Could Trump actually beat Hillary in a debate?

[hadit]

You remind me of the rooster that crows in the morning when it sees the sun. The difference is that you believe the Rooster is responsible for the sunrise when everyone (including the rooster) knows differently.

Ignorance is bliss and you're orgasmic.

You don't make any sense, but I'm sure you've been told that many times.

Jilligan said that the Republican candidates makes their "electorate gag". I just showed how the electorate came out in record numbers to vote for their respective Republican candidate and I also showed how her beloved Democrat party appears to be the ones gagging their electorate.

When you were asked if you could be anymore stupid, you took it as a challenge and showed us that you could indeed be even more stupid.

There certainly is an enthusiasm gap right now between the Republicans and democrats, and that is huge in an election where turnout is key. Hillary is a terrible candidate, doesn't inspire, is unlikable and turns people off with her rhetorical screeching. Democrats are going to have to have something more to offer than "oh meh gerhd, they's gunna take away abertion!!".

well, I can tell you that women aren't going to vote for an anti-choice extremist who doesn't believe in equal pay for equal work. and that also means we can't vote for someone who will appoint judges who won't enforce our rights.

But you will vote for an extremist who on the one hand proclaims that women have the right to heard and believed when they say they were sexually assaulted while on the other denigrates women who did exactly that. "Nuts and sluts" won't just go away, you know.

if you have a problem with that, i'd suggest you get over it.

as for Hillary... the rightwingnuts have done nothing but make up insane things for years about her. luckily, most people don't care what rightwingnuts say about our candidates.

truth is you all suddenly love Bernie because you know 70% of the people in this country won't vote for a socialist.

which makes you think it doesn't matter what type of idiot you put up as your candidate.

it doesn't work that way.

Of course we'd love to see Bernie inherit the nomination after Hillary implodes, but the DNC won't let that happen. They have Crazy Uncle Joe waiting in the wings, ready to reluctantly accept the draft "for the good of the party".

How many of you silly goobers are there that actually believe that crap? I'm guessing at least a few dozen.

Keep watching as Bernie wins here and there but continues to slide in the delegate count.

 

[deltex1]

FoxNews.com - Breaking News | Latest News | Current News:

Trouble for Hillary....mo trubble

 

[Dragonlady]

FoxNews.com - Breaking News | Latest News | Current News:

Trouble for Hillary....mo trubble

Another instance of Fox News trying to make something out of nothing. And of course you jumped on it.

 

[BULLDOG]

You don't make any sense, but I'm sure you've been told that many times.

Jilligan said that the Republican candidates makes their "electorate gag". I just showed how the electorate came out in record numbers to vote for their respective Republican candidate and I also showed how her beloved Democrat party appears to be the ones gagging their electorate.

When you were asked if you could be anymore stupid, you took it as a challenge and showed us that you could indeed be even more stupid.

There certainly is an enthusiasm gap right now between the Republicans and democrats, and that is huge in an election where turnout is key. Hillary is a terrible candidate, doesn't inspire, is unlikable and turns people off with her rhetorical screeching. Democrats are going to have to have something more to offer than "oh meh gerhd, they's gunna take away abertion!!".

well, I can tell you that women aren't going to vote for an anti-choice extremist who doesn't believe in equal pay for equal work. and that also means we can't vote for someone who will appoint judges who won't enforce our rights.

But you will vote for an extremist who on the one hand proclaims that women have the right to heard and believed when they say they were sexually assaulted while on the other denigrates women who did exactly that. "Nuts and sluts" won't just go away, you know.

if you have a problem with that, i'd suggest you get over it.

as for Hillary... the rightwingnuts have done nothing but make up insane things for years about her. luckily, most people don't care what rightwingnuts say about our candidates.

truth is you all suddenly love Bernie because you know 70% of the people in this country won't vote for a socialist.

which makes you think it doesn't matter what type of idiot you put up as your candidate.

it doesn't work that way.

Of course we'd love to see Bernie inherit the nomination after Hillary implodes, but the DNC won't let that happen. They have Crazy Uncle Joe waiting in the wings, ready to reluctantly accept the draft "for the good of the party".

How many of you silly goobers are there that actually believe that crap? I'm guessing at least a few dozen.

Keep watching as Bernie wins here and there but continues to slide in the delegate count.

Bernie's standing has nothing to do with your ridiculous claim about Biden.

 

[Care4all]

FoxNews.com - Breaking News | Latest News | Current News:

Trouble for Hillary....mo trubble

Another instance of Fox News trying to make something out of nothing. And of course you jumped on it.

It's amazing how all these Conservatives have gone after Fox for being unreliable, unprofessional , liars, and a news station with an agenda to stop Trump from winning....

YET STILL use them as a news source against Democrats...and thinks we should believe Fox to be a reliable news source??

 

[hadit]

There certainly is an enthusiasm gap right now between the Republicans and democrats, and that is huge in an election where turnout is key. Hillary is a terrible candidate, doesn't inspire, is unlikable and turns people off with her rhetorical screeching. Democrats are going to have to have something more to offer than "oh meh gerhd, they's gunna take away abertion!!".

well, I can tell you that women aren't going to vote for an anti-choice extremist who doesn't believe in equal pay for equal work. and that also means we can't vote for someone who will appoint judges who won't enforce our rights.

But you will vote for an extremist who on the one hand proclaims that women have the right to heard and believed when they say they were sexually assaulted while on the other denigrates women who did exactly that. "Nuts and sluts" won't just go away, you know.

if you have a problem with that, i'd suggest you get over it.

as for Hillary... the rightwingnuts have done nothing but make up insane things for years about her. luckily, most people don't care what rightwingnuts say about our candidates.

truth is you all suddenly love Bernie because you know 70% of the people in this country won't vote for a socialist.

which makes you think it doesn't matter what type of idiot you put up as your candidate.

it doesn't work that way.

Of course we'd love to see Bernie inherit the nomination after Hillary implodes, but the DNC won't let that happen. They have Crazy Uncle Joe waiting in the wings, ready to reluctantly accept the draft "for the good of the party".

How many of you silly goobers are there that actually believe that crap? I'm guessing at least a few dozen.

Keep watching as Bernie wins here and there but continues to slide in the delegate count.

Bernie's standing has nothing to do with your ridiculous claim about Biden.

Meh, it would surprise me precisely zero if he were to do exactly what I said. If Hillary seriously implodes, do you for a second think the DNC is going to actually nominate Bernie? Seriously?

 

[BULLDOG]

well, I can tell you that women aren't going to vote for an anti-choice extremist who doesn't believe in equal pay for equal work. and that also means we can't vote for someone who will appoint judges who won't enforce our rights.

But you will vote for an extremist who on the one hand proclaims that women have the right to heard and believed when they say they were sexually assaulted while on the other denigrates women who did exactly that. "Nuts and sluts" won't just go away, you know.

if you have a problem with that, i'd suggest you get over it.

as for Hillary... the rightwingnuts have done nothing but make up insane things for years about her. luckily, most people don't care what rightwingnuts say about our candidates.

truth is you all suddenly love Bernie because you know 70% of the people in this country won't vote for a socialist.

which makes you think it doesn't matter what type of idiot you put up as your candidate.

it doesn't work that way.

Of course we'd love to see Bernie inherit the nomination after Hillary implodes, but the DNC won't let that happen. They have Crazy Uncle Joe waiting in the wings, ready to reluctantly accept the draft "for the good of the party".

How many of you silly goobers are there that actually believe that crap? I'm guessing at least a few dozen.

Keep watching as Bernie wins here and there but continues to slide in the delegate count.

Bernie's standing has nothing to do with your ridiculous claim about Biden.

Meh, it would surprise me precisely zero if he were to do exactly what I said. If Hillary seriously implodes, do you for a second think the DNC is going to actually nominate Bernie? Seriously?

Do you seriously think Hillary is going to be out of the running for any reason? I know you hope that, but sadly for you, your hopes don't count for anything.

 

[hadit]

But you will vote for an extremist who on the one hand proclaims that women have the right to heard and believed when they say they were sexually assaulted while on the other denigrates women who did exactly that. "Nuts and sluts" won't just go away, you know.

Of course we'd love to see Bernie inherit the nomination after Hillary implodes, but the DNC won't let that happen. They have Crazy Uncle Joe waiting in the wings, ready to reluctantly accept the draft "for the good of the party".

How many of you silly goobers are there that actually believe that crap? I'm guessing at least a few dozen.

Keep watching as Bernie wins here and there but continues to slide in the delegate count.

Bernie's standing has nothing to do with your ridiculous claim about Biden.

Meh, it would surprise me precisely zero if he were to do exactly what I said. If Hillary seriously implodes, do you for a second think the DNC is going to actually nominate Bernie? Seriously?

Do you seriously think Hillary is going to be out of the running for any reason? I know you hope that, but sadly for you, your hopes don't count for anything.

If she is, it will be of her own doing. She's a terrible candidate.

 

[BULLDOG]

How many of you silly goobers are there that actually believe that crap? I'm guessing at least a few dozen.

Keep watching as Bernie wins here and there but continues to slide in the delegate count.

Bernie's standing has nothing to do with your ridiculous claim about Biden.

Meh, it would surprise me precisely zero if he were to do exactly what I said. If Hillary seriously implodes, do you for a second think the DNC is going to actually nominate Bernie? Seriously?

Do you seriously think Hillary is going to be out of the running for any reason? I know you hope that, but sadly for you, your hopes don't count for anything.

If she is, it will be of her own doing. She's a terrible candidate.

No, she's not a terrible candidate, but if she were a terrible candidate, can you imagine how bad she would tromp the right wing if she were a good one?

 

[hadit]

Keep watching as Bernie wins here and there but continues to slide in the delegate count.

Bernie's standing has nothing to do with your ridiculous claim about Biden.

Meh, it would surprise me precisely zero if he were to do exactly what I said. If Hillary seriously implodes, do you for a second think the DNC is going to actually nominate Bernie? Seriously?

Do you seriously think Hillary is going to be out of the running for any reason? I know you hope that, but sadly for you, your hopes don't count for anything.

If she is, it will be of her own doing. She's a terrible candidate.

No, she's not a terrible candidate, but if she were a terrible candidate, can you imagine how bad she would tromp the right wing if she were a good one?

With her connections and ruthlessness, there should have been no way for an inexperienced community organizer to knock her off in '08, and an only recently socialist turned democrat should not even be registering in the polls against her now. She is the ultimate insider running in a time when the electorate is completely fed up with insider politics as usual. She's a terrible candidate at a terrible time.

 

[jillian]

Trump would lose and lose huge in a 1 on 1 presidential debate. You are going to need a Cruz or Paul to go toe to toe with Hillary and her tag team partner the leftist scum debate moderator.

cruz holds no appeal for anyone who isn't an evangelical. I actually would have been interesting in watching the debate between rand paul and Hillary Clinton.

but then rand turned into a whining little twit and got blown out by trump

 

[HenryBHough]

A debate?

You really think Mrs. Rodham-Clinton/Lewinsky might remember she was scheduled for a debate?

But her minders have that under control and their huge staff will keep her informed, sober and upright (physically) so, yeah, there maybe could might be a debate. Perhaps.

 

[easyt65]

1. Trump is a '2-Trick Pony' in debates: 1) Deflect & 2) Attack. He does 'Saul Alynski' better than Saul Alynski did 'Saul Alynski'.

2. Trump is NOT the GOP of the past. By that I mean in the past, when the Democrat candidate had skeletons in their closet the GOP 'took the high road', refused to 'get down in the mud' and fight, and said nothing - gave them a pass on their skeletons. Trump is not going to do that. He is going to bring EVERYTHING out:

- MORALS & ETHICS: 'Let Go' from the Watergate group for lack of ethics

- LIAR: Repeated examples

- IRAQ WAR: Argued FOR it and voted to give Bush the authorization to go to war

- WAR ON WOMEN: Demonizing, bullying, attacking, and attempting to silence her husband's victims

- INCOMPETENCE: 'Lost' $6 Billion in State Department Funds as SoS; Got 4 Americans NEEDLESSLY Murdered

- THREAT TO NATIONAL SECURITY: Jeopardized our National Security with her illegal private server, keeping thousands of classified documents for herself in violation of the Law that required her to turn over ALL classified (TS/SCI) when she left the State Department

- TERRORISM: SoS partially responsible for Al Qaeida taking over Libya....

- RACE: Called blacks 'Super Predators' in '96

As brash and 'rutheless' as Trump is, I think he will go for her 'jugular' unlike the GOP of old....

 

[HenryBHough]

Thank you for listing all the things that make Trump so attractive to Democrat Party leadership - he has all the characteristics they count as trophies. Now why aren't they proposing to nominate him?

 

[rcfieldz]

If Trump is elected I can't wait to see who falls in line to get an appointment to his cabinet.

 

[easyt65]

cruz holds no appeal for anyone who isn't an evangelical.

I don't know... Cruz is NOT Trump - a plus, not a narcissist like Trump - a plus, knows the Constitution and is probably the most Conservative - a plus, stands up for what he truly believes in unlike Rubio - a plus, never joined the 'Gang od 8' - a plus, never joined Democrats to support nor does he now support Amnesty like Rubio - a plus, and actually showed up for work / votes unlike Rubio - a plus.

Every candidate is going to have things you don't like about them. The trick is to find the one who most represents you and your beliefs. Rubio is out for me because he did not defend / fight for his own legislation - I want someone willing to FIGHT for what they believe in / me not someone who rolls over when faced with adversity / opposition AND because of his being set in stone about wanting Amnesty. Trump is a 'bitter pill' because he says 'nothing' ('I'm going to make America great'?!), he is a narcissistic bully, etc...

There are things I don't like about Cruz as well, but at least these 3 are not a Socialist or a corrupt, scandal-plagued criminal who was so incompetent that they got Americans needlessly killed and jeopardized our national security.

 

[jillian]

cruz holds no appeal for anyone who isn't an evangelical.

I don't know... Cruz is NOT Trump - a plus, not a narcissist like Trump - a plus, knows the Constitution and is probably the most Conservative - a plus, stands up for what he truly believes in unlike Rubio - a plus, never joined the 'Gang od 8' - a plus, never joined Democrats to support nor does he now support Amnesty like Rubio - a plus, and actually showed up for work / votes unlike Rubio - a plus.

Every candidate is going to have things you don't like about them. The trick is to find the one who most represents you and your beliefs. Rubio is out for me because he did not defend / fight for his own legislation - I want someone willing to FIGHT for what they believe in / me not someone who rolls over when faced with adversity / opposition AND because of his being set in stone about wanting Amnesty. Trump is a 'bitter pill' because he says 'nothing' ('I'm going to make America great'?!), he is a narcissistic bully, etc...

There are things I don't like about Cruz as well, but at least these 3 are not a Socialist or a corrupt, scandal-plagued criminal who was so incompetent that they got Americans needlessly killed and jeopardized our national security.

i';m just going by the polls. and you know other than evangelicals everyone pretty much hates him as far as I can see... and that's even among the people in his own party. his first college roommate tweets about him and tells everyone that they'd be better off picking a name from the telephone book to be president than having cruz as president. I'd say that's pretty definitive.

you all should have picked Kasich. until his comment about women leaving their kitchen to vote for him he had a really good chance of winning. he'd also have brought ohio and no republican has ever won without that state.

and no one who would ever vote for a democrat cares about the Benghazi nonsense. most people think that she's been abused by the right for political gain. bush had 13 benghazis and 50 dead the difference is the dems didn't politicize it.

 

[Siete]

sooner or later Trump will have to debate the issues and let go of the school yard bickering.

It's damned if he does, damned if he doesn't, anyone can, and will win a debate with him.

 

[jillian]

sooner or later Trump will have to debate the issues and let go of the school yard bickering.

It's damned if he does, damned if he doesn't, anyone can, and will win a debate with him.

he also can't do to a woman what he does to a man. and he can't refuse to debate Hillary like he refused to answer Meagan Kelly.

but truth, but the time they debate, most people are going to be pretty well firm in their opinions of both the Donald and Hillary.

 

[g5000]

sooner or later Trump will have to debate the issues and let go of the school yard bickering.

It's damned if he does, damned if he doesn't, anyone can, and will win a debate with him.

he also can't do to a woman what he does to a man

Yes he can. Trump will schlong Clinton in a debate.