Most people had probably only heard of Donald Trump during the more recent Republican primaries. Many appear to have been Democrats, all 78,000 or so of them. Clinton won the popular vote, likely less well-known to voters than now President Trump.
Now there are lots of Democratic presidential aspirants gaining name recognition. Notably, so far: Vice President Biden is not one of them(?). So all of a sudden, there is an appearance of cohesion building around actual issues. Former Rep, Senator Hillebrand, maybe summarizes the various options most concisely.
What does Kirsten Gillibrand believe? Where the candidate stands on 11 issues
Many might wonder if arithmetic is in play. Senators Sanders and Harris are doing old-history math. Apparently the option is to borrow from Uncle China, some more. The lesser well known are willing to opt for Single Payer Health Coverage--so equal amount arithmetic for everyone(?). Then the newer concept of "Debt-Free" college coverage is in play. Sanders and Harris tend to full-federal college funding, (of students, or of teachers): Reliant on China. Hillebrand and O'Rourke tend to low interest or zero interest tuition loans, and maybe grants. To be sensible: Those would likely have to be equal amount limits.
Nigeria has no collateral, low-interest loans for Micro-businesses. Anyone sees what could easily drift on in.
Fixed Percentage usury arithmetic, like in Matt 25:14-30: Is arithmetic that discriminates against those with less. Equal Amount arithmetic--Matthew 20:1-16--was available in Obama's "Make Work Pay," Refundable Income Tax Credit--regardless if the taxpayers had worked all the year or not. That could have been indexed, (helping repay China), The Republicans took that away instead. The lesser well-known Democratic candidates are steering away from the China-Reliant kinds of policies: Arithmetic.
Accounting is apparently not to be said a Republican strong suit--with a nod from the liberal university educated.
New faces with common agenda are now in play for 2020: Arithmetic.
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Even beads and trinkets are in the eye of the beholder: Aka Manhattan!)
Now there are lots of Democratic presidential aspirants gaining name recognition. Notably, so far: Vice President Biden is not one of them(?). So all of a sudden, there is an appearance of cohesion building around actual issues. Former Rep, Senator Hillebrand, maybe summarizes the various options most concisely.
What does Kirsten Gillibrand believe? Where the candidate stands on 11 issues
Many might wonder if arithmetic is in play. Senators Sanders and Harris are doing old-history math. Apparently the option is to borrow from Uncle China, some more. The lesser well known are willing to opt for Single Payer Health Coverage--so equal amount arithmetic for everyone(?). Then the newer concept of "Debt-Free" college coverage is in play. Sanders and Harris tend to full-federal college funding, (of students, or of teachers): Reliant on China. Hillebrand and O'Rourke tend to low interest or zero interest tuition loans, and maybe grants. To be sensible: Those would likely have to be equal amount limits.
Nigeria has no collateral, low-interest loans for Micro-businesses. Anyone sees what could easily drift on in.
Fixed Percentage usury arithmetic, like in Matt 25:14-30: Is arithmetic that discriminates against those with less. Equal Amount arithmetic--Matthew 20:1-16--was available in Obama's "Make Work Pay," Refundable Income Tax Credit--regardless if the taxpayers had worked all the year or not. That could have been indexed, (helping repay China), The Republicans took that away instead. The lesser well-known Democratic candidates are steering away from the China-Reliant kinds of policies: Arithmetic.
Accounting is apparently not to be said a Republican strong suit--with a nod from the liberal university educated.
New faces with common agenda are now in play for 2020: Arithmetic.
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Even beads and trinkets are in the eye of the beholder: Aka Manhattan!)