Darren Wilson's lawyer - "Darren will never be a police officer again"

You realize you are deflecting right?

Asking you to back up your no traffic assertion is not deflection
Arguing about the difference between a street and a road is a deflection. Stop being juvenile.

Lol, under juvenile in the dictionary is your photo.

Now, where's the link to there not being any traffic on that street

You made the assertion. Prove you're not a hack and provide the link proving your assertion, or

Go bye bye
You are full of deflections. Have fun going bye bye.

Proof you're full of shit
Still deflecting? I figured.
 
qsxv7cpljiwcinaderna.png


:laugh:
The actual photos of Wilson were all over the TV, showing nothing but a little redness.
The Right relies heavily on PhotoShop, but that's not Wilson.
 
And neither did Wilson.

See the similarity
Yes he did. He even said so.

He said he intentionally tried to run Brown over?

Link or retract
Of course he didnt say that. It would hurt his narrative as good guy. It doesnt make sense to back up to the point where you cant open your car door because the guy is blocking you from opening the door. He tried to run them over and missed. They had to jump back.

You said that he did, then he didn't.

Which

You do realize you are talking out of both sides of your head, right?
No I never said he said "I intentionally tried to run over them" If I did please quote it. I figured this was just another deflection. Thanks for confirming that.
You just said it in post 129. Now you're lying about lying. Pathetic
 
Liberals (the insidious pieces of shit who actually know this was self defense), which are commies more than liberals, do not give one ounce of shit what the facts are in the case.

Just so long as they can push their narrative. As facts come out, they can make it so convoluted to the point where it does not matter. That is all deliberate. They are able to create the race division, and use there narrative to further destroy the "melting pot."

The democrats (socialists who we call liberals) are not interested in a melting pot. They need the divisions. In classes, in races, in genders. Where ever they can. Whatever opportunity to push their utopian myth and use all of their grievances for political gain. They are able to establish themselves as the fairy tale robin hoods by promulgating the notion that republicans are to blame for all of their miseries. It is essential that they have these separations and just as important to have the scapegoat.

Look at how well it works.

Fucking liberals suck, and I hate all of them.
 
Liberals (the insidious pieces of shit who actually know this was self defense), which are commies more than liberals, do not give one ounce of shit what the facts are in the case.

Just so long as they can push their narrative. As facts come out, they can make it so convoluted to the point where it does not matter. That is all deliberate. They are able to create the race division, and use there narrative to further destroy the "melting pot."

The democrats (socialists who we call liberals) are not interested in a melting pot. They need the divisions. In classes, in races, in genders. Where ever they can. Whatever opportunity to push their utopian myth and use all of their grievances for political gain. They are able to establish themselves as the fairy tale robin hoods by promulgating the notion that republicans are to blame for all of their miseries. It is essential that they have these separations and just as important to have the scapegoat.

Look at how well it works.

Fucking liberals suck, and I hate all of them.
So sorry to hear that you hate the Founders of this nation? Time to get the fuck out of my country little man.
 
The actual photos of Wilson were all over the TV, showing nothing but a little redness.
The Right relies heavily on PhotoShop, but that's not Wilson.
I know. I was just laughing at the extent some people go to in order to justify what Wilson did. They also had a false picture of brown circulating with him holding a gun. Lots of monkeyshine going on.
 
Yes he did. He even said so.

He said he intentionally tried to run Brown over?

Link or retract
Of course he didnt say that. It would hurt his narrative as good guy. It doesnt make sense to back up to the point where you cant open your car door because the guy is blocking you from opening the door. He tried to run them over and missed. They had to jump back.

You said that he did, then he didn't.

Which

You do realize you are talking out of both sides of your head, right?
No I never said he said "I intentionally tried to run over them" If I did please quote it. I figured this was just another deflection. Thanks for confirming that.
You just said it in post 129. Now you're lying about lying. Pathetic
Please provide the quote "I intentionally tried to run over them". If you cant then you are pitiful.
 

Listen from 5min in... for about 30sec


Please, do tell how that backs up your assertion.

This is gonna be good

Do I have to draw you a picture? Two boys walking down the middle of the street. Cop pulls up tells them to get off street... they keep walking cop puts car in reverse turns his wheel to angle the car TOWARD THEM OVER THEM AND/OR BLOCK THEM CLOSE ENOUGH FOR THEM TO SHUT THE DOOR WHEN HE OPENS IT. Do I need to video tape a re-enactment for you? Do that to a cop and you will be arrested for ATTEMPTED VEHICULAR HOMICIDE.

Oh he tried blocking them in to stop them? Your really showing how desperate you are. You do realize that?

Yes or no if it was the cops walking in the street and a gangbanger did that with his SUV he's going to jail for attempted vehicular homicide.
 
He said he intentionally tried to run Brown over?

Link or retract
Of course he didnt say that. It would hurt his narrative as good guy. It doesnt make sense to back up to the point where you cant open your car door because the guy is blocking you from opening the door. He tried to run them over and missed. They had to jump back.

You said that he did, then he didn't.

Which

You do realize you are talking out of both sides of your head, right?
No I never said he said "I intentionally tried to run over them" If I did please quote it. I figured this was just another deflection. Thanks for confirming that.
You just said it in post 129. Now you're lying about lying. Pathetic
Please provide the quote "I intentionally tried to run over them". If you cant then you are pitiful.

I just did, jackass.
 
Liberals (the insidious pieces of shit who actually know this was self defense), which are commies more than liberals, do not give one ounce of shit what the facts are in the case.

Just so long as they can push their narrative. As facts come out, they can make it so convoluted to the point where it does not matter. That is all deliberate. They are able to create the race division, and use there narrative to further destroy the "melting pot."

The democrats (socialists who we call liberals) are not interested in a melting pot. They need the divisions. In classes, in races, in genders. Where ever they can. Whatever opportunity to push their utopian myth and use all of their grievances for political gain. They are able to establish themselves as the fairy tale robin hoods by promulgating the notion that republicans are to blame for all of their miseries. It is essential that they have these separations and just as important to have the scapegoat.

Look at how well it works.

Fucking liberals suck, and I hate all of them.
So sorry to hear that you hate the Founders of this nation? Time to get the fuck out of my country little man.

LOL, they were nothing like you or they wouldn't have given us they did.

Liberalism started out as Classical and has devolved into something resembling you.

Most Conservatives are now Classical Liberal.
 

Listen from 5min in... for about 30sec


Please, do tell how that backs up your assertion.

This is gonna be good

Do I have to draw you a picture? Two boys walking down the middle of the street. Cop pulls up tells them to get off street... they keep walking cop puts car in reverse turns his wheel to angle the car TOWARD THEM OVER THEM AND/OR BLOCK THEM CLOSE ENOUGH FOR THEM TO SHUT THE DOOR WHEN HE OPENS IT. Do I need to video tape a re-enactment for you? Do that to a cop and you will be arrested for ATTEMPTED VEHICULAR HOMICIDE.

Oh he tried blocking them in to stop them? Your really showing how desperate you are. You do realize that?

Yes or no if it was the cops walking in the street and a gangbanger did that with his SUV he's going to jail for attempted vehicular homicide.


So your point is that a call went out that two cops stole cigars from a Convenience Store and the Bangers are rolling up to investigate it?

Yes that's how stupid you sound.
 

Listen from 5min in... for about 30sec


Please, do tell how that backs up your assertion.

This is gonna be good

Do I have to draw you a picture? Two boys walking down the middle of the street. Cop pulls up tells them to get off street... they keep walking cop puts car in reverse turns his wheel to angle the car TOWARD THEM OVER THEM AND/OR BLOCK THEM CLOSE ENOUGH FOR THEM TO SHUT THE DOOR WHEN HE OPENS IT. Do I need to video tape a re-enactment for you? Do that to a cop and you will be arrested for ATTEMPTED VEHICULAR HOMICIDE.

Oh he tried blocking them in to stop them? Your really showing how desperate you are. You do realize that?

Yes or no if it was the cops walking in the street and a gangbanger did that with his SUV he's going to jail for attempted vehicular homicide.


So your point is that a call went out that two cops stole cigars from a Convenience Store and the Bangers are rolling up to investigate it?

Yes that's how stupid you sound.

Yes or no there's one set of rules for the cops and another set for everyone else.
 
Liberals (the insidious pieces of shit who actually know this was self defense), which are commies more than liberals, do not give one ounce of shit what the facts are in the case.

Just so long as they can push their narrative. As facts come out, they can make it so convoluted to the point where it does not matter. That is all deliberate. They are able to create the race division, and use there narrative to further destroy the "melting pot."

The democrats (socialists who we call liberals) are not interested in a melting pot. They need the divisions. In classes, in races, in genders. Where ever they can. Whatever opportunity to push their utopian myth and use all of their grievances for political gain. They are able to establish themselves as the fairy tale robin hoods by promulgating the notion that republicans are to blame for all of their miseries. It is essential that they have these separations and just as important to have the scapegoat.

Look at how well it works.

Fucking liberals suck, and I hate all of them.
So sorry to hear that you hate the Founders of this nation? Time to get the fuck out of my country little man.

LOL, they were nothing like you or they wouldn't have given us they did.

Liberalism started out as Classical and has devolved into something resembling you.

Most Conservatives are now Classical Liberal.
No, they're not, nothing like them actually, but the propaganda you swallowed says they are. It's a lie, a flat-out lie, and we don't have Conservatives in this country, we have reactionaries, like those here.
 
Of course he didnt say that. It would hurt his narrative as good guy. It doesnt make sense to back up to the point where you cant open your car door because the guy is blocking you from opening the door. He tried to run them over and missed. They had to jump back.

You said that he did, then he didn't.

Which

You do realize you are talking out of both sides of your head, right?
No I never said he said "I intentionally tried to run over them" If I did please quote it. I figured this was just another deflection. Thanks for confirming that.
You just said it in post 129. Now you're lying about lying. Pathetic
Please provide the quote "I intentionally tried to run over them". If you cant then you are pitiful.

I just did, jackass.
No you didnt. You typed in post 129. Please quote me saying those words if possible. You do know how to use the quote function correct?
 
Liberals (the insidious pieces of shit who actually know this was self defense), which are commies more than liberals, do not give one ounce of shit what the facts are in the case.

Just so long as they can push their narrative. As facts come out, they can make it so convoluted to the point where it does not matter. That is all deliberate. They are able to create the race division, and use there narrative to further destroy the "melting pot."

The democrats (socialists who we call liberals) are not interested in a melting pot. They need the divisions. In classes, in races, in genders. Where ever they can. Whatever opportunity to push their utopian myth and use all of their grievances for political gain. They are able to establish themselves as the fairy tale robin hoods by promulgating the notion that republicans are to blame for all of their miseries. It is essential that they have these separations and just as important to have the scapegoat.

Look at how well it works.

Fucking liberals suck, and I hate all of them.
So sorry to hear that you hate the Founders of this nation? Time to get the fuck out of my country little man.

LOL, they were nothing like you or they wouldn't have given us they did.

Liberalism started out as Classical and has devolved into something resembling you.

Most Conservatives are now Classical Liberal.

Because they were the last group to come around.....:biggrin:
 
Liberals (the insidious pieces of shit who actually know this was self defense), which are commies more than liberals, do not give one ounce of shit what the facts are in the case.

Just so long as they can push their narrative. As facts come out, they can make it so convoluted to the point where it does not matter. That is all deliberate. They are able to create the race division, and use there narrative to further destroy the "melting pot."

The democrats (socialists who we call liberals) are not interested in a melting pot. They need the divisions. In classes, in races, in genders. Where ever they can. Whatever opportunity to push their utopian myth and use all of their grievances for political gain. They are able to establish themselves as the fairy tale robin hoods by promulgating the notion that republicans are to blame for all of their miseries. It is essential that they have these separations and just as important to have the scapegoat.

Look at how well it works.

Fucking liberals suck, and I hate all of them.
So sorry to hear that you hate the Founders of this nation? Time to get the fuck out of my country little man.

LOL, they were nothing like you or they wouldn't have given us they did.

Liberalism started out as Classical and has devolved into something resembling you.

Most Conservatives are now Classical Liberal.
No, they're not, nothing like them actually, but the propaganda you swallowed says they are. It's a lie, a flat-out lie, and we don't have Conservatives in this country, we have reactionaries, like those here.

Says a whack job like you?

Too funny....sorry my point is true.
 
Please, do tell how that backs up your assertion.

This is gonna be good
Do I have to draw you a picture? Two boys walking down the middle of the street. Cop pulls up tells them to get off street... they keep walking cop puts car in reverse turns his wheel to angle the car TOWARD THEM OVER THEM AND/OR BLOCK THEM CLOSE ENOUGH FOR THEM TO SHUT THE DOOR WHEN HE OPENS IT. Do I need to video tape a re-enactment for you? Do that to a cop and you will be arrested for ATTEMPTED VEHICULAR HOMICIDE.
Oh he tried blocking them in to stop them? Your really showing how desperate you are. You do realize that?
Yes or no if it was the cops walking in the street and a gangbanger did that with his SUV he's going to jail for attempted vehicular homicide.

So your point is that a call went out that two cops stole cigars from a Convenience Store and the Bangers are rolling up to investigate it?

Yes that's how stupid you sound.
Yes or no there's one set of rules for the cops and another set for everyone else.

Sorry, I don't do moral equivocation.

One cannot equivocate a Cop doing his job with bangers breaking the law.

It takes a VERY weak mind to try and make that connection.
 
Do I have to draw you a picture? Two boys walking down the middle of the street. Cop pulls up tells them to get off street... they keep walking cop puts car in reverse turns his wheel to angle the car TOWARD THEM OVER THEM AND/OR BLOCK THEM CLOSE ENOUGH FOR THEM TO SHUT THE DOOR WHEN HE OPENS IT. Do I need to video tape a re-enactment for you? Do that to a cop and you will be arrested for ATTEMPTED VEHICULAR HOMICIDE.
Oh he tried blocking them in to stop them? Your really showing how desperate you are. You do realize that?
Yes or no if it was the cops walking in the street and a gangbanger did that with his SUV he's going to jail for attempted vehicular homicide.

So your point is that a call went out that two cops stole cigars from a Convenience Store and the Bangers are rolling up to investigate it?

Yes that's how stupid you sound.
Yes or no there's one set of rules for the cops and another set for everyone else.

Sorry, I don't do moral equivocation.

One cannot equivocate a Cop doing his job with bangers breaking the law.

It takes a VERY weak mind to try and make that connection.
Takes a very weak mind not to see an assault is an assault and not dependent on what you personally do regarding moral equivocation.
 
Liberals (the insidious pieces of shit who actually know this was self defense), which are commies more than liberals, do not give one ounce of shit what the facts are in the case.

Just so long as they can push their narrative. As facts come out, they can make it so convoluted to the point where it does not matter. That is all deliberate. They are able to create the race division, and use there narrative to further destroy the "melting pot."

The democrats (socialists who we call liberals) are not interested in a melting pot. They need the divisions. In classes, in races, in genders. Where ever they can. Whatever opportunity to push their utopian myth and use all of their grievances for political gain. They are able to establish themselves as the fairy tale robin hoods by promulgating the notion that republicans are to blame for all of their miseries. It is essential that they have these separations and just as important to have the scapegoat.

Look at how well it works.

Fucking liberals suck, and I hate all of them.
So sorry to hear that you hate the Founders of this nation? Time to get the fuck out of my country little man.
Your kind calls the founders racist, homophobic, bigots. Your the traitor.
 

Forum List

Back
Top