Decision 2020

What's your choice for 2020?


  • Total voters
    4
WTF ? Why do we have to choose one or the other? can't we continue to have both?

I've gotten used to our uniquely American brand of Social Fascist Plutocracy and don't feel like changing at this point.
It seems crazy, but Tom Steyer may be the most centrist of any of them in either party.
:eek:

Nah, IMHO Uncle Joe is pretty "centrist", he just has to put on show for the far left wing dingbats in his party from time to time.

IMHO Tom Steyer is one of those far left dingbats that Joe has to put on a show for.

Not that I'd ever vote for either one of these dickweeds.
 
STUPID QUESTION ALERT....


One cannot be FASCIST without first being SOCIALIST....




NAZI = National SOCIALIST Party
 
At first glance, I see a very stupid poll that suggests anyone who isn't a socialist is implied to be a fascist, and that is bullshit. Fascism is about total gov't control, something the Right is obviously not for. Similarly, anyone who isn't a fascist is implied to be a socialist, and that bullshit too.

That's not the point at all. I'm not trying to imply that anyone who isn't a socialist is a fascist, nor that anyone who isn't a fascist is a socialist. I'm pretty sure most Americans are neither. But that's the choice our two-party death spiral is presenting us.

I'm voting neither.

When you present a poll with only two choices and ask who are you voting for in 2020, you are implying that whoever a person votes for between the two supports Fascism or Socialism.
Yep. Less of two evils is still evil. These are the choices the major parties are driving toward. The only sane thing to do is to say no.

But dude! The lesser of 2 evils is still LESS EVIL! You know it's gonna be one or the other, how do you not vote for the lesser of 2 evils? Hell's bells man, I've been voting for the lesser of 2 evils since Reagan, it's irresponsible not to vote for the least evil candidate.
 
National Socialism isn't Facism, Facism is Fascim.


Wow, just how DUMB are these idiot socialists who support

GUN CONTROL
STATE SPONSORED ABORTION
STATE SPONSORED DNA DISCRIMINATION
SOCIALISM
USING A BIASED/CONTROLLED MEDIA TO LIE TO THE PUBLIC


When a Democrat calls someone else a "fascist," that Democrat admits to having an IQ under 10.
 
National Socialism isn't Facism, Facism is Fascim.


Wow, just how DUMB are these idiot socialists who support

GUN CONTROL
STATE SPONSORED ABORTION
STATE SPONSORED DNA DISCRIMINATION
SOCIALISM
USING A BIASED/CONTROLLED MEDIA TO LIE TO THE PUBLIC


When a Democrat calls someone else a "fascist," that Democrat admits to having an IQ under 10.

Uh-Huh, that still doesn't make fascism and socialism synonymous.

One of the indispensable attributes of socialism is public ownership of means of production, whereas fascism promotes private ownership and government control of the means of production; from an economic standpoint National Socialism wasn't socialist at all.

Of course both of the American Political Crime Families have attributes in common with both socialism and fascism, so for members of either party to call anyone a "socialist" or a "fascist" is hypocritical in the extreme.
 
nor do we all bow to the Queen


Donna Brazile: Clinton campaign was a 'cult'


""It was a cult," she said on MSNBC. "I felt like it was a cult. You could not penetrate them.""

And the DNC disenfranchised the entire state of Iowa to get her to be the nominee....


Democrats "bow" to the cause of STEALING from the taxpayer...
For the most part Democrats now days are a scourge but we have some Republicans that are too. That is the fault of the people for letting it get that far.
 
socialism is public ownership of means of production, whereas fascism promotes private ownership


You are confusing socialism with communism. Many countries that are socialist have a private sector.

But what is really funny is your quest to claim being socialist is not a pre-requisite for being fascist. IT IS. If you don't support socialism, you cannot be fascist. That truth makes Dems with IQs under 10 really angry....
 
WTF ? Why do we have to choose one or the other? can't we continue to have both?

I've gotten used to our uniquely American brand of Social Fascist Plutocracy and don't feel like changing at this point.
It seems crazy, but Tom Steyer may be the most centrist of any of them in either party.
:eek:

Nah, IMHO Uncle Joe is pretty "centrist", he just has to put on show for the far left wing dingbats in his party from time to time.

IMHO Tom Steyer is one of those far left dingbats that Joe has to put on a show for.

Not that I'd ever vote for either one of these dickweeds.
If Joe can stay awake he's probably their best shot. The gop's entire strategy is to go "AOC squad socialist, open borders, raise all taxes, give money to Mexicans, Mexicans rapists"
 
socialism is public ownership of means of production, whereas fascism promotes private ownership


You are confusing socialism with communism. Many countries that are socialist have a private sector.
Er.. no... socialism is lower stage communism, whereby socialism begins the process of public ownership of the means of production as a pathway to the abolition of private property and the withering away of that state (Communism).

Read your Karl Marx.


But what is really funny is your question to claim being socialist is not a pre-requisite for being fascist. IT IS. If you don't support socialism, you cannot be fascist. That truth makes Dems with IQs under 10 really angry....

Uh-huh, whatever you say, far be it from me to interfere with someones right to remain willfully ignorant. :rolleyes:
 
At first glance, I see a very stupid poll that suggests anyone who isn't a socialist is implied to be a fascist, and that is bullshit. Fascism is about total gov't control, something the Right is obviously not for. Similarly, anyone who isn't a fascist is implied to be a socialist, and that bullshit too.

That's not the point at all. I'm not trying to imply that anyone who isn't a socialist is a fascist, nor that anyone who isn't a fascist is a socialist. I'm pretty sure most Americans are neither. But that's the choice our two-party death spiral is presenting us.

I'm voting neither.

When you present a poll with only two choices and ask who are you voting for in 2020, you are implying that whoever a person votes for between the two supports Fascism or Socialism.
Yep. Less of two evils is still evil. These are the choices the major parties are driving toward. The only sane thing to do is to say no.

But dude! The lesser of 2 evils is still LESS EVIL! You know it's gonna be one or the other, how do you not vote for the lesser of 2 evils? Hell's bells man, I've been voting for the lesser of 2 evils since Reagan, it's irresponsible not to vote for the least evil candidate.

If we're so beat down we're willingly voting for evil, I can't care which evil wins. We're already fucked.
 
201b547ab1d9b1b4b349dd2da6eeef37.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So Billy outs himself as a socialist. Got it

I am not afraid of Socialism, unlike you.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
then why do you live here?
 
201b547ab1d9b1b4b349dd2da6eeef37.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So Billy outs himself as a socialist. Got it

I know this is the gop platform for 2020, but the reality is there are no socialists running. W scared everyone that the terrorists were gonna kill us all in 2004, and Obama scared us that Romney was going to offshore the rest of the jobs in 2012. It's all the same.
It's different this time, Bendog. Bernie is every bit a socialist and as even admitted as much with his ideas. He calls it
democratic socialism....thing is there is no such thing as "democratic socialism".
when the press has caved, there is no accountability
 
I know this is the gop platform for 2020, but the reality is there are no socialists running. W scared everyone that the terrorists were gonna kill us all in 2004, and Obama scared us that Romney was going to offshore the rest of the jobs in 2012. It's all the same.
It's different this time, Bendog. Bernie is every bit a socialist and as even admitted as much with his ideas. He calls it
democratic socialism....thing is there is no such thing as "democratic socialism".

Bernie is a decent man. I’ve talked to him many times in the past. Trump is not a decent man. He is a racist asshole who will not be getting my vote.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah, yeah....racism racism. A bunch of BS....you all talk like it's real, but never can get to the meat of real racism.
It's okay, you like Bernie and his politics. Bernie would be a decent man if he was a plumber or a clerk at a bank.
As a politician, he's dangerous IMO.

He is nowhere near as dangerous as Trump.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
How can you say that?
If Bernie was president, he would be bent on changing our form of government to start lining up with globalization.
That does not mean he would succeed. The Republicans would make sure of that.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
WTF ? Why do we have to choose one or the other? can't we continue to have both?

I've gotten used to our uniquely American brand of Social Fascist Plutocracy and don't feel like changing at this point.
It seems crazy, but Tom Steyer may be the most centrist of any of them in either party.
:eek:

Nah, IMHO Uncle Joe is pretty "centrist", he just has to put on show for the far left wing dingbats in his party from time to time.

IMHO Tom Steyer is one of those far left dingbats that Joe has to put on a show for.

Not that I'd ever vote for either one of these dickweeds.
If Joe can stay awake he's probably their best shot. The gop's entire strategy is to go "AOC squad socialist, open borders, raise all taxes, give money to Mexicans, Mexicans rapists"
and that's wrong? hmmmmm spot on to me.
 

Forum List

Back
Top