Comrade Trump visits CIA headquarters and.....lies

[JimH52]

Trump is more like Kim Jong-un than Ronald Reagan. One can be a patriot without going to the extreme; one can forestall brinkmanship and seek win-win solutions. Brinkmanship is a zero sum game.

That is doubtful. You shouldn't casually discard brinkmanship. Every tool has a use.

Can you give an example? How well do you think Brinkmanship will play, given Spicer's rant today?

The October Missile Crisis.

You need to read:

Thirteen Days: A Memoir of the Cuban Missile Crisis

I read the book years ago and remember the intense negotiations described between JFK and Khrushchev.

"Cold War tensions reached a high point in October 1962 when the United States discovered Soviet nuclear missiles stationed in Cuba. The world appeared to be on the brink of nuclear conflict, but, after a 13-day standoff, Khrushchev agreed to remove the weapons. In return, U.S. President John F. Kennedy, who one year earlier had authorized the failed Bay of Pigs invasion, publicly consented not to attack Cuba. Kennedy also privately agreed to take American nuclear weapons out of Turkey. In July 1963, the United States, the United Kingdom and the Soviet Union negotiated a partial nuclear test ban."

Brinkmanship is sans discussion and negotiations:

Brinkmanship: the art or practice of pursuing a dangerous policy to the limits of safety before stopping, typically in politics. Khrushchev engaged in Brinkmanship, but Kennedy did not, He put our forces on alert:

"In a dramatic televised address to the American public, President John F. Kennedy announces that the Soviet Union has placed nuclear weapons in Cuba and, in response, the United States will establish a blockade around the island to prevent any other offensive weapons from entering Castro’s state. Kennedy also warned the Soviets that any nuclear attack from Cuba would be construed as an act of war, and that the United States would retaliate in kind."

Kennedy announces blockade of Cuba during the Missile Crisis - Oct 22, 1962 - HISTORY.com

Of course Kennedy engaged in brinkmanship. He forced Soviet ships to submit to search or turn around. Plans for a strike were prepared. Brinkmanship was the order of the day.

Kennedy was not a hopeless Narcissist like the Comrade.

 

[Wry Catcher]

From Trump's CIA speech:
---
"There is nobody that feels stronger about the intelligence community and CIA than Donald Trump," he said. "There's nobody."
---

Always a sign of good mental stability, it is, when someone speaks of themselves in the third person.

Not necessarily, it can be used as a rhetorical device, or by a narcissist pretending humility.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Trump is more like Kim Jong-un than Ronald Reagan. One can be a patriot without going to the extreme; one can forestall brinkmanship and seek win-win solutions. Brinkmanship is a zero sum game.

That is doubtful. You shouldn't casually discard brinkmanship. Every tool has a use.

Can you give an example? How well do you think Brinkmanship will play, given Spicer's rant today?

The October Missile Crisis.

You need to read:

Thirteen Days: A Memoir of the Cuban Missile Crisis

I read the book years ago and remember the intense negotiations described between JFK and Khrushchev.

"Cold War tensions reached a high point in October 1962 when the United States discovered Soviet nuclear missiles stationed in Cuba. The world appeared to be on the brink of nuclear conflict, but, after a 13-day standoff, Khrushchev agreed to remove the weapons. In return, U.S. President John F. Kennedy, who one year earlier had authorized the failed Bay of Pigs invasion, publicly consented not to attack Cuba. Kennedy also privately agreed to take American nuclear weapons out of Turkey. In July 1963, the United States, the United Kingdom and the Soviet Union negotiated a partial nuclear test ban."

Brinkmanship is sans discussion and negotiations:

Brinkmanship: the art or practice of pursuing a dangerous policy to the limits of safety before stopping, typically in politics. Khrushchev engaged in Brinkmanship, but Kennedy did not, He put our forces on alert:

"In a dramatic televised address to the American public, President John F. Kennedy announces that the Soviet Union has placed nuclear weapons in Cuba and, in response, the United States will establish a blockade around the island to prevent any other offensive weapons from entering Castro’s state. Kennedy also warned the Soviets that any nuclear attack from Cuba would be construed as an act of war, and that the United States would retaliate in kind."

Kennedy announces blockade of Cuba during the Missile Crisis - Oct 22, 1962 - HISTORY.com

Of course Kennedy engaged in brinkmanship. He forced Soviet ships to submit to search or turn around. Plans for a strike were prepared. Brinkmanship was the order of the day.

Did you read what Khrushchev did and how it differed from Kennedy's reaction? President Kennedy did cause the Russian's to blink, Khrushchev did not cause our President to blink.

 

[Wry Catcher]

And we all lost.

WHY do the RWNJ Pootarians believe that its only libs/Dems who trump will screw?

OP - yep, cracked me up that he even lied about this. Its like he doesn't know we get the news, including videos of his crazy ass lies.

Trump is going to be an absolute disaster for the white working class and the white poor, the people the media is crediting with Trump’s win.

Lower-income whites are not going to suffer from Trump’s restrictions on Muslims traveling, or from his mass deportations, or from his cavalier attitude toward police brutality. In fact, they love him for it.

However, Trump has promised an economic agenda that will increase the ranks of the uninsured by ten to twenty million, that will eliminate crucial safety net programs for low and moderate-income Americans, that could start a trade war that drives up prices and devastates the economy, and that will put in place a tax code that exacerbates inequality and leaves many families with children worse off.

Trump has promised he will make American wealthy. But that doesn't mean all Americans. In fact, he is speaking of the 1%. He has promised to slash their taxes and cut out regulations designed to protect the poor and the working class Americans.

For seniors he is suggested lower premiums. For the poor and middle class? Nope for the top 1% who have seen big premium increases under Obama. He suggested a Medicare voucher program with no mention of current beneficiaries keeping the traditional program. He offered one of the most extreme Social Security privatization proposals.

One might ask, why the middle class workers and the poor working class whites would support Trump. IMHO, they support him because they blame their problems on, Washington, illegal immigrants, and lack of jobs, all which Trump promised to fix. However, of all Trump's promises, these are least likely to happen and the least likely to help these people. The most likely promises that he will keep will not help them

Very superficial observation and simplified to drive a false narrative appealing to the covetousness of simpletons.
This sounds more like demagoguery propaganda from a soap box at Speaker's Corner, Hyde Park in London than a rational analysis.

The irony in this ^^^ post is the author offered a "simplified (effort) to drive a false narrative appealing to the covetousness of simpletons"! If there is any truth to his rant, the simpletons are those who believed Trump could do anything he promised, and they would benefit, and so voted for him.

No, the "simpletons" are the working Americans who voted for Hillary even though she told them straight out that she intended to fuck them up the ass.

..and put coal miners out of business taking the means of their livelihood....

Coal mines are closing not because HRC misspoke, but because the cost of natural gas is much cheaper to obtain and transport, thus less expensive to the end user. Coal fired plants are being refit to natural gas, cleaner and cheaper than coal.

 

[ding]

That is doubtful. You shouldn't casually discard brinkmanship. Every tool has a use.

Can you give an example? How well do you think Brinkmanship will play, given Spicer's rant today?

The October Missile Crisis.

You need to read:

Thirteen Days: A Memoir of the Cuban Missile Crisis

I read the book years ago and remember the intense negotiations described between JFK and Khrushchev.

"Cold War tensions reached a high point in October 1962 when the United States discovered Soviet nuclear missiles stationed in Cuba. The world appeared to be on the brink of nuclear conflict, but, after a 13-day standoff, Khrushchev agreed to remove the weapons. In return, U.S. President John F. Kennedy, who one year earlier had authorized the failed Bay of Pigs invasion, publicly consented not to attack Cuba. Kennedy also privately agreed to take American nuclear weapons out of Turkey. In July 1963, the United States, the United Kingdom and the Soviet Union negotiated a partial nuclear test ban."

Brinkmanship is sans discussion and negotiations:

Brinkmanship: the art or practice of pursuing a dangerous policy to the limits of safety before stopping, typically in politics. Khrushchev engaged in Brinkmanship, but Kennedy did not, He put our forces on alert:

"In a dramatic televised address to the American public, President John F. Kennedy announces that the Soviet Union has placed nuclear weapons in Cuba and, in response, the United States will establish a blockade around the island to prevent any other offensive weapons from entering Castro’s state. Kennedy also warned the Soviets that any nuclear attack from Cuba would be construed as an act of war, and that the United States would retaliate in kind."

Kennedy announces blockade of Cuba during the Missile Crisis - Oct 22, 1962 - HISTORY.com

Of course Kennedy engaged in brinkmanship. He forced Soviet ships to submit to search or turn around. Plans for a strike were prepared. Brinkmanship was the order of the day.

Kennedy was not a hopeless Narcissist like the Comrade.

Give me a break. He was a Kennedy. Probably the best of the lot though. But I agree, Barack was the biggest Narcissist of them all.

 

[ding]

That is doubtful. You shouldn't casually discard brinkmanship. Every tool has a use.

Can you give an example? How well do you think Brinkmanship will play, given Spicer's rant today?

The October Missile Crisis.

You need to read:

Thirteen Days: A Memoir of the Cuban Missile Crisis

I read the book years ago and remember the intense negotiations described between JFK and Khrushchev.

"Cold War tensions reached a high point in October 1962 when the United States discovered Soviet nuclear missiles stationed in Cuba. The world appeared to be on the brink of nuclear conflict, but, after a 13-day standoff, Khrushchev agreed to remove the weapons. In return, U.S. President John F. Kennedy, who one year earlier had authorized the failed Bay of Pigs invasion, publicly consented not to attack Cuba. Kennedy also privately agreed to take American nuclear weapons out of Turkey. In July 1963, the United States, the United Kingdom and the Soviet Union negotiated a partial nuclear test ban."

Brinkmanship is sans discussion and negotiations:

Brinkmanship: the art or practice of pursuing a dangerous policy to the limits of safety before stopping, typically in politics. Khrushchev engaged in Brinkmanship, but Kennedy did not, He put our forces on alert:

"In a dramatic televised address to the American public, President John F. Kennedy announces that the Soviet Union has placed nuclear weapons in Cuba and, in response, the United States will establish a blockade around the island to prevent any other offensive weapons from entering Castro’s state. Kennedy also warned the Soviets that any nuclear attack from Cuba would be construed as an act of war, and that the United States would retaliate in kind."

Kennedy announces blockade of Cuba during the Missile Crisis - Oct 22, 1962 - HISTORY.com

Of course Kennedy engaged in brinkmanship. He forced Soviet ships to submit to search or turn around. Plans for a strike were prepared. Brinkmanship was the order of the day.

Did you read what Khrushchev did and how it differed from Kennedy's reaction? President Kennedy did cause the Russian's to blink, Khrushchev did not cause our President to blink.

I know we were on the brink of war and were prepared to go to war.

 

[bripat9643]

Trump is going to be an absolute disaster for the white working class and the white poor, the people the media is crediting with Trump’s win.

Lower-income whites are not going to suffer from Trump’s restrictions on Muslims traveling, or from his mass deportations, or from his cavalier attitude toward police brutality. In fact, they love him for it.

However, Trump has promised an economic agenda that will increase the ranks of the uninsured by ten to twenty million, that will eliminate crucial safety net programs for low and moderate-income Americans, that could start a trade war that drives up prices and devastates the economy, and that will put in place a tax code that exacerbates inequality and leaves many families with children worse off.

Trump has promised he will make American wealthy. But that doesn't mean all Americans. In fact, he is speaking of the 1%. He has promised to slash their taxes and cut out regulations designed to protect the poor and the working class Americans.

For seniors he is suggested lower premiums. For the poor and middle class? Nope for the top 1% who have seen big premium increases under Obama. He suggested a Medicare voucher program with no mention of current beneficiaries keeping the traditional program. He offered one of the most extreme Social Security privatization proposals.

One might ask, why the middle class workers and the poor working class whites would support Trump. IMHO, they support him because they blame their problems on, Washington, illegal immigrants, and lack of jobs, all which Trump promised to fix. However, of all Trump's promises, these are least likely to happen and the least likely to help these people. The most likely promises that he will keep will not help them

Very superficial observation and simplified to drive a false narrative appealing to the covetousness of simpletons.
This sounds more like demagoguery propaganda from a soap box at Speaker's Corner, Hyde Park in London than a rational analysis.

The irony in this ^^^ post is the author offered a "simplified (effort) to drive a false narrative appealing to the covetousness of simpletons"! If there is any truth to his rant, the simpletons are those who believed Trump could do anything he promised, and they would benefit, and so voted for him.

No, the "simpletons" are the working Americans who voted for Hillary even though she told them straight out that she intended to fuck them up the ass.

..and put coal miners out of business taking the means of their livelihood....

Coal mines are closing not because HRC misspoke, but because the cost of natural gas is much cheaper to obtain and transport, thus less expensive to the end user. Coal fired plants are being refit to natural gas, cleaner and cheaper than coal.

It's cheaper mainly because Obama EPA regulations have driven up the price of coal fired power plants dramatically.

I marvel at how persistent leftwing douche bags are at gas lighting this issue.

 

[defcon4]

Trump is going to be an absolute disaster for the white working class and the white poor, the people the media is crediting with Trump’s win.

Lower-income whites are not going to suffer from Trump’s restrictions on Muslims traveling, or from his mass deportations, or from his cavalier attitude toward police brutality. In fact, they love him for it.

However, Trump has promised an economic agenda that will increase the ranks of the uninsured by ten to twenty million, that will eliminate crucial safety net programs for low and moderate-income Americans, that could start a trade war that drives up prices and devastates the economy, and that will put in place a tax code that exacerbates inequality and leaves many families with children worse off.

Trump has promised he will make American wealthy. But that doesn't mean all Americans. In fact, he is speaking of the 1%. He has promised to slash their taxes and cut out regulations designed to protect the poor and the working class Americans.

For seniors he is suggested lower premiums. For the poor and middle class? Nope for the top 1% who have seen big premium increases under Obama. He suggested a Medicare voucher program with no mention of current beneficiaries keeping the traditional program. He offered one of the most extreme Social Security privatization proposals.

One might ask, why the middle class workers and the poor working class whites would support Trump. IMHO, they support him because they blame their problems on, Washington, illegal immigrants, and lack of jobs, all which Trump promised to fix. However, of all Trump's promises, these are least likely to happen and the least likely to help these people. The most likely promises that he will keep will not help them

Very superficial observation and simplified to drive a false narrative appealing to the covetousness of simpletons.
This sounds more like demagoguery propaganda from a soap box at Speaker's Corner, Hyde Park in London than a rational analysis.

The irony in this ^^^ post is the author offered a "simplified (effort) to drive a false narrative appealing to the covetousness of simpletons"! If there is any truth to his rant, the simpletons are those who believed Trump could do anything he promised, and they would benefit, and so voted for him.

No, the "simpletons" are the working Americans who voted for Hillary even though she told them straight out that she intended to fuck them up the ass.

..and put coal miners out of business taking the means of their livelihood....

Coal mines are closing not because HRC misspoke, but because the cost of natural gas is much cheaper to obtain and transport, thus less expensive to the end user. Coal fired plants are being refit to natural gas, cleaner and cheaper than coal.

Let the demand solve that problem and not regulating the industry out of business. She did not misspoke....she wanted to appease her Green base. Our coal fired power plants emit the cleanest byproducts in the world.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Can you give an example? How well do you think Brinkmanship will play, given Spicer's rant today?

The October Missile Crisis.

You need to read:

Thirteen Days: A Memoir of the Cuban Missile Crisis

I read the book years ago and remember the intense negotiations described between JFK and Khrushchev.

"Cold War tensions reached a high point in October 1962 when the United States discovered Soviet nuclear missiles stationed in Cuba. The world appeared to be on the brink of nuclear conflict, but, after a 13-day standoff, Khrushchev agreed to remove the weapons. In return, U.S. President John F. Kennedy, who one year earlier had authorized the failed Bay of Pigs invasion, publicly consented not to attack Cuba. Kennedy also privately agreed to take American nuclear weapons out of Turkey. In July 1963, the United States, the United Kingdom and the Soviet Union negotiated a partial nuclear test ban."

Brinkmanship is sans discussion and negotiations:

Brinkmanship: the art or practice of pursuing a dangerous policy to the limits of safety before stopping, typically in politics. Khrushchev engaged in Brinkmanship, but Kennedy did not, He put our forces on alert:

"In a dramatic televised address to the American public, President John F. Kennedy announces that the Soviet Union has placed nuclear weapons in Cuba and, in response, the United States will establish a blockade around the island to prevent any other offensive weapons from entering Castro’s state. Kennedy also warned the Soviets that any nuclear attack from Cuba would be construed as an act of war, and that the United States would retaliate in kind."

Kennedy announces blockade of Cuba during the Missile Crisis - Oct 22, 1962 - HISTORY.com

Of course Kennedy engaged in brinkmanship. He forced Soviet ships to submit to search or turn around. Plans for a strike were prepared. Brinkmanship was the order of the day.

Kennedy was not a hopeless Narcissist like the Comrade.

Give me a break. He was a Kennedy. Probably the best of the lot though. But I agree, Barack was the biggest Narcissist of them all.

Wow, another in desperate need of a reality check. If you believe President Obama is a narcissist provide some evidence.

 

[JimH52]

Very superficial observation and simplified to drive a false narrative appealing to the covetousness of simpletons.
This sounds more like demagoguery propaganda from a soap box at Speaker's Corner, Hyde Park in London than a rational analysis.

The irony in this ^^^ post is the author offered a "simplified (effort) to drive a false narrative appealing to the covetousness of simpletons"! If there is any truth to his rant, the simpletons are those who believed Trump could do anything he promised, and they would benefit, and so voted for him.

No, the "simpletons" are the working Americans who voted for Hillary even though she told them straight out that she intended to fuck them up the ass.

..and put coal miners out of business taking the means of their livelihood....

Coal mines are closing not because HRC misspoke, but because the cost of natural gas is much cheaper to obtain and transport, thus less expensive to the end user. Coal fired plants are being refit to natural gas, cleaner and cheaper than coal.

Let the demand solve that problem and not regulating the industry out of business. She did not misspoke....she wanted to appease her Green base. Our coal fired power plants emit the cleanest byproducts in the world.

Link that our coal fired plants emit the cleanest byproducts in the world. If they do and they still emit huge amounts of smog, why would anyone not want to use cheaper natural gas?

What is the Comrade going to do when the coal industry does not come back in four years?

 

[WillReadmore]

Very superficial observation and simplified to drive a false narrative appealing to the covetousness of simpletons.
This sounds more like demagoguery propaganda from a soap box at Speaker's Corner, Hyde Park in London than a rational analysis.

The irony in this ^^^ post is the author offered a "simplified (effort) to drive a false narrative appealing to the covetousness of simpletons"! If there is any truth to his rant, the simpletons are those who believed Trump could do anything he promised, and they would benefit, and so voted for him.

No, the "simpletons" are the working Americans who voted for Hillary even though she told them straight out that she intended to fuck them up the ass.

..and put coal miners out of business taking the means of their livelihood....

Coal mines are closing not because HRC misspoke, but because the cost of natural gas is much cheaper to obtain and transport, thus less expensive to the end user. Coal fired plants are being refit to natural gas, cleaner and cheaper than coal.

Let the demand solve that problem and not regulating the industry out of business. She did not misspoke....she wanted to appease her Green base. Our coal fired power plants emit the cleanest byproducts in the world.

Well, actually the issue is that coal fired power plants are aging out.

And, corporations aren't finding people interested in investing in replacements, because it would require 20 years for such plants to pay out, and there is serious doubt that coal will be an acceptable fuel for that period of time.

And, no, coal is NOT a clean fuel.

 

[edthecynic]

Call him whatever you like, but don't call him boring. He will be like no other president. He is a populist president with a protectionist pledge and a promise to return the power back to the people. What's not to like about that?

Tramp has never kept his promises in the past, be it to his workers, wives, bankers, etc., so what makes you think he will suddenly become honest???

 

[defcon4]

The irony in this ^^^ post is the author offered a "simplified (effort) to drive a false narrative appealing to the covetousness of simpletons"! If there is any truth to his rant, the simpletons are those who believed Trump could do anything he promised, and they would benefit, and so voted for him.

No, the "simpletons" are the working Americans who voted for Hillary even though she told them straight out that she intended to fuck them up the ass.

..and put coal miners out of business taking the means of their livelihood....

Coal mines are closing not because HRC misspoke, but because the cost of natural gas is much cheaper to obtain and transport, thus less expensive to the end user. Coal fired plants are being refit to natural gas, cleaner and cheaper than coal.

Let the demand solve that problem and not regulating the industry out of business. She did not misspoke....she wanted to appease her Green base. Our coal fired power plants emit the cleanest byproducts in the world.

Well, actually the issue is that coal fired power plants are aging out.

And, corporations aren't finding people interested in investing in replacements, because it would require 20 years for such plants to pay out, and there is serious doubt that coal will be an acceptable fuel for that period of time.

And, no, coal is NOT a clean fuel.

Who said it was clean fuel? The rest what you said is agreeable. I stated that let the demand decide and not regulating the industry out of business. Gradual mine closings give time for the miners to reorient toward other possible employment.

 

[edthecynic]

Yes, the did lie about photos. The showed a photo of the National Mall taken early in the morning on the day of Trump's inauguration and compared with a photo of the same area taking during the ceremony at Obama's inauguration.

They are just plain lying scum, and you are one of their sleazy despicable minions

Major projection there Slick!

 

[Wyatt earp]

The irony in this ^^^ post is the author offered a "simplified (effort) to drive a false narrative appealing to the covetousness of simpletons"! If there is any truth to his rant, the simpletons are those who believed Trump could do anything he promised, and they would benefit, and so voted for him.

No, the "simpletons" are the working Americans who voted for Hillary even though she told them straight out that she intended to fuck them up the ass.

..and put coal miners out of business taking the means of their livelihood....

Coal mines are closing not because HRC misspoke, but because the cost of natural gas is much cheaper to obtain and transport, thus less expensive to the end user. Coal fired plants are being refit to natural gas, cleaner and cheaper than coal.

Let the demand solve that problem and not regulating the industry out of business. She did not misspoke....she wanted to appease her Green base. Our coal fired power plants emit the cleanest byproducts in the world.

Well, actually the issue is that coal fired power plants are aging out.

And, corporations aren't finding people interested in investing in replacements, because it would require 20 years for such plants to pay out, and there is serious doubt that coal will be an acceptable fuel for that period of time.

And, no, coal is NOT a clean fuel.

Coal is not clean fuel?

Another kid having a temper tantrum tonight

 

[Wyatt earp]

Yes, the did lie about photos. The showed a photo of the National Mall taken early in the morning on the day of Trump's inauguration and compared with a photo of the same area taking during the ceremony at Obama's inauguration.

They are just plain lying scum, and you are one of their sleazy despicable minions

Major projection there Slick!

Yes, the did lie about photos. The showed a photo of the National Mall taken early in the morning on the day of Trump's inauguration and compared with a photo of the same area taking during the ceremony at Obama's inauguration.

They are just plain lying scum, and you are one of their sleazy despicable minions

Major projection there Slick!

 

[WillReadmore]

No, the "simpletons" are the working Americans who voted for Hillary even though she told them straight out that she intended to fuck them up the ass.

..and put coal miners out of business taking the means of their livelihood....

Coal mines are closing not because HRC misspoke, but because the cost of natural gas is much cheaper to obtain and transport, thus less expensive to the end user. Coal fired plants are being refit to natural gas, cleaner and cheaper than coal.

Let the demand solve that problem and not regulating the industry out of business. She did not misspoke....she wanted to appease her Green base. Our coal fired power plants emit the cleanest byproducts in the world.

Well, actually the issue is that coal fired power plants are aging out.

And, corporations aren't finding people interested in investing in replacements, because it would require 20 years for such plants to pay out, and there is serious doubt that coal will be an acceptable fuel for that period of time.

And, no, coal is NOT a clean fuel.

Coal is not clean fuel?

Another kid having a temper tantrum tonight

lol - I'm just flat out telling you what science clearly demonstrates.

It's you who has zip but ad hom.

 

[Wyatt earp]

..and put coal miners out of business taking the means of their livelihood....

Coal mines are closing not because HRC misspoke, but because the cost of natural gas is much cheaper to obtain and transport, thus less expensive to the end user. Coal fired plants are being refit to natural gas, cleaner and cheaper than coal.

Let the demand solve that problem and not regulating the industry out of business. She did not misspoke....she wanted to appease her Green base. Our coal fired power plants emit the cleanest byproducts in the world.

Well, actually the issue is that coal fired power plants are aging out.

And, corporations aren't finding people interested in investing in replacements, because it would require 20 years for such plants to pay out, and there is serious doubt that coal will be an acceptable fuel for that period of time.

And, no, coal is NOT a clean fuel.

Coal is not clean fuel?

Another kid having a temper tantrum tonight

lol - I'm just flat out telling you what science clearly demonstrates.

It's you who has zip but ad hom.

Who the hell you think your dealing with child? It's the energy that powers your home right now

 

[edthecynic]

Check out Sean Spicer go full on rage monkey. "This was the largest audience to ever witness an inauguration. Period. Both in person and around the globe!"



2nd day and Spicer comes out threatening the press, telling obvious lies, and just raging. Looking pretty silly and childish already. This is gonna be a bigger shit show than even Trump's worst detractors could have ever predicted.

Lying Spicer's own count was only 720,000 yet pathological liar Tramp doubled it and claimed 1.5 million. Both claims are less than the 1.8 million who came to see Obama's inauguration.

From Spicer's presser;
"We know that from the platform where the President was sworn in, to 4th Street, it holds about 250,000 people. From 4th Street to the media tent is about another 220,000. And from the media tent to the Washington Monument, another 250,000 people. All of this space was full when the President took the Oath of Office."

 

[Wyatt earp]

..and put coal miners out of business taking the means of their livelihood....

Coal mines are closing not because HRC misspoke, but because the cost of natural gas is much cheaper to obtain and transport, thus less expensive to the end user. Coal fired plants are being refit to natural gas, cleaner and cheaper than coal.

Let the demand solve that problem and not regulating the industry out of business. She did not misspoke....she wanted to appease her Green base. Our coal fired power plants emit the cleanest byproducts in the world.

Well, actually the issue is that coal fired power plants are aging out.

And, corporations aren't finding people interested in investing in replacements, because it would require 20 years for such plants to pay out, and there is serious doubt that coal will be an acceptable fuel for that period of time.

And, no, coal is NOT a clean fuel.

Coal is not clean fuel?

Another kid having a temper tantrum tonight

lol - I'm just flat out telling you what science clearly demonstrates.

It's you who has zip but ad hom.

I know we're your type gets its power supply..