cops force pepper spray down the throats of UC davis students

then why did the Bush five year study find no type of fraud that the ID laws would stop?
 
pepper spray may be used when a police officer “reasonably believes” that it is necessary to:
1) protect himself, or another from unlawful use of force (e.g., assault);
2) effect an arrest, or establish physical control of a subject resisting arrest;
3) establish physical control of a subject attempting to flee from arrest or custody;
4) establish physical control of an emotionally disturbed person (edp); and
5) control a dangerous animal by deterring an attack, to prevent injury to persons or animals present.

pepper spray: Proper police tactic or excessive force?

the action by the davis campus police don't seem to fit that criteria...

Who is being unlawful here?

#2

Did you watch the video? There was no resisting going on. Fail.
 
You people should be ashamed of the republican party.

Instead you defend their stealing of elections.

Your party better change or its curtains for the republican party.

You have taken a once pround party and turned it into the party of lies and cheating.

Lincoln would spit on you
 
I have posted it many many times.

It is irrefutable evidence and even undenied by the republican party.

You just dont care about facts
 
In an opinion issued on Tuesday, Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise of Federal District Court ruled that the Republicans failed to show that conditions had changed enough to justify changing the agreement.

“It does not appear that the R.N.C.’s incentive to suppress minority votes has changed since 1982,” Judge Debevoise wrote, citing statistics showing that most minority voters support Democrats. “It appears that the R.N.C. has been largely unsuccessful in its efforts to attract minority voters. Until it is able to do so, it will have an incentive to engage in the type of voter suppression that it allegedly committed in the actions that led to the enactment and modification of the consent decree.”


http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/03/u...l=1&adxnnlx=1321798954-BoO07Csw+JFxPXlQ9ObYwA


court documented proof
 
The pepper spray on those kids sitting/kneeling was indisputably excessive force. For ages police have been able to physically remove people who were engaged in sit-ins without needing to physically harm the people. This scenario was no different.
 
In an opinion issued on Tuesday, Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise of Federal District Court ruled that the Republicans failed to show that conditions had changed enough to justify changing the agreement.

“It does not appear that the R.N.C.’s incentive to suppress minority votes has changed since 1982,” Judge Debevoise wrote, citing statistics showing that most minority voters support Democrats. “It appears that the R.N.C. has been largely unsuccessful in its efforts to attract minority voters. Until it is able to do so, it will have an incentive to engage in the type of voter suppression that it allegedly committed in the actions that led to the enactment and modification of the consent decree.”


U.S. Judge Opposes Republicans on Election Tactics - NYTimes.com


court documented proof

I dont mind pointing out you are stupid.


In an opinion issued on Tuesday, Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise of Federal District Court ruled that the Republicans failed to show that conditions had changed enough to justify changing the agreement.
 
Florida Central Voter File - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


CONGRESSIONAL testimony from a life long republican voter.





James Lee's testimony

On 17 April, 2001, James Lee testified, before the McKinney panel, that the state had given DBT the directive to add to the purge list people who matched at least 90% of a last name. DBT objected, knowing that this would produce a huge number of false positives (non-felons).[7]

Lee went on saying that the state then ordered DBT to shift to an even lower threshold of 80% match, allowing also names to be reversed (thus a person named Thomas Clarence could be taken to be the same as Clarence Thomas). Besides this, middle initials were skipped, Jr. and Sr. suffixes dropped, and some nicknames and aliases were added to puff up the list.

"DBT told state officials", testified Lee, "that the rules for creating the [purge] list would mean a significant number of people who were not deceased, not registered in more than one county, or not a felon, would be included on the list. DBT made suggestions to reduce the numbers of eligible voters included on the list". According to Lee, to this suggestion the state told the company, "Forget about it".

"The people who worked on this (for DBT) are very adamant... they told them what would happen", said Lee. "The state expected the county supervisors to be the failsafe." Lee said his company will never again get involved in cleansing voting rolls. "We are not confident any of the methods used today can guarantee legal voters will not be wrongfully denied the right to vote", Lee told a group of Atlanta-area black lawmakers in March 2001.[8]
 
Last edited:
Your party cheats in elections.


You defend their cheating.


Lincoln would spit on you
 
how long do the pigs think people will sit back and take it? Once a few cops are shot at and treated how they treat protestors then the real revolution will occur


The sprayed them...They did not force pepper spray down anyone's throats. Get a grip on reality.
 

Forum List

Back
Top