Col Karen Kwiatkowski, USAF : Bush Lied About WMDs to Justify Iraq War !!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Contumacious]

The new Pentagon papers

A high-ranking military officer reveals how Defense Department extremists suppressed information and twisted the truth to drive the country to war.

Karen Kwiatkowski

 

[Contumacious]

The new Pentagon papers

A high-ranking military officer reveals how Defense Department extremists suppressed information and twisted the truth to drive the country to war.

Karen Kwiatkowski

From May 2002 until February 2003, I observed firsthand the formation of the Pentagon’s Office of Special Plans and watched the latter stages of the neoconservative capture of the policy-intelligence nexus in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq. This seizure of the reins of U.S. Middle East policy was directly visible to many of us working in the Near East South Asia policy office, and yet there seemed to be little any of us could do about it.



Karen Kwiatkowski

 

[Little-Acorn]

Defense Department extremists suppressed information and twisted the truth

They suppressed information and twisted the truth???

Who do they think they are? DEMOCRATS???

Republicans can't be allowed to do such things. Only Democrats can.

Don't they know that?

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

Defense Department extremists suppressed information and twisted the truth

They suppressed information and twisted the truth???

Who do they think they are? DEMOCRATS???

Republicans can't be allowed to do such things. Only Democrats can.

Don't they know that?

Textbook deflection.

 

[Pogo]

Defense Department extremists suppressed information and twisted the truth

They suppressed information and twisted the truth???

Who do they think they are? DEMOCRATS???

Republicans can't be allowed to do such things. Only Democrats can.

Don't they know that?

Textbook deflection.

He's the Boy in the Bubble.

 

[Contumacious]

Defense Department extremists suppressed information and twisted the truth

They suppressed information and twisted the truth???

Who do they think they are? DEMOCRATS???

Republicans can't be allowed to do such things. Only Democrats can.

Don't they know that?

The bad news is that the Military Industrial Complex-Warmonger axis controls BOTH political parties.


.

 

[Correll]

Salon?

 

[Pogo]

Salon?

?
Does that domain not work in your browser then?

 

[Publius1787]

The new Pentagon papers

A high-ranking military officer reveals how Defense Department extremists suppressed information and twisted the truth to drive the country to war.

Karen Kwiatkowski

She was a Lieutenant Colonel which is an 0-5 in the AirForce. That's barely a field grade officer and well away from a general grade. So you can drop the term "high ranking" from your vocabulary. Most career officers achieve the ranks of major and lieutenant colonel. In the Air Force the rank is given out like candy. Likewise, Air Force intelligence deals with.. ... you got it !!!, Air threats, air assets, weather, and air capabilities. Good luck using her as an authority on Iraq.

 

[Pogo]

The new Pentagon papers

A high-ranking military officer reveals how Defense Department extremists suppressed information and twisted the truth to drive the country to war.

Karen Kwiatkowski

She was a Lieutenant Colonel which is an 0-5 in the AirForce. That's barely a field grade officer and well away from a general grade. So you can drop the term "high ranking" from your vocabulary. Most career officers achieve the ranks of major and lieutenant colonel. In the Air Force the rank is given out like candy. Likewise, Air Force intelligence deals with.. ... you got it !!!, Air threats, air assets, weather, and air capabilities. Good luck using her as an authority on Iraq.

What the fuck do either her rank, or the domain the article is hosted on, have to do with the content?

Talk about deflections....

Moreover the phrase "high ranking" is part of the subtitle on the link page itself. More moreover, the phrase could refer to her being "communications officer in the field and in acquisition programs, a speechwriter for the National Security Agency director, and on the Headquarters Air Force and the office of the secretary of defense staffs covering African affairs".

 

[Publius1787]

The new Pentagon papers

A high-ranking military officer reveals how Defense Department extremists suppressed information and twisted the truth to drive the country to war.

Karen Kwiatkowski

She was a Lieutenant Colonel which is an 0-5 in the AirForce. That's barely a field grade officer and well away from a general grade. So you can drop the term "high ranking" from your vocabulary. Most career officers achieve the ranks of major and lieutenant colonel. In the Air Force the rank is given out like candy. Likewise, Air Force intelligence deals with.. ... you got it !!!, Air threats, air assets, weather, and air capabilities. Good luck using her as an authority on Iraq.

What the fuck do either her rank, or the domain the article is hosted on, have to do with the content?

Talk about deflections....

Look at the title of the post. "High Ranking" it says, does it not? Why post it? Because obviously someone thinks it brings credibility to the "content." Next she derives her "bonifides" as an intelligence professional. Indeed she was, with respect to all things "Air."

 

[Correll]

The new Pentagon papers

A high-ranking military officer reveals how Defense Department extremists suppressed information and twisted the truth to drive the country to war.

Karen Kwiatkowski

She was a Lieutenant Colonel which is an 0-5 in the AirForce. That's barely a field grade officer and well away from a general grade. So you can drop the term "high ranking" from your vocabulary. Most career officers achieve the ranks of major and lieutenant colonel. In the Air Force the rank is given out like candy. Likewise, Air Force intelligence deals with.. ... you got it !!!, Air threats, air assets, weather, and air capabilities. Good luck using her as an authority on Iraq.

What the fuck do either her rank, or the domain the article is hosted on, have to do with the content?

Talk about deflections....

Moreover the phrase "high ranking" is part of the subtitle on the link page itself. More moreover, the phrase could refer to her being "communications officer in the field and in acquisition programs, a speechwriter for the National Security Agency director, and on the Headquarters Air Force and the office of the secretary of defense staffs covering African affairs".

Salon is not a credible source. GEt back to me when this story grows some legs.

 

[Pogo]

The new Pentagon papers

A high-ranking military officer reveals how Defense Department extremists suppressed information and twisted the truth to drive the country to war.

Karen Kwiatkowski

She was a Lieutenant Colonel which is an 0-5 in the AirForce. That's barely a field grade officer and well away from a general grade. So you can drop the term "high ranking" from your vocabulary. Most career officers achieve the ranks of major and lieutenant colonel. In the Air Force the rank is given out like candy. Likewise, Air Force intelligence deals with.. ... you got it !!!, Air threats, air assets, weather, and air capabilities. Good luck using her as an authority on Iraq.

What the fuck do either her rank, or the domain the article is hosted on, have to do with the content?

Talk about deflections....

Look at the title of the post. "High Ranking" it says, does it not? Why post it? Because obviously someone thinks it brings credibility to the "content." Next she derives her "bonifides" as an intelligence professional. Indeed she was, with respect to all things "Air."

That's a lot of words; you could have just said "I'm poisoning the well because I have no argument".

 

[Publius1787]

A LTC would be in a position to observe easily and judge the higher brass and its behavior. Good luck on using Publius 1787 who has no rank or objectivity as a judge of Pentagon officials' cred on these subjects.

And "their" behavior.

 

[Publius1787]

The new Pentagon papers

A high-ranking military officer reveals how Defense Department extremists suppressed information and twisted the truth to drive the country to war.

Karen Kwiatkowski

She was a Lieutenant Colonel which is an 0-5 in the AirForce. That's barely a field grade officer and well away from a general grade. So you can drop the term "high ranking" from your vocabulary. Most career officers achieve the ranks of major and lieutenant colonel. In the Air Force the rank is given out like candy. Likewise, Air Force intelligence deals with.. ... you got it !!!, Air threats, air assets, weather, and air capabilities. Good luck using her as an authority on Iraq.

What the fuck do either her rank, or the domain the article is hosted on, have to do with the content?

Talk about deflections....

Look at the title of the post. "High Ranking" it says, does it not? Why post it? Because obviously someone thinks it brings credibility to the "content." Next she derives her "bonifides" as an intelligence professional. Indeed she was, with respect to all things "Air."

That's a lot of words; you could have just said "I'm poisoning the well because I have no argument".

Indeed, to you a few lines might be "a lot of words."

 

[Pogo]

The new Pentagon papers

A high-ranking military officer reveals how Defense Department extremists suppressed information and twisted the truth to drive the country to war.

Karen Kwiatkowski

She was a Lieutenant Colonel which is an 0-5 in the AirForce. That's barely a field grade officer and well away from a general grade. So you can drop the term "high ranking" from your vocabulary. Most career officers achieve the ranks of major and lieutenant colonel. In the Air Force the rank is given out like candy. Likewise, Air Force intelligence deals with.. ... you got it !!!, Air threats, air assets, weather, and air capabilities. Good luck using her as an authority on Iraq.

What the fuck do either her rank, or the domain the article is hosted on, have to do with the content?

Talk about deflections....

Moreover the phrase "high ranking" is part of the subtitle on the link page itself. More moreover, the phrase could refer to her being "communications officer in the field and in acquisition programs, a speechwriter for the National Security Agency director, and on the Headquarters Air Force and the office of the secretary of defense staffs covering African affairs".

Salon is not a credible source. GEt back to me when this story grows some legs.

Salon is a web domain, Stupid. It's not a news company. Holy shit did you really post that?
How 'bout we take the same article and host it on assfuck.com. Better now?

Salon is the site host -- not the writer.

 

[JakeStarkey]

A LTC would be in a position to observe easily and judge the higher brass and its behavior. Good luck on using Publius 1787 who has no rank or objectivity as a judge of Pentagon officials' cred on these subjects.

And "their" behavior.

You have no cred, Publius, to make such a judgment.

The writer counts. Salon or Fox does not.

 

[Pogo]

The new Pentagon papers

A high-ranking military officer reveals how Defense Department extremists suppressed information and twisted the truth to drive the country to war.

Karen Kwiatkowski

She was a Lieutenant Colonel which is an 0-5 in the AirForce. That's barely a field grade officer and well away from a general grade. So you can drop the term "high ranking" from your vocabulary. Most career officers achieve the ranks of major and lieutenant colonel. In the Air Force the rank is given out like candy. Likewise, Air Force intelligence deals with.. ... you got it !!!, Air threats, air assets, weather, and air capabilities. Good luck using her as an authority on Iraq.

What the fuck do either her rank, or the domain the article is hosted on, have to do with the content?

Talk about deflections....

Look at the title of the post. "High Ranking" it says, does it not? Why post it? Because obviously someone thinks it brings credibility to the "content." Next she derives her "bonifides" as an intelligence professional. Indeed she was, with respect to all things "Air."

That's a lot of words; you could have just said "I'm poisoning the well because I have no argument".

Indeed, to you a few lines might be "a lot of words."

Hey, I'm just saving you time by cutting to the chase of what you don't have the honesty to admit.

 

[Publius1787]

A LTC would be in a position to observe easily and judge the higher brass and its behavior. Good luck on using Publius 1787 who has no rank or objectivity as a judge of Pentagon officials' cred on these subjects.

And "their" behavior.

You have no cred, Publius, to make such a judgment.

Please, tell me where my observation goes astray then.

 

[JakeStarkey]

A LTC would be in a position to observe easily and judge the higher brass and its behavior. Good luck on using Publius 1787 who has no rank or objectivity as a judge of Pentagon officials' cred on these subjects.

And "their" behavior.

You have no cred, Publius, to make such a judgment.

Please, tell me where my observation goes astray then.

By saying without any support that LTC K is not qualified. Who are you to say that?