing ones vote with Repubs)
Apparently you haven't looked at the Senate map for 2024. Not to worry though, after then you won't have to worry about Manchin and Sinema anymore.It can be done right after we have 53 Dem Senators elected (53 because two existing ones vote with Repubs)
We’ll see. These recent decisions should wake voters up.Apparently you haven't looked at the Senate map for 2024. Not to worry though, after then you won't have to worry about Manchin and Sinema anymore.
LOL. Yeah, keep on thinking that.We’ll see. These recent decisions should wake voters up.