Maybe "Mixed Use" Development for new infrastructure can be an off-shoot of more Infrastructure Spending in the Democratic Party, traditional areas. Attracting newer high-tech commercial enterprise often means creating the entire infrastructure in one unit. How to monetarize even a Trump plan? All utilities, roads, commercial and residential buildings and walkways, are in the same place. Virginia has these. India could use these. (Some were planned for India.) Probably Wisconsin, Michigan, (Flynt), and rural Pennsylvania could use these. These could be the newer concept, PPP's that maybe Trump's radicals have in mind. Private Public Partnerships need to be profitable. When new and high tech industry sees streets, water, roads, garbage collection, housing, and commercial building as a complete and self-contained enterprise, then commerce happens. Then the new industry will come, and pay the bills, with new residents even paying their usual bills. India needs nfrastructure, too. These had been contemplated, even on the road to Taj Mahal.
The Democrats probably need infrastructure too, not just a new tax gimmick loophole. Canada does real Mixed Use, where it is needed.
____________________________
What are Mixed-Use Projects and Why They Matter
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Mostly Republicans view "Mixed Use Neighborhoods" as places to send rotted corn, and poison blankets!)
The Democrats probably need infrastructure too, not just a new tax gimmick loophole. Canada does real Mixed Use, where it is needed.
____________________________
What are Mixed-Use Projects and Why They Matter
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Mostly Republicans view "Mixed Use Neighborhoods" as places to send rotted corn, and poison blankets!)