- Mar 11, 2015
- 77,659
- 36,070
- 2,330
You suffer in the area of perception as it’s limited to what other people you respect have told you as opposed to finding your own knowledge and understanding.The Moors were NOT "Black"/aka sub-Saharan losers.
They were a mixed North African population of mostly Berber descent. Darker in color than S Euyros or Middle Easter Arabs, but not "Black"/sub-Saharan Stock.
Moors - Wikipedia
The term "Moors" refers primarily to the Muslim inhabitants of the Maghreb, the Iberian Peninsula, Sicily, and Malta during the Middle Ages. The Moors initially were the indigenous Maghrebine Berbers.[1] The name was later also applied to Arabs.[2][3]
Moors are Not a distinct or self-defined people,[4] and the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica observed that "The term 'Moors' has no real ethnological value."[5] Europeans of the Middle Ages and the early modern period variously applied the name to Arabs, North African Berbers, and Muslim Europeans.[6]
The term has also been used in Europe in a broader, somewhat derogatory sense to refer to Muslims in general,[7] especially those of Arab or Berber descent, whether living in Spain or North Africa.[8] During the colonial era, the Portuguese introduced the names "Ceylon Moors" and "Indian Moors" in South Asia and Sri Lanka, and the Bengali Muslims were also called Moors.[9] In the Philippines, the longstanding Muslim community, which predates the arrival of the Spanish, now self-identifies as the "Moro people", an exonym introduced by Spanish colonizers due to their Muslim faith.
In 711, troops mostly formed by Moors from northern Africa led the Umayyad conquest of Hispania. The Iberian peninsula then came to be known in Classical Arabic as al-Andalus, which at its peak included most of Septimania and modern-day Spain and Portugal.
[......]]
Yet they run the BBC, CNN, the New York Times, Harvard, Oxford and Cambridge. They write most of the Hollywood films and Wikipedia articles. They even own and run nearly all the main bits of the global Talking Machine.
- Less than 22% of the world is white.
- Less than 11% of the world is white and male.
- Less than 2.3% of the world is white, male and speaks English.
You're like most people in that you've learned most of what they know about the world at large from English-speaking white men, from 2.2% of that world, a 2.2% that has a limited, racist view on things.
End of the day wiki articles are written by whites with the same racism as anyone else. You may believe everything they tell you I don't.
This is not about blame. Instead it is a warning against being overly dependent on any one part of the world for your knowledge of the world as a whole.
I'm sure my observations seem like"junk-science" or "radical" interpretations..
All news channels (Wiki included) have agendas and black tends to be the victim of these agendas.
Education doesn't equal intelligence,intelligence doesn't equal knowledge, knowledge doesn't equal understanding,and understanding doesn't equal wisdom.
Observe, find you own understanding outside the books, or even other people. Calling me radical is the ultimate compliment,cause that means I'm blazing my own path, long as I keep moving, its all good.
Amen!
These idiots have no real clue about what a true independent thinking black man/woman is. To them independent black thinking is blacks that say what they believe.