Congress Moves To Ban Child Sex Dolls

Of course it is Bi-Partisan, I have commented many times that paedophilia and child abuse transcend political persuasion and also religious persuasion and that there are paedophiles and child abusers in all types of professions politicians, lawyers, judges, social workers, teachers, doctors, nurses, street cleaners and also the unemployed.

I was with my post there illustrating to Radical Right that there also are Leftists who are paedophiles and child abusers because he or she seems to be thinking with their post that ONLY those on the Right are involved in this sordid business.

We can each come up with a list of pedeophiles, or accused pedeophiles. My question is why you didn't call for the death penalty when Dennis Hastert was proven to have molested dozens of young boys, and then paid hush money to keep them quiet.

I had never heard of Dennis Hastert until I joined this forum.

My question stands do you think ONLY those on the Right are paedophiles or do you agree that there are Leftists who are also paedophiles, you chose only to name peoples on the Right, illustrating you are Partisan on this NON-Partisan situation.
 
Of course it is Bi-Partisan, I have commented many times that paedophilia and child abuse transcend political persuasion and also religious persuasion and that there are paedophiles and child abusers in all types of professions politicians, lawyers, judges, social workers, teachers, doctors, nurses, street cleaners and also the unemployed.

I was with my post there illustrating to Radical Right that there also are Leftists who are paedophiles and child abusers because he or she seems to be thinking with their post that ONLY those on the Right are involved in this sordid business.

We can each come up with a list of pedeophiles, or accused pedeophiles. My question is why you didn't call for the death penalty when Dennis Hastert was proven to have molested dozens of young boys, and then paid hush money to keep them quiet.

And you Partisan Hack you when this Dennis Hastert was first mentioned to me at this forum this is what I responded, which is basically the same I have commented in this thread we are now all posting in, I am very consistent with my opinions on the subject of paedophiles and child abusers and unlike you I am NOT a Partisan Hack who wants to blame one side as a means of protecting their OWN side which is what you are doing.

UOj4jWucS0_mjXt5rwxKGQ.png

_sFgLK2YT5isU0dIVJlBEQ.png


Boy Scouts Of America Love Trump
 
I had never heard of Dennis Hastert until I joined this forum.

My question stands do you think ONLY those on the Right are paedophiles or do you agree that there are Leftists who are also paedophiles, you chose only to name peoples on the Right, illustrating you are Partisan on this NON-Partisan situation.

Dennis Hastert - Wikipedia

Dennis Hastert
John Dennis Hastert ( born January 2, 1942) is a former American congressman who served as the 51st Speaker of the United States House of Representatives from 1999 to 2007. He is the longest-serving Republican Speaker of the House in history, and is the highest-ranking politician in U.S. history to have gone to prison

In May 2015, Hastert was indicted on federal charges of structuring bank withdrawals to evade bank reporting requirements and making false statements to federal investigators. Federal prosecutors said that the money was to compensate for and conceal deliberately unspecified misconduct by Hastert against an unnamed individual years earlier. Soon afterward, public accusations emerged that Hastert had sexually abused three male students (including the aforementioned unnamed individual) when he was a teacher more than three decades earlier

federal prosecutors made allegations of sexual misconduct against Hastert, saying that he had molested at least four boys as young as 14 while he worked as a high school wrestling coach decades earlier. At the sentencing hearing later that month, Hastert admitted that he had sexually abused boys whom he coached. The judge in the case referred to Hastert as a "serial child molester" and imposed a sentence of fifteen months in prison, two years' supervised release, and a $250,000 fine
 
I had never heard of Dennis Hastert until I joined this forum.

My question stands do you think ONLY those on the Right are paedophiles or do you agree that there are Leftists who are also paedophiles, you chose only to name peoples on the Right, illustrating you are Partisan on this NON-Partisan situation.

Dennis Hastert - Wikipedia

Dennis Hastert
John Dennis Hastert ( born January 2, 1942) is a former American congressman who served as the 51st Speaker of the United States House of Representatives from 1999 to 2007. He is the longest-serving Republican Speaker of the House in history, and is the highest-ranking politician in U.S. history to have gone to prison

In May 2015, Hastert was indicted on federal charges of structuring bank withdrawals to evade bank reporting requirements and making false statements to federal investigators. Federal prosecutors said that the money was to compensate for and conceal deliberately unspecified misconduct by Hastert against an unnamed individual years earlier. Soon afterward, public accusations emerged that Hastert had sexually abused three male students (including the aforementioned unnamed individual) when he was a teacher more than three decades earlier

federal prosecutors made allegations of sexual misconduct against Hastert, saying that he had molested at least four boys as young as 14 while he worked as a high school wrestling coach decades earlier. At the sentencing hearing later that month, Hastert admitted that he had sexually abused boys whom he coached. The judge in the case referred to Hastert as a "serial child molester" and imposed a sentence of fifteen months in prison, two years' supervised release, and a $250,000 fine

Yes we have already done this and see my post # 103

So enough of your bizarro obsession with Dennis Hastert and instead answer the question I ask now for a THIRD time:

Do you think ONLY those on the Right are paedophiles or do you agree that there are Leftists who are also paedophiles, you chose only to name peoples on the Right, illustrating you are Partisan on this NON-Partisan situation.
 
\
Do you think ONLY those on the Right are paedophiles or do you agree that there are Leftists who are also paedophiles, you chose only to name peoples on the Right, illustrating you are Partisan on this NON-Partisan situation.


There are pedeophiles at all levels and of all political leanings. But Hastert was the longest serving speaker of the house, and third in line for the presidency. He's not just some mayoral aide. He's a big fish, so why no calling for his head from you?
 
\
Do you think ONLY those on the Right are paedophiles or do you agree that there are Leftists who are also paedophiles, you chose only to name peoples on the Right, illustrating you are Partisan on this NON-Partisan situation.


There are pedeophiles at all levels and of all political leanings. But Hastert was the longest serving speaker of the house, and third in line for the presidency. He's not just some mayoral aide. He's a big fish, so why no calling for his head from you?

I have already responded to this is my post # 103
 
I have already responded to this is my post # 103

No mention of putting pedophiles to death, when it was Hastert.


IMHO there is no reason why roaming Death Squads shouldn't be on the streets rounding up and shooting paedophiles, many paedophiles are already on Sex Offenders Registers, so it would be very easy for roaming Death Squads to get the wastes of human skin.

Why no call to hunt down Dennis Hastert?

Why are you protecting him?
 
As Justice Anthony Kennedy said, would you ban somebody writing an explicit version of romeo and Juliette?

It's CHILD porn....are you actually defending it?

Now Romeo and Juliette is child porn? The law needs to protect children, but it has resulted in children being convicted of creating and distributing child porn by taking a naked selfie. What can we do to protect children imitating adults.

Virtual child porn. I could not care less about Romeo and Juliet.

Dear SassyIrishLass
1. I thought what made real child porn so dangerous was that the production of the images films or video involved abusing children in real life to create that material in the first place. Similar to snuff videos that involve killing or torturing animals which violates animal cruelty laws.

We would have to be careful how laws are written.

Example: If you get "too vague" or "overly broad" with "what IS virtual child porn"
then what if someone makes a cartoon of Romeo and Juliet with Juliet being 14 and Romeo being 18,
doesn't he count as an adult committing statutory rape if Juliet is more than 1-2 years within his age?

Technical issues like that can mean the difference between someone
getting labeled for LIFE as a sex offender.

2. Again my point is to go after the ADDICTION the DEMAND that is sick and dangerous.
Otherwise, you get into the business of banning alcohol because of the DANGER
of addiction, drunk driving, etc. Are you going to protect people from dangerous addicts
by BANNING alcohol or certain levels or concentrations of it?

Why not make it illegal to provide alcohol, marijuana or other drugs
to people with dangerous levels of addictions. Make a separate
"health and safety" ordinance similar to OSHA, where abuse or addictions
can be reported for counseling or corrections "as a threat to public health or safety"
and not "criminalize" the process of diagnosing and treating DISEASES
such as mental addictions that can be detected and monitored medically
similar to diabetes or cancer that develop in stages from curable to terminal and deadly.

Treat the disease, don't criminalize the alcohol or other materials used by addicts because of their sickness.
UNLESS as in the case of real child porn or snuff videos, the production of the material is already
in violation of rights and laws protecting children, animals etc. from actual harm in the making of the materials.

SassyIrishLass I agree with you we should protect children further;
we do have a MORAL responsibility not to let the trafficking and porn industry PROFIT
off people's sickness and addictions fueling this demand!

But we cannot abuse GOVT to do the work that the CHURCH is supposed to do SPIRITUALLY
in policing sexual lives and behavior. The best solutions I've found to detecting, treating and curing
ADDICTIONS and ABUSE (including extremely dangerous mental and criminal illnesses from
demonic schizophrenia to pedophile addictions and stalking/serial predatory obsessions)
ARE the spiritual healing methods used by Christian and/or Catholic ministries
which work on deep spiritual therapy including generationally inherited sicknesses
that can't be detected (nor prosecuted) by secular standards (though the symptoms
and reduction/cure of them can be quantified/measured and documented by medical science).

The govt cannot simply legislate or regulate this highly and deeply complex process of
spiritual diagnosis and cure of inborn addictions causing criminal illness.

We can set up a process for abuses and threats to be reported so that dangerous
conditions can be DETECTED and REQUIRE intervention to correct deadly illness
from putting the public at risk. So that's GOING AFTER the addiction as a medical
and safety problem, NOT just criminalizing the materials that people use who may have
dangerous levels of addictions not safe for children or other people to be around.

the cure is still a spiritual process that requires voluntary agreement to undergo or it doesn't work.
The cure is based on "forgiveness' of past and current conditions that cause or fuel the addictions.
So nobody (especially not govt!!)
can "force or compel" another person to go through forgiveness, that's not how the process works.

We can order someone to be put into detention who has such a dangerous level of
addiction they are threatening other people. We need to focus on that, on the
medical process of dealing with these abuses and addictions, in order to stop the demand.

SassyIrishLass another side benefit of this approach to decriminalizing mental illness
while making it mandatory to detain CRIMINAL level addiction untl the person can be
diagnosed treated and/or cured is that such an approach will ALSO solve related
problems with "school safety" and risks of gun violence/sex addict teachers etc. that can be
reduced or prevented by screening out the mental health issues BEFORE they harm children.

So with one solution, we can solve MANY problems instead of trying to ban or criminalize the external focus
that isn't addressing the root cause and addictions which are the true danger to children and society.
 

Forum List

Back
Top