Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
/——-/ Nadler looks like he colluded with 500 pounds of FluffernutterYeah, I saw Nadler on MTP, he and they are definitely not letting "muh collusion" go.
Despite it being a failing strategy, they simply are not going to let go.
Nadler = Big Nose Rat Ears Fat Ass. Who are the Big Nose Rat Ears Colluding with? Oh that's right we already know
Collusion is not a crime, retard.Unlike your existence, collusion is not a crime.
Go back to bed........LOL
All Democrats had to do to win the White House was not act insane.....
Top-Ranking Democrat Says Mueller Report Doesn’t Matter — ‘We Know There Was Collusion’
All Democrats had to do to win the White House was not act insane.....
Top-Ranking Democrat Says Mueller Report Doesn’t Matter — ‘We Know There Was Collusion’
Your link:
"Nadler’s response made it clear that Congressional Democrats are likely moving forward with any number of investigations — in spite of warnings from Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell regarding the possible consequences of 'presidential harassment.'"
Hopefully, rich Mitch will bet his Senate seat on the integrity of Donald Trump since regardless of whether or not a sitting president can be indicted, there's no shortage of evidence for Trump's attempts to obstruct justice:
Laying out the obstruction of justice case against President Trump
"The first federal statute defining obstruction of justice was passed in 1831 and several have been added over the years to criminalize such conduct.
"Today, the authors argue, 'President Trump faces the possibility of criminal liability for obstructing justice under three different theories.'
"The first is the obstruction of a proceeding such as congressional proceeding or a grand jury proceeding.
"The second is witness intimidation, and the third is conspiracy.
"The clearest example of Trump possibly working to obstruct a proceeding is, obviously, his firing of FBI Director James Comey—an action Trump’s former strategist Steve Bannon called, 'the biggest mistake maybe in modern political history.'"
All Democrats had to do to win the White House was not act insane.....
Top-Ranking Democrat Says Mueller Report Doesn’t Matter — ‘We Know There Was Collusion’
Your link:
"Nadler’s response made it clear that Congressional Democrats are likely moving forward with any number of investigations — in spite of warnings from Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell regarding the possible consequences of 'presidential harassment.'"
Hopefully, rich Mitch will bet his Senate seat on the integrity of Donald Trump since regardless of whether or not a sitting president can be indicted, there's no shortage of evidence for Trump's attempts to obstruct justice:
Laying out the obstruction of justice case against President Trump
"The first federal statute defining obstruction of justice was passed in 1831 and several have been added over the years to criminalize such conduct.
"Today, the authors argue, 'President Trump faces the possibility of criminal liability for obstructing justice under three different theories.'
"The first is the obstruction of a proceeding such as congressional proceeding or a grand jury proceeding.
"The second is witness intimidation, and the third is conspiracy.
"The clearest example of Trump possibly working to obstruct a proceeding is, obviously, his firing of FBI Director James Comey—an action Trump’s former strategist Steve Bannon called, 'the biggest mistake maybe in modern political history.'"
Why was firing Comey obstruction of justice?
Collusion is not a crime, retard.
/——-/ I love the smell of Lib desperation in the morning.The next big item on the plate is a month or two away.
The release of the DOJ's IG report.
That ain't gonna end well for the Dems, either
Dang, and I thought only my dog had OCD.Collusion is not a crime, retard.
On post #11 I wrote.......
................since "collusion" is not yet a crime.....just scum bag ethic..........
Soooo, what does this Trump ass licker responds with?????
(check above.........what an idiot......LOL)
All Democrats had to do to win the White House was not act insane.....
Top-Ranking Democrat Says Mueller Report Doesn’t Matter — ‘We Know There Was Collusion’
Your link:
"Nadler’s response made it clear that Congressional Democrats are likely moving forward with any number of investigations — in spite of warnings from Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell regarding the possible consequences of 'presidential harassment.'"
Hopefully, rich Mitch will bet his Senate seat on the integrity of Donald Trump since regardless of whether or not a sitting president can be indicted, there's no shortage of evidence for Trump's attempts to obstruct justice:
Laying out the obstruction of justice case against President Trump
"The first federal statute defining obstruction of justice was passed in 1831 and several have been added over the years to criminalize such conduct.
"Today, the authors argue, 'President Trump faces the possibility of criminal liability for obstructing justice under three different theories.'
"The first is the obstruction of a proceeding such as congressional proceeding or a grand jury proceeding.
"The second is witness intimidation, and the third is conspiracy.
"The clearest example of Trump possibly working to obstruct a proceeding is, obviously, his firing of FBI Director James Comey—an action Trump’s former strategist Steve Bannon called, 'the biggest mistake maybe in modern political history.'"
Why was firing Comey obstruction of justice?
Obstruction of justice requires "an obstructive act undertaken with corrupt intent and having the requisite connection to a grand jury or congressional proceeding."Why was firing Comey obstruction of justice?
All Democrats had to do to win the White House was not act insane.....
Hey nat, did you edit a post? This is what Independent actually posted, i read it live too.Collusion is not a crime, retard.
On post #11 I wrote.......
................since "collusion" is not yet a crime.....just scum bag ethic..........
Soooo, what does this Trump ass licker responds with?????
(check above.........what an idiot......LOL)
All Democrats had to do to win the White House was not act insane.....
Top-Ranking Democrat Says Mueller Report Doesn’t Matter — ‘We Know There Was Collusion’
Your link:
"Nadler’s response made it clear that Congressional Democrats are likely moving forward with any number of investigations — in spite of warnings from Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell regarding the possible consequences of 'presidential harassment.'"
Hopefully, rich Mitch will bet his Senate seat on the integrity of Donald Trump since regardless of whether or not a sitting president can be indicted, there's no shortage of evidence for Trump's attempts to obstruct justice:
Laying out the obstruction of justice case against President Trump
"The first federal statute defining obstruction of justice was passed in 1831 and several have been added over the years to criminalize such conduct.
"Today, the authors argue, 'President Trump faces the possibility of criminal liability for obstructing justice under three different theories.'
"The first is the obstruction of a proceeding such as congressional proceeding or a grand jury proceeding.
"The second is witness intimidation, and the third is conspiracy.
"The clearest example of Trump possibly working to obstruct a proceeding is, obviously, his firing of FBI Director James Comey—an action Trump’s former strategist Steve Bannon called, 'the biggest mistake maybe in modern political history.'"
Why was firing Comey obstruction of justice?
Obstruction of justice requires "an obstructive act undertaken with corrupt intent and having the requisite connection to a grand jury or congressional proceeding."Why was firing Comey obstruction of justice?
Trump's public conduct, including his demand of loyalty from James Comey, Trumps request that Comey "see his way clear" to letting NSA Adviser Michael Flynn go, his firing of Comey and other statements are similar to conduct that has previously supported federal obstruction charges and convictions.
Presidential obstruction of justice: The case of Donald J. Trump
which is 57 more bills than these stupid dem will introduce as legislation in the current congress.They keep it up, Trump is going to win all 57 states in '20
All Democrats had to do to win the White House was not act insane.....
Top-Ranking Democrat Says Mueller Report Doesn’t Matter — ‘We Know There Was Collusion’
Your link:
"Nadler’s response made it clear that Congressional Democrats are likely moving forward with any number of investigations — in spite of warnings from Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell regarding the possible consequences of 'presidential harassment.'"
Hopefully, rich Mitch will bet his Senate seat on the integrity of Donald Trump since regardless of whether or not a sitting president can be indicted, there's no shortage of evidence for Trump's attempts to obstruct justice:
Laying out the obstruction of justice case against President Trump
"The first federal statute defining obstruction of justice was passed in 1831 and several have been added over the years to criminalize such conduct.
"Today, the authors argue, 'President Trump faces the possibility of criminal liability for obstructing justice under three different theories.'
"The first is the obstruction of a proceeding such as congressional proceeding or a grand jury proceeding.
"The second is witness intimidation, and the third is conspiracy.
"The clearest example of Trump possibly working to obstruct a proceeding is, obviously, his firing of FBI Director James Comey—an action Trump’s former strategist Steve Bannon called, 'the biggest mistake maybe in modern political history.'"
All Democrats had to do to win the White House was not act insane.....
Top-Ranking Democrat Says Mueller Report Doesn’t Matter — ‘We Know There Was Collusion’
