Confused about America First Policy

Say there is an earthquake in Chile or Typhoon in Bangladesh. American interest are not affected. Are we sending aid in the form of money or troops to perform rescues? Or do we withhold such aid until they can pay for the help?


Well because of the massive cost of this filthy ass welfare state and the $20 trillion in debt we are in and the increasing poverty and dismal economic that the Kenyan Catastrophe gave us maybe we won't have enough money to help the rest of the world.

Socialism destroys everything including real philanthropy.
 
Well, I'm feeling humane. I think it might be time to take out my concealed handgun and shoot this thread to put it out of our misery.
 
Say there is an earthquake in Chile or Typhoon in Bangladesh. American interest are not affected. Are we sending aid in the form of money or troops to perform rescues? Or do we withhold such aid until they can pay for the help?

Idiot question.

Well, Trump supporters are idiots so I thought you guys would be the ones to ask.

While the statement is blanket in nature anyone with a third grade education knows exactly what he means...only whack-job Libtards who love retard semantics play stupid and act as if they don't know. Further, only un-American piece of shits wouldn't appreciate the statement coming from the top of government.
I'll play along for all the second graders who may be reading the thread...In short, the phrase America First means the wants and needs of REAL American's will be considered paramount...PERIOD!
Specifically, I'm thinking he's tired of watching the Democratic Party smuggle in illegals from the south to ride the back of the American taxpayer while literally trashing every community they settle in.

Real quick, what makes an ordinary American a “real American”?

Not espousing foreign philosophies over American law and tradition is a good start.
 
Say there is an earthquake in Chile or Typhoon in Bangladesh. American interest are not affected. ...


Sure they are.

Really? How so? Chile is a very large nation. Much like an earthquake in Montana may not effect people in Florida…an earthquake in the southern region may not effect our interest in Santiago for example.

We conduct trade with Chile, there are American companies in Chile, and there are Chilean-Americans with a great deal of interest. Don't be myopic.

So…There are Pakistani Americans too. WE do some trade with Pakistan….and we have American companies over there…. Feel good about your dollars flowing freely into Pakistan?


To assist after a natural disaster? I'd feel good about that.
 
Say there is an earthquake in Chile or Typhoon in Bangladesh. American interest are not affected. Are we sending aid in the form of money or troops to perform rescues? Or do we withhold such aid until they can pay for the help?


WTF, stupid or what?

Well, if we’re only going to act when it benefits America…how would sending your tax dollars into nations that do little or nothing for us be “putting America first”?

Just wondering what the term means….do any of you know?
Private individuals can send money to any country they want.

Yes but will US Government aid be going to Nation X under “America First”?
Not unless there is a direct benefit to the US taxpayer. Like I posted earlier, we can't save all the puppies and kittens on the planet. What we should do is encourage other nations to "neuter their pets" so there's no puppies and kittens to worry about.
 
I seem to have missed the implied modifier of “foreign trade, illegal immigration and “other policies”. I mean, what if there was a coup in Chile or Bangladesh…would we try to overthrow the duly elected leaders of those nations (if they have one—just not Chile or Bangladesh—Brazil is a powder keg about to go off too…what if there).
He mentioned it in his inauguration speech. That said, like all Presidents before him, saying is one thing, making it happen is another.

Why would we do so? During the Cold War, shit like that happened, but not today.

So, the answer is no—in both the case of natural disaster or coup where our interests are not explicitly on the line?
That's the way I'd interpret it and I support the idea. The United States government is not the world police nor a global charity. "We, the People" empower it per the Constitution to do as the Preamble states.
 
WTF, stupid or what?

Well, if we’re only going to act when it benefits America…how would sending your tax dollars into nations that do little or nothing for us be “putting America first”?

Just wondering what the term means….do any of you know?

First does, in no way imply ONLY.

So that means we’ll still send money into places with no hope of having it returned…ever?

The Clinton Foundation will send them some aid.
WTF, stupid or what?

Well, if we’re only going to act when it benefits America…how would sending your tax dollars into nations that do little or nothing for us be “putting America first”?

Just wondering what the term means….do any of you know?

First does, in no way imply ONLY.

So that means we’ll still send money into places with no hope of having it returned…ever?

The Clinton Foundation will send them some aid.
I'm sure they would and have in the past.

One thing to remember , all ex presidents get paid big bucks for speeches, and if his wife was SOS so be it, the first time we had such a first lady be a first lady of a state (twice) first lady of a country for 8 years , a senator of a state for 8 years, and a SOS, and also ran for Pres. twice, and won the Pop . vote by 3 million votes last time. You should be bowing down to her.

Unfortunately. the Clinton Foundation is being shut down. It seems the multi-million dollar donations from the Arab countries have completely dried up now that Hillary is no longer in government and cannot give them under the table and illegal favors.
 
Say there is an earthquake in Chile or Typhoon in Bangladesh. American interest are not affected. Are we sending aid in the form of money or troops to perform rescues? Or do we withhold such aid until they can pay for the help?
We are busy right now sending in money and troops to rescue the disaster that is your plantation.....
 
We assist in disasters. We do not airlift entire populations here. We do not send our industry to replace their factories.
 
I put my family first in my life. However, that doesn't mean I won't be loyal to my friends or fair and generous to others.

Liberal have never wanted to have America first. They want socialism first.
 
Well, if we’re only going to act when it benefits America…how would sending your tax dollars into nations that do little or nothing for us be “putting America first”?

Just wondering what the term means….do any of you know?

First does, in no way imply ONLY.

So that means we’ll still send money into places with no hope of having it returned…ever?

The Clinton Foundation will send them some aid.
Well, if we’re only going to act when it benefits America…how would sending your tax dollars into nations that do little or nothing for us be “putting America first”?

Just wondering what the term means….do any of you know?

First does, in no way imply ONLY.

So that means we’ll still send money into places with no hope of having it returned…ever?

The Clinton Foundation will send them some aid.
I'm sure they would and have in the past.

One thing to remember , all ex presidents get paid big bucks for speeches, and if his wife was SOS so be it, the first time we had such a first lady be a first lady of a state (twice) first lady of a country for 8 years , a senator of a state for 8 years, and a SOS, and also ran for Pres. twice, and won the Pop . vote by 3 million votes last time. You should be bowing down to her.

Unfortunately. the Clinton Foundation is being shut down. It seems the multi-million dollar donations from the Arab countries have completely dried up now that Hillary is no longer in government and cannot give them under the table and illegal favors.
Ironic if true.
 

Forum List

Back
Top