Democratic Party set to include Michael Bloomberg in debates

[pknopp]

I think the Good Lord has a wicked sense of humor. The Stalinists rail against rich, old, white billionaires - and one just bought the nomination

The chances of him winning are zero.

The dems don't want Bloomberg winning, he's not socialist enough. They want his money that he promised to them.

We are all socialists. That is no longer a legitimate argument. Are you now working for the billions the Fed is pumping into wall street?

Did you miss the part where I said, " he's not socialist enough? For the love of God, stupidity runs deep within your veins.

How so? He supports the massive socialist actions of the Fed. Sanders doesn't. Who exactly is actually the Socialist?

 

[NightFox]

I think the Good Lord has a wicked sense of humor. The Stalinists rail against rich, old, white billionaires - and one just bought the nomination

The chances of him winning are zero.

Don't count him out just yet, the same opinion was commonly voiced about Donald Trump's chances of winning the nomination in 2016.

... and Trump is a pauper compared to Bloomberg.

"Funny how money speaks even more loudly than morals in this beautiful, superficial material world." -- Rasheed Ogunlaru

The problem is the Sanders supporters are a huge portion of the electorate the (D) would need to win and absolutely none will support him in any way. None of those who ran against Trump had much support.

What data do you have the leads you to those conclusions?

 

[pknopp]

I think the Good Lord has a wicked sense of humor. The Stalinists rail against rich, old, white billionaires - and one just bought the nomination

The chances of him winning are zero.

Don't count him out just yet, the same opinion was commonly voiced about Donald Trump's chances of winning the nomination in 2016.

... and Trump is a pauper compared to Bloomberg.

"Funny how money speaks even more loudly than morals in this beautiful, superficial material world." -- Rasheed Ogunlaru

The problem is the Sanders supporters are a huge portion of the electorate the (D) would need to win and absolutely none will support him in any way. None of those who ran against Trump had much support.

What data do you have the leads you to those conclusions?

LOL. Sanders has been ahead since the last election. Can I prove that by the polls? No, but the polls are no longer legit measures.

What is happening is exactly what I said would happen long ago. Sanders has always been ahead. The polls have shown what those running the polls have wanted them to show. I noted that when it comes right down to it the polls would change to actual numbers as those doing the polling doesn't want egg on their face.

Polling has become a part of the cult mentality in politics.

 

[Mac-7]

"Democratic Party set to include Michael Bloomberg in debates with change to qualifying requirement"

Well, money talks. Democrats always answer.

Democratic Party set to include Michael Bloomberg in debates with change to qualifying requirements

Will bloomberg get to stand on a box because he’s so short?

 

[Mac-7]

I think the Good Lord has a wicked sense of humor. The Stalinists rail against rich, old, white billionaires - and one just bought the nomination

That may turn out to be a fact

i guess trump is the only rich guy libs hate more than bloomberg

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

I guess Tulsi did not have enough cash to buy her way in

It is really how frustratingly little say so the public has when it comes to narrowing down the field.
Also irritates me that primaries are staggered like they are. Makes my vote count far less than someone who voted a month before me. People drop out before a majority even get to vote.

Polling determines who is in the debates. After Citizens United brought to you by a Republican Supreme Court, are you complaining about money in politics? LOL

Citizens United has NOTHING to do with the DNC changing the rules midway through the game or allowing Bloomberg to buy his way onto the stage lol

 

[bendog]

I guess Tulsi did not have enough cash to buy her way in

It is really how frustratingly little say so the public has when it comes to narrowing down the field.
Also irritates me that primaries are staggered like they are. Makes my vote count far less than someone who voted a month before me. People drop out before a majority even get to vote.

Polling determines who is in the debates. After Citizens United brought to you by a Republican Supreme Court, are you complaining about money in politics? LOL

Citizens United has NOTHING to do with the DNC changing the rules midway through the game or allowing Bloomberg to buy his way onto the stage lol

And I recall your OUTRAGE at Donald Trump using his own plane ……..

I mean let's not have people spend their own money. It's …. unamerican, grumpy gramps

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

I guess Tulsi did not have enough cash to buy her way in

It is really how frustratingly little say so the public has when it comes to narrowing down the field.
Also irritates me that primaries are staggered like they are. Makes my vote count far less than someone who voted a month before me. People drop out before a majority even get to vote.

Polling determines who is in the debates. After Citizens United brought to you by a Republican Supreme Court, are you complaining about money in politics? LOL

Citizens United has NOTHING to do with the DNC changing the rules midway through the game or allowing Bloomberg to buy his way onto the stage lol

And I recall your OUTRAGE at Donald Trump using his own plane ……..

I mean let's not have people spend their own money. It's …. unamerican, grumpy gramps

If you lack the intellectual capacity to discuss the topic....leave

 

[easyt65]

Someone in the Sanders campaign leaked the schematic design for the intricate series of platforms the DNC has built for Bloomberg so he can reach the podium during the debates:








.

 

[bendog]

fucking hypocrites, you are

PolitiFact - Is Donald Trump self-funding his campaign? Sort of

 

[bendog]

I guess Tulsi did not have enough cash to buy her way in

It is really how frustratingly little say so the public has when it comes to narrowing down the field.
Also irritates me that primaries are staggered like they are. Makes my vote count far less than someone who voted a month before me. People drop out before a majority even get to vote.

Polling determines who is in the debates. After Citizens United brought to you by a Republican Supreme Court, are you complaining about money in politics? LOL

Citizens United has NOTHING to do with the DNC changing the rules midway through the game or allowing Bloomberg to buy his way onto the stage lol

And I recall your OUTRAGE at Donald Trump using his own plane ……..

I mean let's not have people spend their own money. It's …. unamerican, grumpy gramps

If you lack the intellectual capacity to discuss the topic....leave

you're a fucking hypocrite, gramps. And not very smart,. But maybe it's just your memory that's going.
Every Position Donald Trump Has Taken On How He Is Funding His Campaign

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

fucking hypocrites, you are

PolitiFact - Is Donald Trump self-funding his campaign? Sort of

It's not about self funding ya retard. There is no hypocrisy.

It is about the DNC CHANGING THE RULES & Bloomberg BRIBING HIS WAY ON STAGE.

Fool

 

[NightFox]

I think the Good Lord has a wicked sense of humor. The Stalinists rail against rich, old, white billionaires - and one just bought the nomination

The chances of him winning are zero.

Don't count him out just yet, the same opinion was commonly voiced about Donald Trump's chances of winning the nomination in 2016.

... and Trump is a pauper compared to Bloomberg.

"Funny how money speaks even more loudly than morals in this beautiful, superficial material world." -- Rasheed Ogunlaru

The problem is the Sanders supporters are a huge portion of the electorate the (D) would need to win and absolutely none will support him in any way. None of those who ran against Trump had much support.

What data do you have the leads you to those conclusions?

LOL. Sanders has been ahead since the last election. Can I prove that by the polls? No, but the polls are no longer legit measures.

What is happening is exactly what I said would happen long ago. Sanders has always been ahead. The polls have shown what those running the polls have wanted them to show. I noted that when it comes right down to it the polls would change to actual numbers as those doing the polling doesn't want egg on their face.

Polling has become a part of the cult mentality in politics.

In other words you have no actual data that supports your assertions? I wasn't asking if you could PROVE anything, I asked what data you had that led you to your conclusions and what you responded with was a bunch of irrelevant nonsense regarding how polling isn't accurate right after remarking that "Sanders has been ahead since the last election" and including "Sanders has always been ahead".

I ask again; what DATA do you have that leads you to the conclusions "Sanders supporters are a huge portion of the electorate the (D) would need to win and absolutely none will support him any way" and "None of those who ran against Trump had much support."?

 

[bendog]

fucking hypocrites, you are

PolitiFact - Is Donald Trump self-funding his campaign? Sort of

It's not about self funding ya retard. There is no hypocrisy.

It is about the DNC CHANGING THE RULES & Bloomberg BRIBING HIS WAY ON STAGE.

Fool

Oh it's just about the money. Fuck yourself
The Lie of Trump's 'Self-Funding' Campaign

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

fucking hypocrites, you are

PolitiFact - Is Donald Trump self-funding his campaign? Sort of

It's not about self funding ya retard. There is no hypocrisy.

It is about the DNC CHANGING THE RULES & Bloomberg BRIBING HIS WAY ON STAGE.

Fool

Oh it's just about the money. Fuck yourself
The Lie of Trump's 'Self-Funding' Campaign

You're too stupid to bother with.


Later

 

[pknopp]

The chances of him winning are zero.

Don't count him out just yet, the same opinion was commonly voiced about Donald Trump's chances of winning the nomination in 2016.

... and Trump is a pauper compared to Bloomberg.

"Funny how money speaks even more loudly than morals in this beautiful, superficial material world." -- Rasheed Ogunlaru

The problem is the Sanders supporters are a huge portion of the electorate the (D) would need to win and absolutely none will support him in any way. None of those who ran against Trump had much support.

What data do you have the leads you to those conclusions?

LOL. Sanders has been ahead since the last election. Can I prove that by the polls? No, but the polls are no longer legit measures.

What is happening is exactly what I said would happen long ago. Sanders has always been ahead. The polls have shown what those running the polls have wanted them to show. I noted that when it comes right down to it the polls would change to actual numbers as those doing the polling doesn't want egg on their face.

Polling has become a part of the cult mentality in politics.

In other words you have no actual data that supports your assertions? I wasn't asking if you could PROVE anything, I asked what data you had that led you to your conclusions and what you responded with was a bunch of irrelevant nonsense regarding how polling isn't accurate right after remarking that "Sanders has been ahead since the last election" and including "Sanders has always been ahead".

I ask again; what DATA do you have that leads you to the conclusions "Sanders supporters are a huge portion of the electorate the (D) would need to win and absolutely none will support him any way" and "None of those who ran against Trump had much support."?

What I said long ago would happen has happened. You can feel it all a coincidence if you want but you know it isn't.

 

[Cosmos]

Billionaire thinks he can buy the election like it was a toy on Amazon. DNC stupid enough to fall for it.

 

[Cosmos]

But the best part is Trump talking about Mini-Mike demanding a box to stand on. Gotta love Trump.

 

[iceberg]

I think the Good Lord has a wicked sense of humor. The Stalinists rail against rich, old, white billionaires - and one just bought the nomination

The chances of him winning are zero.

Don't count him out just yet, the same opinion was commonly voiced about Donald Trump's chances of winning the nomination in 2016.

... and Trump is a pauper compared to Bloomberg.

"Funny how money speaks even more loudly than morals in this beautiful, superficial material world." -- Rasheed Ogunlaru

The problem is the Sanders supporters are a huge portion of the electorate the (D) would need to win and absolutely none will support him in any way. None of those who ran against Trump had much support.

What data do you have the leads you to those conclusions?

LOL. Sanders has been ahead since the last election. Can I prove that by the polls? No, but the polls are no longer legit measures.

What is happening is exactly what I said would happen long ago. Sanders has always been ahead. The polls have shown what those running the polls have wanted them to show. I noted that when it comes right down to it the polls would change to actual numbers as those doing the polling doesn't want egg on their face.

Polling has become a part of the cult mentality in politics.

so what you are saying is you can't prove it, you just feel it.

 

[pknopp]

The chances of him winning are zero.

Don't count him out just yet, the same opinion was commonly voiced about Donald Trump's chances of winning the nomination in 2016.

... and Trump is a pauper compared to Bloomberg.

"Funny how money speaks even more loudly than morals in this beautiful, superficial material world." -- Rasheed Ogunlaru

The problem is the Sanders supporters are a huge portion of the electorate the (D) would need to win and absolutely none will support him in any way. None of those who ran against Trump had much support.

What data do you have the leads you to those conclusions?

LOL. Sanders has been ahead since the last election. Can I prove that by the polls? No, but the polls are no longer legit measures.

What is happening is exactly what I said would happen long ago. Sanders has always been ahead. The polls have shown what those running the polls have wanted them to show. I noted that when it comes right down to it the polls would change to actual numbers as those doing the polling doesn't want egg on their face.

Polling has become a part of the cult mentality in politics.

so what you are saying is you can't prove it, you just feel it.

It's happening.