Democrat sues god

alan1

Gold Member
Dec 13, 2008
18,868
4,358
245
Shoveling the ashes
BBC NEWS | Americas | Legal case against God dismissed

Legal case against God dismissed

The plaintiff argued an omniscient God would know of the lawsuit

A US judge has thrown out a case against God, ruling that because the defendant has no address, legal papers cannot be served.

The suit was launched by Nebraska state senator Ernie Chambers, who said he might appeal against the ruling.

He sought a permanent injunction to prevent the "death, destruction and terrorisation" caused by God.

Judge Marlon Polk said in his ruling that a plaintiff must have access to the defendant for a case to proceed.

"Given that this court finds that there can never be service effectuated on the named defendant this action will be dismissed with prejudice," Judge Polk wrote in his ruling.

Mr Chambers cannot refile the suit but may appeal.

'God knows everything'

Mr Chambers sued God last year. He said God had threatened him and the people of Nebraska and had inflicted "widespread death, destruction and terrorisation of millions upon millions of the Earth's inhabitants".

He said he would carefully consider Judge Polk's ruling before deciding whether to appeal.

The court, Mr Chambers said, had acknowledged the existence of God and "a consequence of that acknowledgement is a recognition of God's omniscience".

"Since God knows everything," he reasoned, "God has notice of this lawsuit."

Mr Chambers, a state senator for 38 years, said he filed the suit to make the point that "anyone can sue anyone else, even God"

The democrats, hard at work making the US a safe place.
 
okay! that does it. I can't take anymore.. I gotta go to bed.. Nite god. Glad you didn't have to get an attorney.. :)
 
The democrats, hard at work making the US a safe place.

Because one person filing suit represented "democrats"? lol....

Was pretty funny, though. The judge said he was going to dismiss the case because the papers were never served on G-d.

The plaintiff's argument was, heck...he's everywhere and knows this case is going on".

I thought it was pretty clever... but it was right to toss it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top