bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,328
- 2,180
Certain people are unable to adequately care for themselves or make competent decisions who may or may not be violent. Someone who is incompetent should be cared for in an institution. Bripat does not understand the Constitution or its role as a charter in crafting law.
I now understand why bripat does not want involuntary admission to mental institutions.
If they don't want to be in an institution, then what right does anyone have to force them into one?
Apparently you don't understand the concept called "freedom." That's where we make our own decisions rather than having some boot licking bureaucrat make them for us. The later concept is called "fascism."
There is nothing in the Constitution that gives government the authority to put anyone in an institution without a trial. So far you have utterly failed to provide any evidence of such. You haven't even tried.