“Declare the Rightful Winner or…Have a New Election” – President Trump on the FBI Covering Up Hunter’s Laptop and Altering 2020 Election

[Marener]

You mean like Row vs Wade? Or Rickard vs. Filburn?

Interesting that you attack Major Questions Doctrine when all it really states is that congress needs to be clear when seeding power to the executive branch. That has a MUCH clearer connection with the constitution than the 2 listed.

Nope. Congress is already clear. What Major Questions Doctrine says is that they have to be explicit. The difference is important. By any rational reading of the law, Congress already gave the executive the authority to do these things. SCOTUS then demands that Congress spell it out explicitly. If the executive action violated the actual text, it wouldnt be a problem. The executive action would be illegal. SCOTUS just placed ANOTHER legislative hurdle for no reason other than to stop political opponents from doing things they don’t like.

Which is stupid. Really stupid.

It’s also extremely manipulator. What is a major question? Who knows! Whatever the conservative justices don’t want to happen.

 

[FA_Q2]

You have to have someone bring it up to a judge... and the GOP are afraid.....

Afraid of what?

Your fist claim is that EOs cannot be unconstitutional. Now you are backing away from that claim. Now it is they are afraid to bring it to court. Bring what to court?

The EO mentioned WAS brought up in court. And found unconstitutional.

 

[CowboyTed]

Waltz in the door early, click on the news feed--boom, there the article is, first on the feed. So let me get this all straight,

"More than a year after the story appeared, the Washington Post conducted its own analysis and concluded the laptop and some emails were likely to be authentic - but the majority of data could not be verified due to "sloppy handling of the data".

Zuckerberg tells Rogan FBI warning prompted Biden laptop story censorship

In an interview with Joe Rogan, Mark Zuckerberg says the story was flagged after an FBI warning.

www.bbc.com

The Hunter Biden laptop. Facebook was "cautious", the story seemed to "fit the pattern". And honestly, the whole thing just reeks of amateurism, "sloppy handling of data"--are you kidding me? What does that even mean?

So, the entire underpinning of this whole, "must immediately install Trump as king" or hold a new election, is the whole laptop bullshit. Then we attach on, "information that was suppressed"--come on. Seriously--either declare an election as null and void, "anoint a new president", the rightful president; or just declare it void and hold a nue urn, yeah--a new one; would be a first in American history. Actually, first in a new America, because liberty will be dead.

Oh, and Trump is out there, "yeah, take to the streets, Lindsey Graham sent jah". Hey, can someone tell me about those BLM riots. I mean can someone just not stand up--no, no,.

Wake up, Clean up, Stand up. Stop this madness.

"sloppy handling of the data"
Means the laptop hard drive had been compromised. The question is why? Why compromise the laptop at all...

Any way:
Soon after that period of inactivity — and months after the laptop itself had been taken into FBI custody — three new folders were created on the drive. Dated Sept. 1 and 2, 2020, they bore the names “Desktop Documents,” “Biden Burisma” and “Hunter. Burisma Documents.”
Williams also found records on the drive that indicated someone may have accessed the drive from a West Coast location in October 2020, little more than a week after the first New York Post stories on Hunter Biden’s laptop appeared.
Over the next few days, somebody created three additional folders on the drive, titled, “Mail,” “Salacious Pics Package” and “Big Guy File” — an apparent reference to Joe Biden.
Attempts to verify the emails relied mainly on a technology called DKIM, which stands for DomainKeys Identified Mail. DKIM is a cryptographic technology used by Google and some other email services to verify the identities of senders.

The evidence was seriously compromised...

 

[Rambunctious]

Afraid of what?

Your fist claim is that EOs cannot be unconstitutional. Now you are backing away from that claim. Now it is they are afraid to bring it to court. Bring what to court?

The EO mentioned WAS brought up in court. And found unconstitutional.

I'm not backing away from anything... an unconstitutional executive order can be challenged and blocked if the opposition wants to block it....