Democrats Are Hiding From Bill Clinton's Alleged Sex Crimes

[easyt65]

NYT Can’t Find Any Democrats To Defend Bill Clinton

'The New York Times couldn’t find any Democrats to defend former President Bill Clinton in an article revisiting the sexual harassment and rape claims against him.

The flood of sexual harassment accusations against prominent figures like Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein and Alabama GOP Senate candidate Roy Moore has forced many members of the establishment media to revisit the litany of accusations against the former president.'

“Mr. Clinton has kept publicly quiet amid the flurry of sexual misconduct stories lately, and his office had no comment on Wednesday,” Baker wrote. “But other Democrats were not as willing to come to his defense this week. Of a dozen prominent political activists contacted on Wednesday, none went on the record on Mr. Clinton’s behalf.”

Democrats’ public distancing from Clinton is a stark contrast from the way they treated him while he was still politically influential."


Chelsea Handler To Juanita Broaddrick: I Believe Bill Clinton Raped You


'I was 35 years old when Bill Clinton, Ark. Attorney General raped me and Hillary tried to silence me. I am now 73….it never goes away.
— Juanita Broaddrick (@atensnut) January 6, 2016'


'Liberal comedian Chelsea Handler apologized on Wednesday to the Arkansas woman who accused Bill Clinton of raping her in a Little Rock hotel room in the 1970s.

“I apologize to you for not knowing your story,” Handler told Juanita Broaddrick on Twitter.

“I believe you,” she added.'

 

[Rexx Taylor]

i cant help but think of that photo of Hillary checking out some celebrities killer 36dd's.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

In all seriousness, this is what could backfire heavily.
Some of the quotes from back then from Democrat house members on the Lewinsky incident alone would be pretty horribly embarrassing today.

 

[TheOldSchool]

NYT Can’t Find Any Democrats To Defend Bill Clinton

Contrast that with Trump's base, that is engaging in a full on endorsement of raping children.

 

[easyt65]

Contrast that with Trump's base, that is engaging in a full on endorsement of raping children.

Now why did you have to go and blatantly LIE in an attempt to make a bogus accusation, pi$$ing all over your credibility, like that?

The only case you made just then was the one for ignoring anything else you have to say.

Maybe if you say something intelligent in the future I will start paying attention again.....

 

[ScreamingEagle]

'The New York Times couldn’t find any Democrats to defend former President Bill Clinton

The reason is simple.....it's not about moral outrage (r u kidding) against Clinton, it's about power and money, same as always.

The Demonrats are getting rid of the Clintons as they have become old baggage that is not good for elections plus they suck up too much of the DNC money. This started with Donna Brazile, who knows what they will do next to get rid of Shrillary for good.

 

[Timmy]

Oh the desperate distractions by the cons .

1- Bill Clinton was in office 25 years ago.
2- his womanizing was well publicized.

What does any of this have to do with Moore?

 

[ScreamingEagle]

Oh the desperate distractions by the cons .

1- Bill Clinton was in office 25 years ago.
2- his womanizing was well publicized.

What does any of this have to do with Moore?

Demonrats DEFENDED Clinton.....so why are they attacking Moore?

 

[Timmy]

Oh the desperate distractions by the cons .

1- Bill Clinton was in office 25 years ago.
2- his womanizing was well publicized.

What does any of this have to do with Moore?

Demonrats DEFENDED Clinton.....so why are they attacking Moore?

Clinton wasn’t tailing underage girls .

Oh, the cons didn’t seem to mind crapping all over Hollywood pervs two weeks ago . Now that one of their own gets banged out , the cons suddenly pull a 180! Like in a weeks time!

 

[ScreamingEagle]

Oh the desperate distractions by the cons .

1- Bill Clinton was in office 25 years ago.
2- his womanizing was well publicized.

What does any of this have to do with Moore?

Demonrats DEFENDED Clinton.....so why are they attacking Moore?

Clinton wasn’t tailing underage girls .

Oh, the cons didn’t seem to mind crapping all over Hollywood pervs two weeks ago . Now that one of their own gets banged out , the cons suddenly pull a 180! Like in a weeks time!

No, Clinton was just raping young women....as if that's any better....

 

[iceberg]

Oh the desperate distractions by the cons .

1- Bill Clinton was in office 25 years ago.
2- his womanizing was well publicized.

What does any of this have to do with Moore?

Demonrats DEFENDED Clinton.....so why are they attacking Moore?

Clinton wasn’t tailing underage girls .

Oh, the cons didn’t seem to mind crapping all over Hollywood pervs two weeks ago . Now that one of their own gets banged out , the cons suddenly pull a 180! Like in a weeks time!

Bill Clinton ditched Secret Service on multiple ‘Lolita Express’ flights: Report

sure he wasn't.

 

[Siete]

Democrats Are Hiding From Bill Clinton's Alleged Sex Crimes


cant really blame them - they cant afford for him to be impeached.

DUHDERP DUHDERP

 

[jc456]

NYT Can’t Find Any Democrats To Defend Bill Clinton

Contrast that with Trump's base, that is engaging in a full on endorsement of raping children.

where is that at? you'd have to give some examples.

 

[Timmy]

Oh the desperate distractions by the cons .

1- Bill Clinton was in office 25 years ago.
2- his womanizing was well publicized.

What does any of this have to do with Moore?

Demonrats DEFENDED Clinton.....so why are they attacking Moore?

Clinton wasn’t tailing underage girls .

Oh, the cons didn’t seem to mind crapping all over Hollywood pervs two weeks ago . Now that one of their own gets banged out , the cons suddenly pull a 180! Like in a weeks time!

No, Clinton was just raping young women....as if that's any better....

So did Trump .

But hey, you righties are so morally superior from ya godless liberals . Lol, Bunch of fakes!

 

[jc456]

Oh the desperate distractions by the cons .

1- Bill Clinton was in office 25 years ago.
2- his womanizing was well publicized.

What does any of this have to do with Moore?

Demonrats DEFENDED Clinton.....so why are they attacking Moore?

Clinton wasn’t tailing underage girls .

Oh, the cons didn’t seem to mind crapping all over Hollywood pervs two weeks ago . Now that one of their own gets banged out , the cons suddenly pull a 180! Like in a weeks time!

who was doing that?

 

[jc456]

Oh the desperate distractions by the cons .

1- Bill Clinton was in office 25 years ago.
2- his womanizing was well publicized.

What does any of this have to do with Moore?

Demonrats DEFENDED Clinton.....so why are they attacking Moore?

Clinton wasn’t tailing underage girls .

Oh, the cons didn’t seem to mind crapping all over Hollywood pervs two weeks ago . Now that one of their own gets banged out , the cons suddenly pull a 180! Like in a weeks time!

No, Clinton was just raping young women....as if that's any better....

So did Trump .

But hey, you righties are so morally superior from ya godless liberals . Lol, Bunch of fakes!

nice fiction.

 

[NYcarbineer]

If you voted for Trump, you put yourself in the same boat as those who voted for Clinton.

 

[ScreamingEagle]

Democrats Are Hiding From Bill Clinton's Alleged Sex Crimes


cant really blame them - they cant afford for him to be impeached.

DUHDERP DUHDERP

You forget Shrillary's aspirations.

Besides it's kinda hard to defend Bill while they attack Moore....

 

[jc456]

If you voted for Trump, you put yourself in the same boat as those who voted for Clinton.

ohhhhhkay

 

[NYcarbineer]

If you voted for Trump, you put yourself in the same boat as those who voted for Clinton.

ohhhhhkay

I voted for Perot, because of NAFTA.

lol, I win.