sakinago
Gold Member
- Sep 13, 2012
- 5,320
- 1,632
- 280
Indict him for what exactly? Mueller report exonerated him from Russian collusion. You gonna go with obstruction of justice (for an alleged crime he has just been exonerated from)? The whole reason he fired coney was letting the charges of collusion fester. The charges came from a lone dossier that Comey and everyone else in the know, knew was bullshit. The mueller report could’ve recommended indictments, he exonerates trump of collusion and also states there’s nothing there to indict trump of obstruction. So that right there blows your whole theory of mueller can’t indict a sitting president, since the mueller report EXONERATED him.His excuse is a pretty valid reason for one to blacken some names out. There’s plenty of people on both right and left and they’re all saying the same thing about the report.You realize that it’s not at all a good sign for folks like you still clinging that the GOP wants this out in the public. It means they aren’t afraid of it. It also probably means it’s gonna make a lot of people look bad who aren’t trump...I wonder who those people would be?Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio Say Mueller Report 'Absolutely' Should Be Released To Public | HuffPost
The American people have a right to see this. Even Republicans agree
Great, they aren’t afraid.
Trump sais he is not afraid
....so what’s his pal Barr afraid of?
Jesus, what are y’all still not getting here? Mueller tried to warn you last week by saying there will be no new indictments. That’s quite a bold statement from a guy whose been quite.
According to DOJ guidelines Mueller CANT indict sitting president.