Comey's Letter Bombshell

Clinton is the only subject on many right wingers minds.


weird, huh? :doubt:




1p5u03.jpg
 
It's amusing that even as they "investigate" an alleged Trump/Russia connection and find nothing, we keep finding out little tidbits of info raising questions about those very investigators/witnesses.

"Find nothing"??? They didn't convene a federal Grand Jury and a Grand Jury in New York because they had "found nothing". They didn't get a search warrant for Paul Manaforte's house without probable cause.

Trump isn't shitting his pants on a daily basis over the Russian Investigation because they've "found nothing".

Clinton is the only subject on many right wingers minds.

I also enjoy football and GoT.

You know it's bullshit that Comey wrote his speech before interviewing 17 witnesses, including Hillary.

Pretend it was Mueller, who already wrote a speech exonerating Trump. Now you don't like it....see how easy that was to identify your own hypocrisy?
 
It's amusing that even as they "investigate" an alleged Trump/Russia connection and find nothing, we keep finding out little tidbits of info raising questions about those very investigators/witnesses.

"Find nothing"??? They didn't convene a federal Grand Jury and a Grand Jury in New York because they had "found nothing". They didn't get a search warrant for Paul Manaforte's house without probable cause.

Trump isn't shitting his pants on a daily basis over the Russian Investigation because they've "found nothing".

So. What do they have?

Secrets are not well kept these days. If there was evidence of collusion, we would know, and the Democrats would be unable to hide their glee.

The Left's reaction to Rohrbacher's contact with Assange is far more interesting.
 
It's amusing that even as they "investigate" an alleged Trump/Russia connection and find nothing, we keep finding out little tidbits of info raising questions about those very investigators/witnesses.

"Find nothing"??? They didn't convene a federal Grand Jury and a Grand Jury in New York because they had "found nothing". They didn't get a search warrant for Paul Manaforte's house without probable cause.

Trump isn't shitting his pants on a daily basis over the Russian Investigation because they've "found nothing".

Clinton is the only subject on many right wingers minds.

I also enjoy football and GoT.

You know it's bullshit that Comey wrote his speech before interviewing 17 witnesses, including Hillary.

Pretend it was Mueller, who already wrote a speech exonerating Trump. Now you don't like it....see how easy that was to identify your own hypocrisy?

If he finds no evidence, end the investigation(.) You do not read my posts, I do not see Trump as crooked, as much as self centered, selfish, and uninformed. STILL TO EARLY TO JUDGE HOWEVER(.)
 
A person familiar with the matter pushed back on the notion that Comey had already reached a conclusion that affected the investigation.

The person said back in spring 2016, agents and Justice Department officials were talking about how the investigation would end and there was a belief that the evidence was going in a direction to not support bringing charges. This individual said by April 2016 the FBI had reviewed most of the evidence and didn't find evidence suggesting that Clinton had violated federal law. The person said the FBI wanted to interview her but didn't believe it was going to change the outcome.

The source also said Comey was not involved in the day-to-day steps of the investigation, so even if he reached a conclusion it wouldn't have affected the result of the investigation.

A second person familiar with the matter told CNN that Comey had not already made up his mind, and that it did not influence the investigation. The second source says the FBI had already reviewed much of the evidence by spring and it was becoming more clear that it was not likely to support bringing charges.
 
A person familiar with the matter pushed back on the notion that Comey had already reached a conclusion that affected the investigation.

The person said back in spring 2016, agents and Justice Department officials were talking about how the investigation would end and there was a belief that the evidence was going in a direction to not support bringing charges. This individual said by April 2016 the FBI had reviewed most of the evidence and didn't find evidence suggesting that Clinton had violated federal law. The person said the FBI wanted to interview her but didn't believe it was going to change the outcome.

The source also said Comey was not involved in the day-to-day steps of the investigation, so even if he reached a conclusion it wouldn't have affected the result of the investigation.

A second person familiar with the matter told CNN that Comey had not already made up his mind, and that it did not influence the investigation. The second source says the FBI had already reviewed much of the evidence by spring and it was becoming more clear that it was not likely to support bringing charges.

Who?
 
A person familiar with the matter pushed back on the notion that Comey had already reached a conclusion that affected the investigation.

The person said back in spring 2016, agents and Justice Department officials were talking about how the investigation would end and there was a belief that the evidence was going in a direction to not support bringing charges. This individual said by April 2016 the FBI had reviewed most of the evidence and didn't find evidence suggesting that Clinton had violated federal law. The person said the FBI wanted to interview her but didn't believe it was going to change the outcome.

The source also said Comey was not involved in the day-to-day steps of the investigation, so even if he reached a conclusion it wouldn't have affected the result of the investigation.

A second person familiar with the matter told CNN that Comey had not already made up his mind, and that it did not influence the investigation. The second source says the FBI had already reviewed much of the evidence by spring and it was becoming more clear that it was not likely to support bringing charges.

Who?
Former Comey aides.
 
A person familiar with the matter pushed back on the notion that Comey had already reached a conclusion that affected the investigation.

The person said back in spring 2016, agents and Justice Department officials were talking about how the investigation would end and there was a belief that the evidence was going in a direction to not support bringing charges. This individual said by April 2016 the FBI had reviewed most of the evidence and didn't find evidence suggesting that Clinton had violated federal law. The person said the FBI wanted to interview her but didn't believe it was going to change the outcome.

The source also said Comey was not involved in the day-to-day steps of the investigation, so even if he reached a conclusion it wouldn't have affected the result of the investigation.

A second person familiar with the matter told CNN that Comey had not already made up his mind, and that it did not influence the investigation. The second source says the FBI had already reviewed much of the evidence by spring and it was becoming more clear that it was not likely to support bringing charges.

How is this a "bombshell" as Clinton is a private citizen; is Comey expected to give evidence in the 'Russia scandal', against Trump?
 
Donald Trump is not going to be impeached, Hillary Clinton is not going to be locked up, and the Beatles are not getting back together.
 
A person familiar with the matter pushed back on the notion that Comey had already reached a conclusion that affected the investigation.

The person said back in spring 2016, agents and Justice Department officials were talking about how the investigation would end and there was a belief that the evidence was going in a direction to not support bringing charges. This individual said by April 2016 the FBI had reviewed most of the evidence and didn't find evidence suggesting that Clinton had violated federal law. The person said the FBI wanted to interview her but didn't believe it was going to change the outcome.

The source also said Comey was not involved in the day-to-day steps of the investigation, so even if he reached a conclusion it wouldn't have affected the result of the investigation.

A second person familiar with the matter told CNN that Comey had not already made up his mind, and that it did not influence the investigation. The second source says the FBI had already reviewed much of the evidence by spring and it was becoming more clear that it was not likely to support bringing charges.

How is this a "bombshell" as Clinton is a private citizen; is Comey expected to give evidence in the 'Russia scandal', against Trump?
Everything is a "bombshell" or "breaking" with the piss drinking rubes. The propaganda masters have them dancing like little marionettes.
 
A person familiar with the matter pushed back on the notion that Comey had already reached a conclusion that affected the investigation.

The person said back in spring 2016, agents and Justice Department officials were talking about how the investigation would end and there was a belief that the evidence was going in a direction to not support bringing charges. This individual said by April 2016 the FBI had reviewed most of the evidence and didn't find evidence suggesting that Clinton had violated federal law. The person said the FBI wanted to interview her but didn't believe it was going to change the outcome.

The source also said Comey was not involved in the day-to-day steps of the investigation, so even if he reached a conclusion it wouldn't have affected the result of the investigation.

A second person familiar with the matter told CNN that Comey had not already made up his mind, and that it did not influence the investigation. The second source says the FBI had already reviewed much of the evidence by spring and it was becoming more clear that it was not likely to support bringing charges.

Who?
Former Comey aides.

Who says, and why should I believe them?
 
A person familiar with the matter pushed back on the notion that Comey had already reached a conclusion that affected the investigation.

The person said back in spring 2016, agents and Justice Department officials were talking about how the investigation would end and there was a belief that the evidence was going in a direction to not support bringing charges. This individual said by April 2016 the FBI had reviewed most of the evidence and didn't find evidence suggesting that Clinton had violated federal law. The person said the FBI wanted to interview her but didn't believe it was going to change the outcome.

The source also said Comey was not involved in the day-to-day steps of the investigation, so even if he reached a conclusion it wouldn't have affected the result of the investigation.

A second person familiar with the matter told CNN that Comey had not already made up his mind, and that it did not influence the investigation. The second source says the FBI had already reviewed much of the evidence by spring and it was becoming more clear that it was not likely to support bringing charges.

Who?
Former Comey aides.

Who says, and why should I believe them?
You're busted, hypocrite.

The OP is based on information from "former Comey aides" and you never questioned it.

Comey prepared the draft exoneration for Clinton before conducting interviews with top Clinton aides who were offered immunity for their cooperation, Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley and Sen. Lindsey Graham said Thursday in a joint statement, citing transcripts of interviews with former Comey aides obtained by the Senate judiciary committee.

You never asked, "Who?"

 
A person familiar with the matter pushed back on the notion that Comey had already reached a conclusion that affected the investigation.

The person said back in spring 2016, agents and Justice Department officials were talking about how the investigation would end and there was a belief that the evidence was going in a direction to not support bringing charges. This individual said by April 2016 the FBI had reviewed most of the evidence and didn't find evidence suggesting that Clinton had violated federal law. The person said the FBI wanted to interview her but didn't believe it was going to change the outcome.

The source also said Comey was not involved in the day-to-day steps of the investigation, so even if he reached a conclusion it wouldn't have affected the result of the investigation.

A second person familiar with the matter told CNN that Comey had not already made up his mind, and that it did not influence the investigation. The second source says the FBI had already reviewed much of the evidence by spring and it was becoming more clear that it was not likely to support bringing charges.

How is this a "bombshell" as Clinton is a private citizen; is Comey expected to give evidence in the 'Russia scandal', against Trump?
The bitch wasn't a "private citizen" when she was SOS you MORON!
 
BREAKINGBOMBSHELL: RUBES STILL FALLING FOR HILLARY IMMINENT INDICTMENT STORIES FOR FOURTH YEAR IN A ROW!!!

USMB - The champagne has gone flat, the cake is stale, but the tards are still wearing their party hats, waiting for the signal that will never come.

"I haven't gone to the bathroom in eighteen months", one creduloid who is literally full of shit stated. "I'm worried the indictment will come down while I'm taking a dump and I'll miss my chance to be the first to post about it."

As they talk in excited tones in their huddled groups, the eyes of the lonely chumps are constantly darting to their propaganda news sites, hoping against hope that today is finally the day.

"I heard an anonymous inside source has said an FBI agent said a judge has just signed a Tase on Sight (TOS) order for Hillary Clinton!", one dupe titters excitedly. "It's happening! It's finally happening!"

But, it isn't happening. It is never happening. And as the sun rises after another long lonely night's vigil and heartbreak, the saps wander blearily-eyed toward the nearest Dunkin Donuts with free wifi to recharge their pathetic souls with black coffee and day old crullers.

"It's being signed right now. I just know it, " one mutters to another as he checks his phone's signal strength.
 

Forum List

Back
Top