Come on, cons. You loved to talk about snow in Boston...now please talk about heat in Iran please

[westwall]

Weather is not climate.

Sooooooo, does that mean the next time it is really hot someplace, you're not going to bleat about it?

 

[Katzndogz]

You have to love heat index idiots who try and make this some kind of ground breaking event.
How long have we used the so called "heat index" method of temp reporting?
It was invented in 1978 but I cant really nail down when it became common in weather forecasting.

This shits only been around for 37 years and you want to make a big deal about it. The hubris .....

Was the winter in the Northeast a ground breaking event.? And don't tell me conservatives didn't go gaga about Boston last winter, or I will cocksmack you.

Here is the difference although i doubt you could understand it. The heat index in Iran is arrived at by using various separate factors to increase what the temperature feels like. In Boston the broken records were not arrived at by attributing separate factors to determine what cold feels like, but how many feet of snow had fallen. Snowfall is demonstrable, measurable and not subject to the wind chill.

The record broken was how many feet of snow had fallen in the particular period of time. It was no colder than normal.

 

[Papageorgio]

Feels like 164 doesn't mean it is. Troll Alert!

ROFL moron thinks he knows what 164 feels like.

114 is nothing gets that hot here in TX most summers. Only mamby pambies cry about it. Is that what you are?

But did you ever observe to your fellow cons that Boston was not a record?

Not sure why you obsess over Boston's winter weather. I really do t care.

 

[Old Rocks]

In related news, NYC survived the predicted flood.
The North Pole still has ice, and lots of it.
No major waves of cat5 hurricanes
and fracking does not cause earthquakes that can be felt.

Can you tell me which scientist predicted that NYC would not survive a flood by now?
Or are you making shit up?

Climate change report makes doomsday predictions for NYC - NY Daily News

A report by the New York City Panel on Climate Change predicts that average temperatures could jump nearly 9 degrees, rainfall could increase 13% and sea levels would increase by over two feet, meaning the daily high tides in places like Queens would cause daily flooding.

The scientists that made this prediction are on the upper limits of the possible effects of climate change. The predictions I have seen for 2050 by mainstream scientists speak of a temperature increase of 1 to 2 degrees C, from the baseline of 1880, a sea level rise of 2 to 3 feet from that same baseline, and an increase, not specified by most, in precipitation events. But the mainstream scientists have been wrong before. We were not supposed to be where we are now with the Arctic Ice until 2050 to 2080.

 

[Old Rocks]

You have to love heat index idiots who try and make this some kind of ground breaking event.
How long have we used the so called "heat index" method of temp reporting?
It was invented in 1978 but I cant really nail down when it became common in weather forecasting.

This shits only been around for 37 years and you want to make a big deal about it. The hubris .....

Was the winter in the Northeast a ground breaking event.? And don't tell me conservatives didn't go gaga about Boston last winter, or I will cocksmack you.

Here is the difference although i doubt you could understand it. The heat index in Iran is arrived at by using various separate factors to increase what the temperature feels like. In Boston the broken records were not arrived at by attributing separate factors to determine what cold feels like, but how many feet of snow had fallen. Snowfall is demonstrable, measurable and not subject to the wind chill.

The record broken was how many feet of snow had fallen in the particular period of time. It was no colder than normal.

Which, of course, makes that a precipitation event.

 

[Godboy]

If global warming wipes out the middle east, is it really such a bad thing? Maybe its just nature taking out the trash. This could end up being a blessing in disguise.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Do you really think the temperature is 164 degrees? It's not. It's no hotter than it ever has been. By adding other factors, the heat index is raised to 164 degrees. The heat index is whatever the "experts" say it is.

These people have no sense in their wild claims. If it was really 164 degrees, people would be dying in the millions. Leftists are the dumbing down of America.

 

[Unkotare]

What would you like to discuss? You are not being a hypocrite and trying to use weather are you?

Any way hot but not quite record hot.

Apocalpytic Iran Heat Wave Nearly Breaks World Record

Was the cold in Boston a record? Remember, you just implied that if it's not a record it's not worth talking about.

Boston breaks snowfall record - The Boston Globe

 

[ninja007]

Don't be shy.
Searing 164-degree temps in Iran as heat dome traps Middle East Fox News

breaking news- its very very hot in the DESERT!

 

[Freewill]

If global warming wipes out the middle east, is it really such a bad thing? Maybe its just nature taking out the trash. This could end up being a blessing in disguise.

They may try to migrate, or are already.

 

[Two Thumbs]

In related news, NYC survived the predicted flood.
The North Pole still has ice, and lots of it.
No major waves of cat5 hurricanes
and fracking does not cause earthquakes that can be felt.

Can you tell me which scientist predicted that NYC would not survive a flood by now?
Or are you making shit up?

Climate change report makes doomsday predictions for NYC - NY Daily News

A report by the New York City Panel on Climate Change predicts that average temperatures could jump nearly 9 degrees, rainfall could increase 13% and sea levels would increase by over two feet, meaning the daily high tides in places like Queens would cause daily flooding.

The scientists that made this prediction are on the upper limits of the possible effects of climate change. The predictions I have seen for 2050 by mainstream scientists speak of a temperature increase of 1 to 2 degrees C, from the baseline of 1880, a sea level rise of 2 to 3 feet from that same baseline, and an increase, not specified by most, in precipitation events. But the mainstream scientists have been wrong before. We were not supposed to be where we are now with the Arctic Ice until 2050 to 2080.

they haven't gotten a single prediction right yet.

that was my point, you buy into all the fear mongering and demand that my money go to these snake oil sellers debt be damned!

but you never look at how often they are VERY wrong.