cereal_killer
Platinum Member
I say give Connery a shot. What's the worst that can happen? People disagree and throw in their opinions. I say we give him a chance he seems to sincerely want to judge this fairly.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"It is my intention in this debate to prove Islam's direct historical ties to the Nazis and Hitler...And I've never said that Islam supported the Nazis."So who is winning? There are the facts, the arguments made, and there are the errors or misstatements. All around I enjoy seeing people go at it without the peanut gallery jumping in.
what is the time limit/post limit for the Islam WWII Bull Debate?
i'm done. she hasn't even responded to my posts. she has answered one question, and i had to ask that at least three times.
as for POST#4...
see POST# 54...
http://www.usmessageboard.com/6919602-post54.html
"If I'm trying to prove a point why on earth should I go down paths to prove there were Muslim leaders that didn't support the Nazis.
That's stupid. So of course my presentation is going to be one sided. Good grief."
and yet she constantly claims that her purpose is not to show that muslims supported the NAZIs.
i would certainly think that if you are going to prove some historical connection of islam with the NAZis, it would include muslim leaders and muslim "righteous among the nations". otherwise, it is about islam's support of the NAZIs.
just a note in passing. if people really want this forum to succeed, they may want to look at the so called "debate" that occurred here. this was nothing more than a lecture by a person pursuing an agenda.
later.
This is incorrect. Should you have proof of such, kindly present it and I will recuse myself.
Come on Connery, it is obvious you have a bias towards TD,.
just a note in passing. if people really want this forum to succeed, they may want to look at the so called "debate" that occurred here. this was nothing more than a lecture by a person pursuing an agenda.
later.
gotta say...
this whole thing has gone way past being tiresome...
at this point, I wouldn't even care if there was proof that the Nazi's developed a time machine that allowed Hitler to go back in time so that he could have Mohammad fuck him up the ass...
just a note in passing. if people really want this forum to succeed, they may want to look at the so called "debate" that occurred here. this was nothing more than a lecture by a person pursuing an agenda.
later.
What you fail to do is take responsibility for your part.
Hey asshole, we have that blood. Some of us ran as fast away from shanti Irish ghetto as we could. We are the ones who made the Irish look good
Shanti Irish Man: Look mom I graduated college.
Shanti Irsh mom: So mr smahty pants thinks he;s better than everyone esle?
Shanti Irish Dad: Pour me another drink and watch out for the coppers, they are on to us stealing all the stuff not nailed down at the factory
I guess that was supposed to be humor but it wasn't funny. Smarmy generalizations rarely are.
Please, some of us can live with the naked truth and fuck the myths of the noble shanti
Irish.
I am waiting. Tis ok.
Part of my problem is my husbands home.....lol, bless his soul he loves this. kinfs stulff. He's going to sign me up Moday.
Yeah hes an asshole. Thats why I love him.
We really are idiots out heesjust trying to find truth. And yes. We are morons.
Good evening.
My apologies for my delay. Such is life in the world of snow and sleet.
Where are we now?
well... first, the earth cooled...
and then the dinosaurs came...
but they got too big and fat...
I am waiting. Tis ok.
Part of my problem is my husbands home.....lol, bless his soul he loves this. kinfs stulff. He's going to sign me up Moday.
Yeah hes an asshole. Thats why I love him.
We really are idiots out heesjust trying to find truth. And yes. We are morons.
morons...? hmmm... that's funny... I coulda sworn y'all were cat'licks...
So who is winning? There are the facts, the arguments made, and there are the errors or misstatements. All around I enjoy seeing people go at it without the peanut gallery jumping in.
what is the time limit/post limit for the Islam WWII Bull Debate?
i'm done. she hasn't even responded to my posts. she has answered one question, and i had to ask that at least three times.
as for POST#4...
see POST# 54...
http://www.usmessageboard.com/6919602-post54.html
"If I'm trying to prove a point why on earth should I go down paths to prove there were Muslim leaders that didn't support the Nazis.
That's stupid. So of course my presentation is going to be one sided. Good grief."
and yet she constantly claims that her purpose is not to show that muslims supported the NAZIs.
i would certainly think that if you are going to prove some historical connection of islam with the NAZis, it would include muslim leaders and muslim "righteous among the nations". otherwise, it is about islam's support of the NAZIs.
just a note in passing. if people really want this forum to succeed, they may want to look at the so called "debate" that occurred here. this was nothing more than a lecture by a person pursuing an agenda.
later.
"It is my intention in this debate to prove Islam's direct historical ties to the Nazis and Hitler...And I've never said that Islam supported the Nazis."So who is winning? There are the facts, the arguments made, and there are the errors or misstatements. All around I enjoy seeing people go at it without the peanut gallery jumping in.
what is the time limit/post limit for the Islam WWII Bull Debate?
i'm done. she hasn't even responded to my posts. she has answered one question, and i had to ask that at least three times.
as for POST#4...
see POST# 54...
http://www.usmessageboard.com/6919602-post54.html
"If I'm trying to prove a point why on earth should I go down paths to prove there were Muslim leaders that didn't support the Nazis.
That's stupid. So of course my presentation is going to be one sided. Good grief."
and yet she constantly claims that her purpose is not to show that muslims supported the NAZIs.
i would certainly think that if you are going to prove some historical connection of islam with the NAZis, it would include muslim leaders and muslim "righteous among the nations". otherwise, it is about islam's support of the NAZIs.
just a note in passing. if people really want this forum to succeed, they may want to look at the so called "debate" that occurred here. this was nothing more than a lecture by a person pursuing an agenda.
later.
TD seems to be conflating Arab Muslim support of the Nazis with ties by Islam to Nazis and Hitler. You appeared to go with people who collaborated with Nazis out of self -interest/survival being Nazi supporters.
I wonder if TD would say Christianity had ties to and supported Nazis? I wonder if you would consider the character of Sophie, in Sophie's Choice to be a portrayal of somebody who supported the Nazis because she gave up one of her children to be killed for Nazi purity reasons
What you fail to do is take responsibility for your part.
So what exactly do you want him to take responcibility for, as far as I can see he has been the respocible one so far in this so called debate. He has addressed the concerns of TD in a timely fasion and been more then patient in waiting for her answers of witch she has only provided one, and that was after he asked it at least 3 times !!!
gotta say...
this whole thing has gone way past being tiresome...
at this point, I wouldn't even care if there was proof that the Nazi's developed a time machine that allowed Hitler to go back in time so that he could have Mohammad fuck him up the ass...
I can't beleive that TD did not get the Jeffery Herf reference.