Contumacious
Radical Freedom
The new Pentagon papers
A high-ranking military officer reveals how Defense Department extremists suppressed information and twisted the truth to drive the country to war.
Karen Kwiatkowski
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The new Pentagon papers
A high-ranking military officer reveals how Defense Department extremists suppressed information and twisted the truth to drive the country to war.
Karen Kwiatkowski
They suppressed information and twisted the truth???Defense Department extremists suppressed information and twisted the truth
Textbook deflection.They suppressed information and twisted the truth???Defense Department extremists suppressed information and twisted the truth
Who do they think they are? DEMOCRATS???
Republicans can't be allowed to do such things. Only Democrats can.
Don't they know that?
Textbook deflection.They suppressed information and twisted the truth???Defense Department extremists suppressed information and twisted the truth
Who do they think they are? DEMOCRATS???
Republicans can't be allowed to do such things. Only Democrats can.
Don't they know that?
They suppressed information and twisted the truth???Defense Department extremists suppressed information and twisted the truth
Who do they think they are? DEMOCRATS???
Republicans can't be allowed to do such things. Only Democrats can.
Don't they know that?
The new Pentagon papers
A high-ranking military officer reveals how Defense Department extremists suppressed information and twisted the truth to drive the country to war.
Karen Kwiatkowski
The new Pentagon papers
A high-ranking military officer reveals how Defense Department extremists suppressed information and twisted the truth to drive the country to war.
Karen Kwiatkowski
She was a Lieutenant Colonel which is an 0-5 in the AirForce. That's barely a field grade officer and well away from a general grade. So you can drop the term "high ranking" from your vocabulary. Most career officers achieve the ranks of major and lieutenant colonel. In the Air Force the rank is given out like candy. Likewise, Air Force intelligence deals with.. ... you got it !!!, Air threats, air assets, weather, and air capabilities. Good luck using her as an authority on Iraq.
The new Pentagon papers
A high-ranking military officer reveals how Defense Department extremists suppressed information and twisted the truth to drive the country to war.
Karen Kwiatkowski
She was a Lieutenant Colonel which is an 0-5 in the AirForce. That's barely a field grade officer and well away from a general grade. So you can drop the term "high ranking" from your vocabulary. Most career officers achieve the ranks of major and lieutenant colonel. In the Air Force the rank is given out like candy. Likewise, Air Force intelligence deals with.. ... you got it !!!, Air threats, air assets, weather, and air capabilities. Good luck using her as an authority on Iraq.
What the fuck do either her rank, or the domain the article is hosted on, have to do with the content?
Talk about deflections....
The new Pentagon papers
A high-ranking military officer reveals how Defense Department extremists suppressed information and twisted the truth to drive the country to war.
Karen Kwiatkowski
She was a Lieutenant Colonel which is an 0-5 in the AirForce. That's barely a field grade officer and well away from a general grade. So you can drop the term "high ranking" from your vocabulary. Most career officers achieve the ranks of major and lieutenant colonel. In the Air Force the rank is given out like candy. Likewise, Air Force intelligence deals with.. ... you got it !!!, Air threats, air assets, weather, and air capabilities. Good luck using her as an authority on Iraq.
What the fuck do either her rank, or the domain the article is hosted on, have to do with the content?
Talk about deflections....
Moreover the phrase "high ranking" is part of the subtitle on the link page itself. More moreover, the phrase could refer to her being "communications officer in the field and in acquisition programs, a speechwriter for the National Security Agency director, and on the Headquarters Air Force and the office of the secretary of defense staffs covering African affairs".
The new Pentagon papers
A high-ranking military officer reveals how Defense Department extremists suppressed information and twisted the truth to drive the country to war.
Karen Kwiatkowski
She was a Lieutenant Colonel which is an 0-5 in the AirForce. That's barely a field grade officer and well away from a general grade. So you can drop the term "high ranking" from your vocabulary. Most career officers achieve the ranks of major and lieutenant colonel. In the Air Force the rank is given out like candy. Likewise, Air Force intelligence deals with.. ... you got it !!!, Air threats, air assets, weather, and air capabilities. Good luck using her as an authority on Iraq.
What the fuck do either her rank, or the domain the article is hosted on, have to do with the content?
Talk about deflections....
Look at the title of the post. "High Ranking" it says, does it not? Why post it? Because obviously someone thinks it brings credibility to the "content." Next she derives her "bonifides" as an intelligence professional. Indeed she was, with respect to all things "Air."
A LTC would be in a position to observe easily and judge the higher brass and its behavior. Good luck on using Publius 1787 who has no rank or objectivity as a judge of Pentagon officials' cred on these subjects.
The new Pentagon papers
A high-ranking military officer reveals how Defense Department extremists suppressed information and twisted the truth to drive the country to war.
Karen Kwiatkowski
She was a Lieutenant Colonel which is an 0-5 in the AirForce. That's barely a field grade officer and well away from a general grade. So you can drop the term "high ranking" from your vocabulary. Most career officers achieve the ranks of major and lieutenant colonel. In the Air Force the rank is given out like candy. Likewise, Air Force intelligence deals with.. ... you got it !!!, Air threats, air assets, weather, and air capabilities. Good luck using her as an authority on Iraq.
What the fuck do either her rank, or the domain the article is hosted on, have to do with the content?
Talk about deflections....
Look at the title of the post. "High Ranking" it says, does it not? Why post it? Because obviously someone thinks it brings credibility to the "content." Next she derives her "bonifides" as an intelligence professional. Indeed she was, with respect to all things "Air."
That's a lot of words; you could have just said "I'm poisoning the well because I have no argument".
The new Pentagon papers
A high-ranking military officer reveals how Defense Department extremists suppressed information and twisted the truth to drive the country to war.
Karen Kwiatkowski
She was a Lieutenant Colonel which is an 0-5 in the AirForce. That's barely a field grade officer and well away from a general grade. So you can drop the term "high ranking" from your vocabulary. Most career officers achieve the ranks of major and lieutenant colonel. In the Air Force the rank is given out like candy. Likewise, Air Force intelligence deals with.. ... you got it !!!, Air threats, air assets, weather, and air capabilities. Good luck using her as an authority on Iraq.
What the fuck do either her rank, or the domain the article is hosted on, have to do with the content?
Talk about deflections....
Moreover the phrase "high ranking" is part of the subtitle on the link page itself. More moreover, the phrase could refer to her being "communications officer in the field and in acquisition programs, a speechwriter for the National Security Agency director, and on the Headquarters Air Force and the office of the secretary of defense staffs covering African affairs".
Salon is not a credible source. GEt back to me when this story grows some legs.
You have no cred, Publius, to make such a judgment.And "their" behavior.A LTC would be in a position to observe easily and judge the higher brass and its behavior. Good luck on using Publius 1787 who has no rank or objectivity as a judge of Pentagon officials' cred on these subjects.
The new Pentagon papers
A high-ranking military officer reveals how Defense Department extremists suppressed information and twisted the truth to drive the country to war.
Karen Kwiatkowski
She was a Lieutenant Colonel which is an 0-5 in the AirForce. That's barely a field grade officer and well away from a general grade. So you can drop the term "high ranking" from your vocabulary. Most career officers achieve the ranks of major and lieutenant colonel. In the Air Force the rank is given out like candy. Likewise, Air Force intelligence deals with.. ... you got it !!!, Air threats, air assets, weather, and air capabilities. Good luck using her as an authority on Iraq.
What the fuck do either her rank, or the domain the article is hosted on, have to do with the content?
Talk about deflections....
Look at the title of the post. "High Ranking" it says, does it not? Why post it? Because obviously someone thinks it brings credibility to the "content." Next she derives her "bonifides" as an intelligence professional. Indeed she was, with respect to all things "Air."
That's a lot of words; you could have just said "I'm poisoning the well because I have no argument".
Indeed, to you a few lines might be "a lot of words."
You have no cred, Publius, to make such a judgment.And "their" behavior.A LTC would be in a position to observe easily and judge the higher brass and its behavior. Good luck on using Publius 1787 who has no rank or objectivity as a judge of Pentagon officials' cred on these subjects.
By saying without any support that LTC K is not qualified. Who are you to say that?You have no cred, Publius, to make such a judgment.And "their" behavior.A LTC would be in a position to observe easily and judge the higher brass and its behavior. Good luck on using Publius 1787 who has no rank or objectivity as a judge of Pentagon officials' cred on these subjects.
Please, tell me where my observation goes astray then.