Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Or you COULD look at it this way - Don't do things that would provoke a police officer(s) to HAVE to take you to the ground. Problem solved.Cops Held Mentally Ill Man Down on Scorching Asphalt Until His Skin Literally Melted Off
(FTP) — A California man is suing the city of Citrus Heights and several of its police officers for the horrific injuries — skin literally melting off — when police forced him onto the ground of a restaurant parking lot when the temperature was more than 100 degrees outside. The city finally settled this lawsuit, but it was just learned that police and officials forced the victim’s attorney and the victim to stay silent about it. Luckily, the press is not subject to the same terms.
Well you got your ggood guys and you got your bad guys but then you have these looons who think they won't get punished because they are on the
That seems a fairly silly response, because there is NOTHING at all a person could possibly do that would warrent them being forced on to the ground.
If they committed a crime, you hand cuff and arrest them.
At no time is it better, easier, appropriate, or legal, to knock them to the ground.
Resisting arrest?
So what if someone is resisting arrest?
That does not mean you have any reason to knock them down on hard, hot, asphalt.
Why not just shoot them all instead of arresting anyone then?
If you allow punishment before trial, then why bother with a trial at all?
The fake news stipulated that the victim's skin "literally melted off". How is that possible?
Go to Az. once DUFIS!
As a kid going barefoot, I got blisters just walking asphalt in WI during the summer.
So you were a dumbass as a kid also? Nothing has changed apparently!
No. Blistering is not melting. Blistering is characteristic of a second degree burn, and that is not "melting". A third degree burn cause destruction of the skin tissue.
Don't be a dumbass and agree with some off the wall source that is spewing lies to make the cops look badly.
The fake news stipulated that the victim's skin "literally melted off". How is that possible?
Go to Az. once DUFIS!
As a kid going barefoot, I got blisters just walking asphalt in WI during the summer.
So you were a dumbass as a kid also? Nothing has changed apparently!
Seems to me all kids learn by making mistakes.
But I learn from my mistakes.
Or you COULD look at it this way - Don't do things that would provoke a police officer(s) to HAVE to take you to the ground. Problem solved.Cops Held Mentally Ill Man Down on Scorching Asphalt Until His Skin Literally Melted Off
(FTP) — A California man is suing the city of Citrus Heights and several of its police officers for the horrific injuries — skin literally melting off — when police forced him onto the ground of a restaurant parking lot when the temperature was more than 100 degrees outside. The city finally settled this lawsuit, but it was just learned that police and officials forced the victim’s attorney and the victim to stay silent about it. Luckily, the press is not subject to the same terms.
Well you got your ggood guys and you got your bad guys but then you have these looons who think they won't get punished because they are on the
That seems a fairly silly response, because there is NOTHING at all a person could possibly do that would warrent them being forced on to the ground.
If they committed a crime, you hand cuff and arrest them.
At no time is it better, easier, appropriate, or legal, to knock them to the ground.
Resisting arrest?
So what if someone is resisting arrest?
That does not mean you have any reason to knock them down on hard, hot, asphalt.
Why not just shoot them all instead of arresting anyone then?
If you allow punishment before trial, then why bother with a trial at all?
To prevent someone from resisting arrest and/or hurting themselves, you place them in a position to limit their movement. The story is an exaggeration at the least and an outright lie at the worst.
The fake news stipulated that the victim's skin "literally melted off". How is that possible?
Go to Az. once DUFIS!
As a kid going barefoot, I got blisters just walking asphalt in WI during the summer.
So you were a dumbass as a kid also? Nothing has changed apparently!
Seems to me all kids learn by making mistakes.
But I learn from my mistakes.
I thought by your post that you were providing justification for why you are a dumbass today. If it is not that, why are you a dumbass?
Or you COULD look at it this way - Don't do things that would provoke a police officer(s) to HAVE to take you to the ground. Problem solved.
That seems a fairly silly response, because there is NOTHING at all a person could possibly do that would warrent them being forced on to the ground.
If they committed a crime, you hand cuff and arrest them.
At no time is it better, easier, appropriate, or legal, to knock them to the ground.
Resisting arrest?
So what if someone is resisting arrest?
That does not mean you have any reason to knock them down on hard, hot, asphalt.
Why not just shoot them all instead of arresting anyone then?
If you allow punishment before trial, then why bother with a trial at all?
To prevent someone from resisting arrest and/or hurting themselves, you place them in a position to limit their movement. The story is an exaggeration at the least and an outright lie at the worst.
Sure, and the position you place them in is on a padded seat in the back of a police car.
If instead you knock them to the ground, you not only risk injuring them, but you have angered them and allowed them to use their feet at much more dangerous weapons than their hands would be.
The contention on this thread is whether or not hot asphalt can cause burns.
The point of the post was to prove hot asphalt does cause burns.
It pretty much has to, and everyone should know that by the time they become adults.
Go to Az. once DUFIS!
As a kid going barefoot, I got blisters just walking asphalt in WI during the summer.
So you were a dumbass as a kid also? Nothing has changed apparently!
Seems to me all kids learn by making mistakes.
But I learn from my mistakes.
I thought by your post that you were providing justification for why you are a dumbass today. If it is not that, why are you a dumbass?
The contention on this thread is whether or not hot asphalt can cause burns.
The point of the post was to prove hot asphalt does cause burns.
It pretty much has to, and everyone should know that by the time they become adults.
That seems a fairly silly response, because there is NOTHING at all a person could possibly do that would warrent them being forced on to the ground.
If they committed a crime, you hand cuff and arrest them.
At no time is it better, easier, appropriate, or legal, to knock them to the ground.
Resisting arrest?
So what if someone is resisting arrest?
That does not mean you have any reason to knock them down on hard, hot, asphalt.
Why not just shoot them all instead of arresting anyone then?
If you allow punishment before trial, then why bother with a trial at all?
To prevent someone from resisting arrest and/or hurting themselves, you place them in a position to limit their movement. The story is an exaggeration at the least and an outright lie at the worst.
Sure, and the position you place them in is on a padded seat in the back of a police car.
If instead you knock them to the ground, you not only risk injuring them, but you have angered them and allowed them to use their feet at much more dangerous weapons than their hands would be.
You don't know jack about what is proper, dumbass! Were you there?
What is the first thing a cop does before arresting someone in a violent situation? He puts them of the ground!
As a kid going barefoot, I got blisters just walking asphalt in WI during the summer.
So you were a dumbass as a kid also? Nothing has changed apparently!
Seems to me all kids learn by making mistakes.
But I learn from my mistakes.
I thought by your post that you were providing justification for why you are a dumbass today. If it is not that, why are you a dumbass?
The contention on this thread is whether or not hot asphalt can cause burns.
The point of the post was to prove hot asphalt does cause burns.
It pretty much has to, and everyone should know that by the time they become adults.
Yes, hot asphalt can cause burns, but not as you, the person suing the cops, or the article claims.
If what you said was true, there would thousands of sailors walking around with disfigured faces, necks and hands caused by the heat in shipboard engineering spaces.
Resisting arrest?
So what if someone is resisting arrest?
That does not mean you have any reason to knock them down on hard, hot, asphalt.
Why not just shoot them all instead of arresting anyone then?
If you allow punishment before trial, then why bother with a trial at all?
To prevent someone from resisting arrest and/or hurting themselves, you place them in a position to limit their movement. The story is an exaggeration at the least and an outright lie at the worst.
Sure, and the position you place them in is on a padded seat in the back of a police car.
If instead you knock them to the ground, you not only risk injuring them, but you have angered them and allowed them to use their feet at much more dangerous weapons than their hands would be.
You don't know jack about what is proper, dumbass! Were you there?
What is the first thing a cop does before arresting someone in a violent situation? He puts them of the ground!
I am old enough to have seen hundreds of violent confrontations with police, and only in the last decade are police so stupid and badly trained as to put people on the ground. It is asking for trouble. It is also illegal.
In our legalistic society today, you have to ask; did the police follow their training or not, not whether in your subjective opinion hot tar is an appropriate surface to hold someone down on.Well you got your ggood guys and you got your bad guys but then you have these looons who think they won't get punished because they are on the
It was stipulated that the guy was crazy. It is always appropriate to restrain both crazy people and sane dangerous people on the ground in order to protect the arresting officers until they can be transported safely. Who ya gonna call when that crazy guy come knocking on your door? .Or you COULD look at it this way - Don't do things that would provoke a police officer(s) to HAVE to take you to the ground. Problem solved.Cops Held Mentally Ill Man Down on Scorching Asphalt Until His Skin Literally Melted Off
(FTP) — A California man is suing the city of Citrus Heights and several of its police officers for the horrific injuries — skin literally melting off — when police forced him onto the ground of a restaurant parking lot when the temperature was more than 100 degrees outside. The city finally settled this lawsuit, but it was just learned that police and officials forced the victim’s attorney and the victim to stay silent about it. Luckily, the press is not subject to the same terms.
Well you got your ggood guys and you got your bad guys but then you have these looons who think they won't get punished because they are on the
That seems a fairly silly response, because there is NOTHING at all a person could possibly do that would warrent them being forced on to the ground.
If they committed a crime, you hand cuff and arrest them.
At no time is it better, easier, appropriate, or legal, to knock them to the ground.
as I stated--these articles leave a lot of facts outCops Held Mentally Ill Man Down on Scorching Asphalt Until His Skin Literally Melted Off
(FTP) — A California man is suing the city of Citrus Heights and several of its police officers for the horrific injuries — skin literally melting off — when police forced him onto the ground of a restaurant parking lot when the temperature was more than 100 degrees outside. The city finally settled this lawsuit, but it was just learned that police and officials forced the victim’s attorney and the victim to stay silent about it. Luckily, the press is not subject to the same terms.
Well you got your ggood guys and you got your bad guys but then you have these looons who think they won't get punished because they are on the
Another stupid pig that FNCCEO will no doubt defend that ought to be busted off the force, have the book thrown at and be charged with criminal assault.
SURE, you dumb, fucking jackass! Just lay here burning your skin off until I complete my arrest!
he got what he deservedSecurity footage inside the KFC shows that Nelson tried to jump the counter and took a swipe at the manager — he also unsuccessfully attempted to steal the manager’s wallet.
hahahhahahahahhResisting arrest?
So what if someone is resisting arrest?
That does not mean you have any reason to knock them down on hard, hot, asphalt.
Why not just shoot them all instead of arresting anyone then?
If you allow punishment before trial, then why bother with a trial at all?
To prevent someone from resisting arrest and/or hurting themselves, you place them in a position to limit their movement. The story is an exaggeration at the least and an outright lie at the worst.
Sure, and the position you place them in is on a padded seat in the back of a police car.
If instead you knock them to the ground, you not only risk injuring them, but you have angered them and allowed them to use their feet at much more dangerous weapons than their hands would be.
You don't know jack about what is proper, dumbass! Were you there?
What is the first thing a cop does before arresting someone in a violent situation? He puts them of the ground!
I am old enough to have seen hundreds of violent confrontations with police, and only in the last decade are police so stupid and badly trained as to put people on the ground. It is asking for trouble. It is also illegal.
another HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAOr you COULD look at it this way - Don't do things that would provoke a police officer(s) to HAVE to take you to the ground. Problem solved.
That seems a fairly silly response, because there is NOTHING at all a person could possibly do that would warrent them being forced on to the ground.
If they committed a crime, you hand cuff and arrest them.
At no time is it better, easier, appropriate, or legal, to knock them to the ground.
Resisting arrest?
So what if someone is resisting arrest?
That does not mean you have any reason to knock them down on hard, hot, asphalt.
Why not just shoot them all instead of arresting anyone then?
If you allow punishment before trial, then why bother with a trial at all?
To prevent someone from resisting arrest and/or hurting themselves, you place them in a position to limit their movement. The story is an exaggeration at the least and an outright lie at the worst.
Sure, and the position you place them in is on a padded seat in the back of a police car.
If instead you knock them to the ground, you not only risk injuring them, but you have angered them and allowed them to use their feet at much more dangerous weapons than their hands would be.
exactlyBecause what you seem to be implying, that police legally can impose a penalty through deliberately inflicting pain, without trial.
Sometimes saying 'pretty please' doesn't actually do the job.
