Court flips ACLU the finger

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Merlin1047, Dec 15, 2004.

  1. Merlin1047
    Offline

    Merlin1047 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2004
    Messages:
    3,500
    Thanks Received:
    449
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    AL
    Ratings:
    +450
    It's about time! Could it be that there is still some common sense hidden among the judiciary?
    ================================================
    http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=41469
    LAW OF THE LAND
    ACLU loses Christmas case
    City hall can have religious displays on front lawn

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Posted: November 16, 2004
    © 2004 WorldNetDaily.com


    The Constitution allows a Rhode Island city to have private religious holiday displays on its front lawn, a federal judge ruled yesterday in a suit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union.

    "The ACLU long ago decided it wanted to be Uncle Scrooge and expend its energies saying 'bah humbug' to public Christmas displays, but they are out of touch with the 96 percent of Americans that celebrate Christmas," said Gary McCaleb, senior counsel for the Arizona-based Alliance Defense Fund.

    McCaleb said the U.S. District Court for Rhode Island "ruled consistently with the law," noting that "time after time the courts have ruled such displays to be perfectly constitutional."


    The ACLU claimed the city of Cranston, R.I., erected religious displays along with secular displays in violation of the so-called "separation of church and state."

    But the court said the city can continue to open such forums to the public as long as it revises its policy to establish objective criteria for allowing the public to set up the holiday displays.

    In his opinion, Judge William Smith wrote that nothing in the city’s public statements or in its implementation of the policy for its Christmas displays "reveals or even remotely supports an inference that a religious purpose was behind the creation of the limited public forum," as the lawsuit alleged.

    The case centered on Cranston's 2003 opening of its city hall front lawn to private "seasonal and holiday displays," which resulted in various citizens making contributions, both religious and secular.

    The city clearly posted disclaimers stating, "The public displays are strictly from private citizens or groups. They in no way represent an official view of the City of Cranston, nor are they endorsed by the city."

    The Alliance Defense Fund has a "Christmas Project" featuring more than 700 trained attorneys "ready to combat continuing efforts to censor Christmas."
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. NATO AIR
    Offline

    NATO AIR Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2004
    Messages:
    4,275
    Thanks Received:
    282
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    USS Abraham Lincoln
    Ratings:
    +282
    I'm glad someone is defending Christmas... jeez, WTF has the ACLU become?
     
  3. no1tovote4
    Offline

    no1tovote4 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2004
    Messages:
    10,294
    Thanks Received:
    616
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Colorado
    Ratings:
    +616

    Wasn't the ACLU created by the Communist Party in order to further their goals through the Legal System?

    Yeah here it is:

    http://www.etherzone.com/2001/mors071301.shtml

    This is just one article with the same theme online.
     
  4. Avatar4321
    Offline

    Avatar4321 Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    70,537
    Thanks Received:
    8,161
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +12,153
    In Rhode Island huh? thats not even a conservative state. I bet you anything the ACLU is wondering what the heck just went wrong.
     

Share This Page