DeBlasio says he will PERMANENTLY shut down churches and synagogues who do not comply

[OnePercenter]

At that point they would be subject to arrest if they continue to violate.

^^^Another Dimsocialist Window Licker who has never heard of the Constitution^^^^^

National, state and local emergencies have been declared. At that point a new level of authority is enacted, which allows the local executive to enact rules which impinge on known rights, as long as the "least restrictive" method is used, and there is a "compelling government interest" to do so.

As often cited, No yelling "fire" in a crowded movie theater (unless there's an actual fire"

Thanks for proving you know nothing about the Constitution...............again.

Being Canadian, how much do you know about the US constitution?

 

[rich stacy]

Cite the USSC decision that says a mayor can unilaterally shut down churches forever.

GO!

Civil forfeiture in the United States - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Civil forfeiture in the United States, also called civil asset forfeiture or civil judicial forfeiture,is a process in which law enforcement officers take assets from persons suspected of involvement with crime or illegal activity

Civil forfeitures are subject to the "excessive fines" clause of the U.S. Constitution's 8th amendment, both at a federal level and, as determined by the 2019 Supreme Court case, Timbs v. Indiana, at the state and local level

Supreme Court in United States v. Bajakajian, which decreed that a criminal forfeiture could be considered as both a type of fine and a punishment, while a civil forfeiture was not intended as a punishment of a person but rather a "legal fiction of punishing the property". As a result, the court decreed that civil forfeitures that served as remedial were not considered as a type of fine.

The United States Supreme Court has upheld the principle of civil asset forfeiture at the federal level. The Court ruled in Austin v. United States (1993) that such civil forfeiture, treated as punitive actions, are subject to the Excessive Fines clause of the Eighth Amendment. The Supreme Court ruled in Timbs v. Indiana (2019) that protection against excessive fees in civil forfeiture is also incorporated against state and local governmen

 

[Nostra]

Non-compliance could also bring additional action, including fines and “potentially closing the building permanently.”

Once again, you demonstrate your ignorance.

DId you see the "potentially" clause?

Potentially - with the capacity to develop or happen in the future.
Use the adverb potentially to describe something that could happen or might be true.

Cite the USSC decision that says a mayor can unilaterally shut down churches forever.

GO!

 

[Nostra]

Cite the USSC decision that says a mayor can unilaterally shut down churches forever.

GO!

Civil forfeiture in the United States - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Civil forfeiture in the United States, also called civil asset forfeiture or civil judicial forfeiture,is a process in which law enforcement officers take assets from persons suspected of involvement with crime or illegal activity

Civil forfeitures are subject to the "excessive fines" clause of the U.S. Constitution's 8th amendment, both at a federal level and, as determined by the 2019 Supreme Court case, Timbs v. Indiana, at the state and local level

Supreme Court in United States v. Bajakajian, which decreed that a criminal forfeiture could be considered as both a type of fine and a punishment, while a civil forfeiture was not intended as a punishment of a person but rather a "legal fiction of punishing the property". As a result, the court decreed that civil forfeitures that served as remedial were not considered as a type of fine.

The United States Supreme Court has upheld the principle of civil asset forfeiture at the federal level. The Court ruled in Austin v. United States (1993) that such civil forfeiture, treated as punitive actions, are subject to the Excessive Fines clause of the Eighth Amendment. The Supreme Court ruled in Timbs v. Indiana (2019) that protection against excessive fees in civil forfeiture is also incorporated against state and local governmen

From your link:

Proponents see civil forfeiture as a powerful tool to thwart criminal organizations involved in the illegal drug trade, with $12 billion annual profits,[3] since it allows authorities to seize cash and other assets from suspected narcotics traffickers.

Dismissed, Dummy.

 

[rich stacy]

Thanks for proving you know nothing about the Constitution...............again.

Being Canadian, how much do you know about the US constitution?

He may think from his read, that the 6th amendment means the government has to give everybody a lawyer.

 

[rich stacy]

Cite the USSC decision that says a mayor can unilaterally shut down churches forever.

GO!

See civil forfeiture (previously posted)

 

[rich stacy]

From your link:

Proponents see civil forfeiture as a powerful tool to thwart criminal organizations involved in the illegal drug trade, with $12 billion annual profits,[3] since it allows authorities to seize cash and other assets from suspected narcotics traffickers.

Dismissed, Dummy.

The law doesn't restrict the crimes for which it applies. It's used to take cars, houses, boats, etc. Exampled by if you violate DUI laws repeatedly, they can seize your car.

 

[OnePercenter]

Thanks for proving you know nothing about the Constitution...............again.

Being Canadian, how much do you know about the US constitution?

He may think from his read, that the 6th amendment means the government has to give everybody a lawyer.

He doesn't think. The guys a Canadian IRA Putin troll.

 

[Nostra]

Thanks for proving you know nothing about the Constitution...............again.

Being Canadian, how much do you know about the US constitution?

He may think from his read, that the 6th amendment means the government has to give everybody a lawyer.

He doesn't think. The guys a Canadian IRA Putin troll.

I'm Canadian? When did that happen?

 

[Juicin]

He didn’t mention mosques.

What a POS liberal faggot.

De Blasio Threatens to Close Churches, Synagogues 'Permanently' For Holding Services

townhall.com

There has never been a better mayor for New York City than this asshole. You fucks deserve him.

Shelter in place for 5 years you pussies.

Sounds good to me, hahahaha

 

[OKTexas]

So when did executives become legislators?

When they declared an emergncy.

What Emergency Declarations Can (and Canât) Do in a Pandemic

Government emergency powers change the legal landscape and trigger a surge of resources, but they’re not without complications.

www.wired.com

Consequently, the federal governments, states, and cities across America have declared public health emergencies for Covid-19. These powers can trigger a surge in government power and resources, as well as streamline cumbersome legal rules that can impede a rapid response. Most importantly, emergency declarations expand the authority to implement crucial social distancing measures like school closures and public gatherings.

So you have no problem with the suspension of the Constitution by a bunch of wannabe tyrants all over the country, got it.

.

 

[OKTexas]

Cite the USSC decision that says a mayor can unilaterally shut down churches forever.

GO!

Civil forfeiture in the United States - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Civil forfeiture in the United States, also called civil asset forfeiture or civil judicial forfeiture,is a process in which law enforcement officers take assets from persons suspected of involvement with crime or illegal activity

Civil forfeitures are subject to the "excessive fines" clause of the U.S. Constitution's 8th amendment, both at a federal level and, as determined by the 2019 Supreme Court case, Timbs v. Indiana, at the state and local level

Supreme Court in United States v. Bajakajian, which decreed that a criminal forfeiture could be considered as both a type of fine and a punishment, while a civil forfeiture was not intended as a punishment of a person but rather a "legal fiction of punishing the property". As a result, the court decreed that civil forfeitures that served as remedial were not considered as a type of fine.

The United States Supreme Court has upheld the principle of civil asset forfeiture at the federal level. The Court ruled in Austin v. United States (1993) that such civil forfeiture, treated as punitive actions, are subject to the Excessive Fines clause of the Eighth Amendment. The Supreme Court ruled in Timbs v. Indiana (2019) that protection against excessive fees in civil forfeiture is also incorporated against state and local governmen

Cite one civil forfeiture case involving a constitutionally protected activity.

.

 

[OldLady]

Can't the mayor (well, his agencies) revoke their Certificate of Occupancy? He's not actually shutting down a church, he's shutting down the building. There have been plenty of churches without a building before. It would suck out loud if he did that, but his citizens need to comply with the Emergency Orders for the sake of public safety.

 

[blackhawk]

He can try he will get taken to court where he will lose and in the end accomlish nothing other than proving yet again what an idiot he is.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

But where the problem truly is, will continue to remain open.

MIT study: Subways a ‘major disseminator’ of coronavirus in NYC

A new study argues that city subways and buses were a “major disseminator” of the coronavirus in the Big Apple. The paper, by MIT economics professor and physician Jeffrey Harris, point…

nypost.com

web.mit.edu/jeffrey/harris/HarrisJE_WP2_COVID19_NYC_13-Apr-2020.pdf

 

[Unkotare]

Seems like there are faster ways to commit suicide.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

He didn’t mention mosques.

Because there arent any reports of mosques violating the order. Most churches and synagogues are following the order. He is talking to a very specific few, and they know who they are.

Are you arguing it would be okay to say this about, say, a waterpark, but not a church?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Cite one civil forfeiture case involving a constitutionally protected activity

Thats not relevant.

 

[Nostra]

Cite one civil forfeiture case involving a constitutionally protected activity

Thats not relevant.

Not in a Dimsocialist Brown Shirt city run by Nazis.

 

[Ame®icano]

He didn’t mention mosques.

What a POS liberal faggot.

De Blasio Threatens to Close Churches, Synagogues 'Permanently' For Holding Services

townhall.com

There has never been a better mayor for New York City than this asshole. You fucks deserve him.

Shelter in place for 5 years you pussies.

Interesting, no mention of mosque closing during Ramadan that is between April 23 and May 23.