deal me in

There will be more of this type of thing coming out over time. But look, it's the system. Hell, it only became "illegal" for congress to engage in insider trading, like you for example, in 2012. Trump not going to drain the swamp, he's going to divert more water supply into it and swim on in.
 
Fenton Lum said:
There will be more of this type of thing coming out over time. But look, it's the system. Hell, it only became "illegal" for congress to engage in insider trading, like you for example, in 2012. Trump not going to drain the swamp, he's going to divert more water supply into it and swim on in.
Click to expand...
It will be much to the nutters' dismay --- once they are actually able to figure it out --- that the bozo they elected to "drain the swamp" is actually nothing more than a puppet for the old guard republican establishment who once again is firmly in control of the White House. Same old, same old, nutters. Same old, same old.

BUT IT'S THE FAULT OF THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA :crybaby::crybaby::crybaby::crybaby::crybaby::crybaby::crybaby:
 
In 2007, Donald Trump spent $20,000 that belonged to his charity — the Donald J. Trump Foundation — to buy a six-foot-tall portrait of himself during a fundraiser auction at his Mar-a-Lago Club in Florida.

That purchase was reported Sunday by The Washington Post. Since then, the portrait has been the center of a mystery: What did Trump do with the painting after he bought it?

If Trump did not give the painting to a charity — or find a way to use it for charitable purposes — he may have violated IRS rules against “self-dealing,” which prohibit nonprofit leaders from spending charity money on themselves.

On Wednesday, a new clue emerged. A former production manager for the portrait’s painter told The Post that he had shipped the painting — at the request of Trump’s wife, Melania — to Trump National Golf Club Westchester in Briarcliff Manor, N.Y.

Jody Young, the painter’s former manager, said that at the time he had spoken directly to Melania Trump about how the painting would be framed and displayed.

Her plan was “to hang it in either the boardroom or the conference room of the club,” Young said.

It is still unclear where the painting is now, or how long — if any time at all — it was on display at the private golf club. But tax experts say that an arrangement like the one described by Young could violate Internal Revenue Service rules.

``````````

of course that pos bought a painting of himself and hung it at his golf club ... it's all about him, everything is about him

fuck him.
 
Missourian said:
Siete is 'apparently' an idiot, for not recognizing that the wiggle word 'apparently' negates the validity of the entire article.
Click to expand...
How's this for apparent?

In one section of the form, the IRS asked if the Trump Foundation had transferred “income or assets to a disqualified person.” A disqualified person, in this context, might be Trump — the foundation’s president — or a member of his family, or a Trump-owned business.

The foundation checked “yes.”


Another line on the form asked if the Trump Foundation had engaged in any acts of self-dealing in prior years.

The Trump Foundation checked “yes” again.
 
Missourian said:
Siete is 'apparently' an idiot, for not recognizing that the wiggle word 'apparently' negates the validity of the entire article.
Click to expand...
I'm curious, if there were no "apparently" and the claims were true and proven, what would you say?
 
Nothing will ever be as bad as Clinton Foundation accepting millions of foreign government donations for pay for play WHILE Hillary was leading the state department.
 
The VOR said:
Missourian said:
Siete is 'apparently' an idiot, for not recognizing that the wiggle word 'apparently' negates the validity of the entire article.
Click to expand...
How's this for apparent?

In one section of the form, the IRS asked if the Trump Foundation had transferred “income or assets to a disqualified person.” A disqualified person, in this context, might be Trump — the foundation’s president — or a member of his family, or a Trump-owned business.

The foundation checked “yes.”


Another line on the form asked if the Trump Foundation had engaged in any acts of self-dealing in prior years.

The Trump Foundation checked “yes” again.
Click to expand...


Siete said:
Trump Foundation apparently admits to violating ban on ‘self-dealing,’ new filing to IRS shows
Click to expand...

The author of the article isn't as certain as you are...apparently.
 
Slade3200 said:
Missourian said:
Siete is 'apparently' an idiot, for not recognizing that the wiggle word 'apparently' negates the validity of the entire article.
Click to expand...
I'm curious, if there were no "apparently" and the claims were true and proven, what would you say?
Click to expand...

About the same thing a Democrat would say about the "Hillary stole the furniture from the White House".

I'd say this was pretty nitpicky. One charity gives money to another charity for a lawsuit over fines from a flagpole location. One charity gives money to another charity for a lawsuit over a hole-in-one contest. One charity gives to another charity $20,000 for a $400 helmet. It wouldn't be a story if it wasn't for the MSM needing to print something anti-Trump.
 
of course trump can do no wrong

never could, never will

day one is now on a 100 day plan ..

:lmao:

trumpbots are pathetic little creatures.
 
Missourian said:
Slade3200 said:
Missourian said:
Siete is 'apparently' an idiot, for not recognizing that the wiggle word 'apparently' negates the validity of the entire article.
Click to expand...
I'm curious, if there were no "apparently" and the claims were true and proven, what would you say?
Click to expand...

About the same thing a Democrat would say about the "Hillary stole the furniture from the White House".

I'd say this was pretty nitpicky. One charity gives money to another charity for a lawsuit over fines from a flagpole location. One charity gives money to another charity for a lawsuit over a hole-in-one contest. One charity gives to another charity $20,000 for a $400 helmet. It wouldn't be a story if it wasn't for the MSM needing to print something anti-Trump.
Click to expand...
Do you think the Clinton Foundation accusations are "nitpicky" as well?
 
If the Earth were square, the stars made of cream cheese, the heavens filled with Cool Whip and I had a penis shaped like a cowbell...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Nancy Pelosi's Democrat Challenger: We're Not A National Party, We Are A Coastal Party

< Previous Thread

President Elect Donald J Trump; Demagogic Genius

Next Thread >

Similar threads

P
Kathy Griffin facing dismal crowds
2 3
Replies
49
Views
785
Carl in Michigan
Carl in Michigan
JGalt
President Trump dares judge in Alvin Bragg case to jail him for violating gag order
19 20 21
Replies
401
Views
5K
LeftofLeft
LeftofLeft
White 6
File Taxes today. Unusually enough, I am Pissed
2
Replies
33
Views
760
Redheaded Stranger
Redheaded Stranger
berg80
“Incomprehensible”: Experts say Trump’s $175 million bond makes no sense
6 7 8
Replies
147
Views
2K
surada
S
Doc7505
“GET ME A DEAL!”
Replies
13
Views
300
Doc7505
Doc7505

Latest Discussions

DGS49
Look at what the Left Fears:
5 6 7
Replies
135
Views
617
Vrenn
V
A
What are you listening to now
37 38 39
Replies
762
Views
25K
RhodyPatriot
RhodyPatriot
ClosedCaption
Political Cartoon
9280 9281 9282
Replies
186K
Views
2M
two_iron
two_iron
M
Zone1 "Saying "White men are the number one terrorist threat" is racist".
2 3
Replies
56
Views
243
frigidweirdo
frigidweirdo
Crepitus
trump tries to lower expectation for the debate.
Replies
3
Views
14
LordBrownTrout
LordBrownTrout
View more…

Forum List

Back
Top