Could Trump actually beat Hillary in a debate?

Clinton has perfected the deflection of a question that, if truth would be told, had a negative answer. She is a pro at debates, there is no doubt. She can turn any negative question into platitudes for herself.

At the same time, Trump would be a complete disaster in a debate. He doesn't have the vocabulary, instincts, or filter to stay away from appearing to look like what he is, an ego gone wrong.

The perfect person to debate her would have been Newt Gingrich. He could take any question, frame it properly as a history lesson and give superb answers. He would have gone after Clinton and come out on top.
I guess you have never sat at a negotiating table with Trump right?
Those that have will tell you Trump is always 100% prepared. He knows EVERYTHING down to the last fucking piece of wallboard costs.
President Trump will surround himself with the best experts on the planet who will give him honest detailed information. Then Trump will negotiate.
The LAST thing anyone would EVER do if they worked for Trump is give him information based on what they thought he wanted to hear. Not like in Obama's case. He surrounded himself with fucking idiot 'yes-women' and look what that bullshit has led to.
The fact is Trump will end up debating 'Lonesome Joe' who will be dragged on stage.
His entire political life can be defined as one endless 'Talking Point'.
That's very nice to hear. I hope he does that well, if he indeed turns out to be the nominee. But, can he stop with the self promoting accolades long enough to get into detail? Can he stop focusing on himself rather than the goal he has set for himself? I think he has improved and brought down the banter of irrelevant details, but not yet does he have the impression if being presidential.

His last words at the last debate if I'm not in error were "we're going to win win win win A real blowhard
You would prefer a candidate who would say: "We are maybe going to win"?
That's what's gone wrong with America thanks to pansy-assed LIB pajama-boy fucking LIB cowards.
They could see one of their own in Obama. 'Vaguely gay, 'lead from behind' Socialist.

Don't you get it ?? He's got nothing but insults Let him pull that crap on world leaders and see how far we go
I believe he has had more ideas than insults...
 
Trump would lose and lose huge in a 1 on 1 presidential debate. You are going to need a Cruz or Paul to go toe to toe with Hillary and her tag team partner the leftist scum debate moderator.

Paul is out.

I agree that Cruz could mop the floor with Hillary. Hillary assumes she's smarter than everyone else, but remember that Obama with a third her IQ beat her, and Ted Cruz is smarter than she is.
 
"she said she followed trump's tabloid life on tv, and last year, when she heard him speak about politics, she registered to vote for the 1st time. She was not persuaded by arguments that trump has been disrespectful to women and would have trouble running against hillary rodham clinton. "I am a woman. i wouldn't vote for hillary rodham clinton if she was the last person on the face of the earth. she is a disgrace to womankind.""
 
Trump would lose and lose huge in a 1 on 1 presidential debate. You are going to need a Cruz or Paul to go toe to toe with Hillary and her tag team partner the leftist scum debate moderator.

Paul is out.

I agree that Cruz could mop the floor with Hillary. Hillary assumes she's smarter than everyone else, but remember that Obama with a third her IQ beat her, and Ted Cruz is smarter than she is.

I'll tell you who would be a complete disaster in a debate with Hillary, Jeb Bush. He stutters and fumbles and has about 15 quirks and ticks and that's on stage with a bunch of candidates. The pressure is WAY higher in a one on one presidential debate.
 
All he ever offers are platitudes with no substance. While I don't agree with Hillary on anything I don't think Trump could best her on substance. She would constantly be able to use one phrase that would keep Trump perpetually in defense mode, "Remember when you said......*insert liberal positions here*"

Most of his supporters don't care about substance. His name calling and insults are just fine with them. The GOP will never be the same!
 
hiLIARy will be left crying in the fetal position when Trump is done eviscerating her. She's a horrid debater. She can't play the victim with Trump, he's going to go for her turkey neck, and bleed her like the pig she is.....
 
hiLIARy will be left crying in the fetal position when Trump is done eviscerating her. She's a horrid debater. She can't play the victim with Trump, he's going to go for her turkey neck, and bleed her like the pig she is.....

Fetal position like the one you regressed into after November 2012...:badgrin:
 
The turkey necked Cankled Cuckquean will be shredded like a head of Mexican lettuce. She might break down right on stage after Donald asks her about Bill's illegitimate black son. It will be fun to watch. Unless you're stupid enough to support that witch.
 
You remind me of the rooster that crows in the morning when it sees the sun. The difference is that you believe the Rooster is responsible for the sunrise when everyone (including the rooster) knows differently.

Ignorance is bliss and you're orgasmic.

You don't make any sense, but I'm sure you've been told that many times.

Jilligan said that the Republican candidates makes their "electorate gag". I just showed how the electorate came out in record numbers to vote for their respective Republican candidate and I also showed how her beloved Democrat party appears to be the ones gagging their electorate.

When you were asked if you could be anymore stupid, you took it as a challenge and showed us that you could indeed be even more stupid.
There certainly is an enthusiasm gap right now between the Republicans and democrats, and that is huge in an election where turnout is key. Hillary is a terrible candidate, doesn't inspire, is unlikable and turns people off with her rhetorical screeching. Democrats are going to have to have something more to offer than "oh meh gerhd, they's gunna take away abertion!!".

well, I can tell you that women aren't going to vote for an anti-choice extremist who doesn't believe in equal pay for equal work. and that also means we can't vote for someone who will appoint judges who won't enforce our rights.

if you have a problem with that, i'd suggest you get over it.

as for Hillary... the rightwingnuts have done nothing but make up insane things for years about her. luckily, most people don't care what rightwingnuts say about our candidates.

truth is you all suddenly love Bernie because you know 70% of the people in this country won't vote for a socialist.

which makes you think it doesn't matter what type of idiot you put up as your candidate.

it doesn't work that way.

You are not pro-choice, you are pro-abortion. Stop with the bullshit.
Lonestar "logic"...oxymoron.

Being pro choice means a woman has the right to reproductive choice. I know that is threatening to the GOP...letting the women folk do what they want to.

Tough.

Reproductive choice can also refer to a woman wanting to control the population.....something, Margaret Sanger, a woman, wanted to do..
 
hiLIARy: Bill and I, we support the children. We always have. We are big supporters of the children. Especially the children!! We love the children!!

Trump: What about Danney Lee Williams Jr. ? Did you and your pig husband support him?

hiLIARy: I ah, uh, um, err, I ....cough, cough. .(breaks down in a coughing fit and is carried off in a stretcher).

Trump: That (points at the pathetic hiLIARy now being hauled off in an reinforced stretcher) is why you can't vote for her.

Audience: :clap::clap2::clap::clap2::clap::clap2::clap::clap2:
 
All he ever offers are platitudes with no substance. While I don't agree with Hillary on anything I don't think Trump could best her on substance. She would constantly be able to use one phrase that would keep Trump perpetually in defense mode, "Remember when you said......*insert liberal positions here*"

I hate to point out the obvious here (because I'm really not a big Trump supporter) but the rest of the GOP field have been trying to put Trump in "defense mode" through a number of debates and he hasn't blinked. What makes you think Hillary is any better suited to do what they couldn't do? How she's fended off Bernie Sander's attacks? Oh, that's right...Bernie has refused to attack her on things like Benghazi or the e-mail scandals! Do any of you think Trump is going to hold back any punches in attacking Clinton? The question I would have in a Clinton - Trump debate is whether anyone is going to want to vote for either of them by the end of one?
 
The places Donald WILL go:

E-mail Scandal
Clinton Foundation slush fund
Bill's history of being a dangerous sexual predator
Her being an enabler of a dangerous sexual predator
Benghazi - specifically how she lied to the families - saying it was a YouTube video
Bubba's half black bastard son
Her brain damage and the prism glasses
Her coughing fits and bad health
Monica Lewinsky
Asia fund raising scandal
Whitewater
Her speaking fees
Transcripts of her speeches to Goldman Sachs
Cattle Futures

She's a treasure trove! She has more scandals than you can count.

:popcorn:
 
All he ever offers are platitudes with no substance. While I don't agree with Hillary on anything I don't think Trump could best her on substance. She would constantly be able to use one phrase that would keep Trump perpetually in defense mode, "Remember when you said......*insert liberal positions here*"
Hillary will say "America is great now...it's always been great...what we need to do now is heal...come together as one people". The electorate will melt..the seas will recede, free shit will flow from on high. Trump will be toast.....yo.
 

Forum List

Back
Top