CO2 Has Almost No Effect on Global Temperature, Says Leading Climate Scientist

[Dagosa]

Not funny just dumb.

You sound embarrassed to talk about it.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

How about..A Joint Message from the Protection of Creation," Pope Francis, Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby and Orthodox Ecumenical Patriarch ...
These are all speaking from the 97% of god fearing religious scientist of the world.
Actually 98%

You truly believe you have a point here don’t you?

 

[Dagosa]

You truly believe you have a point here don’t you?

So, you don’t believe Mitch McConnell ? We’re just starting from the top.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

So, you don’t believe Mitch McConnell ? We’re just starting from the top.

.






Keep trollin, trollin, trollin.........................

Back for your pathetic little social validation dopamine hit again, I see.






.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

You bird brains are at it again. Got another conspiracy theory for you. GOD.

Al Gore makes a FORTUNE peddling debunked, unproven whacko fake “science”

 

[Dagosa]

Al Gore makes a FORTUNE peddling debunked, unproven whacko fake “science”

Global warming is fake science ? . Al Gore invested in global warming. He couldn’t make money if it were fake news. You are foolish. You must think he’s the smartest man in the world to fool every country in the world in following his lead. How long have you been this stupid ?

 

[Dagosa]

Of course, this is true.

And if people truly believed that CO2 was this evil molecule they would be attacking China and India over those two nations building hundreds of coal-fired power plants and increasing their usage of coal.

​

Forget ‘settled’ science or ‘consensus’ – that is a political construct designed to quash debate in the interests of promoting a command-and-control Net Zero agenda. One of the great drivers of continual changes in the climate is heat exchange within both the atmosphere and the Earth’s surface. Current understanding of the entire picture is limited, and it seems the opportunity has been taken to fill this gap by blaming carbon dioxide almost entirely for the recent gentle warming. A new paper on the so-called ‘greenhouse’ effect highlights the vital role played by oceans and water vapour flows. CO2 is said to have “minimal effect” on the Earth’s temperature and climate.​

​

The paper has been published by the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) and is written by meteorologist William Kininmonth, a former consultant to the World Meteorological Organisation’s Commission for Climatology and former head of the Australian Government’s National Climate Centre. Kininmonth argues that the oceans are the “vital inertial and thermal flywheels” of the climate system. If one wants to control climate, it will be necessary to control the oceans, he argues. “Efforts to decarbonise in the hope of affecting global temperatures will be in vain,” he adds.​

​

In Kininmonth’s view, the recent warming is “probably simply the result of fluctuations in the ever-changing ocean circulation”. CO2 “must be recognised” as a very minor contributor to the observed warming, and one that is unlikely to prolong the warming trend beyond the peak generated by the natural oceanic oscillations, he notes. He explains that the main driver of global temperature is the movement of energy in water, both in the oceans and the atmosphere after evaporation.​

​

...​

​

Of course Kininmonth’s work will be largely ignored in the mainstream. The BBC will bin it, the Guardian might be tempted to run its usual in-house slur that bungs are being paid by BP; anyone publicising its conclusions runs the risk of woke corporations like PayPal suddenly withdrawing financial transactional services, while footling ‘fact checks’ will ensure black marks and warnings across social media. GWPF invited the Royal Society and the Met Office to review the Kininmonth paper, promising any response would be published as an appendix. “No reply was received,” noted the Foundation.​

CO2 Has Almost No Effect on Global Temperature, Says Leading Climate Scientist – The Daily Sceptic

Carbon dioxide has almost no effect on global temperature as almost all Earth's energy flows occur via the oceans and water vapour, William Kininmonth, a former head of Australia's National Climate Centre has said.

dailysceptic.org

What BS
All from a conservative hit job rag.
You guys know you’re FOS.
Or worse, you don’t know.
You’re science illiteracy is staggering

 

[otto105]

Of course, this is true.

And if people truly believed that CO2 was this evil molecule they would be attacking China and India over those two nations building hundreds of coal-fired power plants and increasing their usage of coal.

​

Forget ‘settled’ science or ‘consensus’ – that is a political construct designed to quash debate in the interests of promoting a command-and-control Net Zero agenda. One of the great drivers of continual changes in the climate is heat exchange within both the atmosphere and the Earth’s surface. Current understanding of the entire picture is limited, and it seems the opportunity has been taken to fill this gap by blaming carbon dioxide almost entirely for the recent gentle warming. A new paper on the so-called ‘greenhouse’ effect highlights the vital role played by oceans and water vapour flows. CO2 is said to have “minimal effect” on the Earth’s temperature and climate.​

​

The paper has been published by the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) and is written by meteorologist William Kininmonth, a former consultant to the World Meteorological Organisation’s Commission for Climatology and former head of the Australian Government’s National Climate Centre. Kininmonth argues that the oceans are the “vital inertial and thermal flywheels” of the climate system. If one wants to control climate, it will be necessary to control the oceans, he argues. “Efforts to decarbonise in the hope of affecting global temperatures will be in vain,” he adds.​

​

In Kininmonth’s view, the recent warming is “probably simply the result of fluctuations in the ever-changing ocean circulation”. CO2 “must be recognised” as a very minor contributor to the observed warming, and one that is unlikely to prolong the warming trend beyond the peak generated by the natural oceanic oscillations, he notes. He explains that the main driver of global temperature is the movement of energy in water, both in the oceans and the atmosphere after evaporation.​

​

...​

​

Of course Kininmonth’s work will be largely ignored in the mainstream. The BBC will bin it, the Guardian might be tempted to run its usual in-house slur that bungs are being paid by BP; anyone publicising its conclusions runs the risk of woke corporations like PayPal suddenly withdrawing financial transactional services, while footling ‘fact checks’ will ensure black marks and warnings across social media. GWPF invited the Royal Society and the Met Office to review the Kininmonth paper, promising any response would be published as an appendix. “No reply was received,” noted the Foundation.​

CO2 Has Almost No Effect on Global Temperature, Says Leading Climate Scientist – The Daily Sceptic

Carbon dioxide has almost no effect on global temperature as almost all Earth's energy flows occur via the oceans and water vapour, William Kininmonth, a former head of Australia's National Climate Centre has said.

dailysceptic.org

How long has the earth been flat for you?

 

[otto105]

Of course, this is true.

And if people truly believed that CO2 was this evil molecule they would be attacking China and India over those two nations building hundreds of coal-fired power plants and increasing their usage of coal.

​

Forget ‘settled’ science or ‘consensus’ – that is a political construct designed to quash debate in the interests of promoting a command-and-control Net Zero agenda. One of the great drivers of continual changes in the climate is heat exchange within both the atmosphere and the Earth’s surface. Current understanding of the entire picture is limited, and it seems the opportunity has been taken to fill this gap by blaming carbon dioxide almost entirely for the recent gentle warming. A new paper on the so-called ‘greenhouse’ effect highlights the vital role played by oceans and water vapour flows. CO2 is said to have “minimal effect” on the Earth’s temperature and climate.​

​

The paper has been published by the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) and is written by meteorologist William Kininmonth, a former consultant to the World Meteorological Organisation’s Commission for Climatology and former head of the Australian Government’s National Climate Centre. Kininmonth argues that the oceans are the “vital inertial and thermal flywheels” of the climate system. If one wants to control climate, it will be necessary to control the oceans, he argues. “Efforts to decarbonise in the hope of affecting global temperatures will be in vain,” he adds.​

​

In Kininmonth’s view, the recent warming is “probably simply the result of fluctuations in the ever-changing ocean circulation”. CO2 “must be recognised” as a very minor contributor to the observed warming, and one that is unlikely to prolong the warming trend beyond the peak generated by the natural oceanic oscillations, he notes. He explains that the main driver of global temperature is the movement of energy in water, both in the oceans and the atmosphere after evaporation.​

​

...​

​

Of course Kininmonth’s work will be largely ignored in the mainstream. The BBC will bin it, the Guardian might be tempted to run its usual in-house slur that bungs are being paid by BP; anyone publicising its conclusions runs the risk of woke corporations like PayPal suddenly withdrawing financial transactional services, while footling ‘fact checks’ will ensure black marks and warnings across social media. GWPF invited the Royal Society and the Met Office to review the Kininmonth paper, promising any response would be published as an appendix. “No reply was received,” noted the Foundation.​

CO2 Has Almost No Effect on Global Temperature, Says Leading Climate Scientist – The Daily Sceptic

Carbon dioxide has almost no effect on global temperature as almost all Earth's energy flows occur via the oceans and water vapour, William Kininmonth, a former head of Australia's National Climate Centre has said.

dailysceptic.org

Dude, I see you have been elected to the flat earth society.

Must have been a life goal for you after national socialism.

 

[ReinyDays]

Al Gore makes a FORTUNE peddling debunked, unproven whacko fake “science”

On top of the fortune he made investing in Google ... where do people go to find out what all these fancy-pants sciency words Al Gore throws around? ... it's like he invented the internet just to make money or something ... what nerve, doesn't he get enough kickbacks from his time as US Senator? ... or Vice-President? ...

 

[otto105]

On top of the fortune he made investing in Google ... where do people go to find out what all these fancy-pants sciency words Al Gore throws around? ... it's like he invented the internet just to make money or something ... what nerve, doesn't he get enough kickbacks from his time as US Senator? ... or Vice-President? ...

Unproven?

Can one of you climate denying fuckups post one scientific organization that agrees with your position.

 

[Dagosa]

Unproven?

Can one of you climate denying fuckups post one scientific organization that agrees with your position.

The only way they can, is to do what they have always done; claim NASA doesn’t use real science while Newsmax and Tucker does.

 

[ReinyDays]

Unproven?

Can one of you climate denying fuckups post one scientific organization that agrees with your position.

Mark Landsea of the NHC ... we only have 50 years of data on Hurricanes ... Dr Landsea holds the position that this isn't enough data to predict future intensities or frequencies ... if you go through all the satellite data, you'll see there's no change in either of these quantities ... hurricane intensity and frequency are statistically equal across the entire time frame ... and this certainly disproves your position ... do the math yourself and see ...

Why do you believe in hypercanes and hockey sticks? ...

 

[otto105]

Mark Landsea of the NHC ... we only have 50 years of data on Hurricanes ... Dr Landsea holds the position that this isn't enough data to predict future intensities or frequencies ... if you go through all the satellite data, you'll see there's no change in either of these quantities ... hurricane intensity and frequency are statistically equal across the entire time frame ... and this certainly disproves your position ... do the math yourself and see ...

Why do you believe in hypercanes and hockey sticks? ...

When did Chris Landsea state that?

And yes, the hockey stick is real.

 

[ReinyDays]

When did Chris Landsea state that?

And yes, the hockey stick is real.

January 21st, 2005 ... Here's an OpEd from MIT ... and Chris Landsea's open letter of resignation from the IPCC ...

Why do you think the hockey stick is real? ... have you done the math yourself? ... temperature is proportional to the fourth-root of irradiance ... or do you agree with Chick that Stefan-Boltzmann Law is bullshit? ... even though, in fact, we're modelling the climate system using SB ... but that's just climatologists, I suppose Bubba can model this anyway he wants to ... keep in mind that a Canadian court-of-law found the hockey stick principles without merit ... not that it's wrong, rather it's unproven ... and the author remains silent in this matter ...

We'd need CO2 emission to increase quadratically on top of quadratically ... to the fourth power ... in order to create straight line temperature increase ... more for your hockey stick effect ... [shrugs shoulders] ... The State of California expects 15-year-old children to understand this ...

T^4 = (S ( 1 - a )) / 4eo [where T=temperature, S=solar constant, a=albedo, e=emissivity and o=SB constant]

 

[otto105]

January 21st, 2005 ... Here's an OpEd from MIT ... and Chris Landsea's open letter of resignation from the IPCC ...

Why do you think the hockey stick is real? ... have you done the math yourself? ... temperature is proportional to the fourth-root of irradiance ... or do you agree with Chick that Stefan-Boltzmann Law is bullshit? ... even though, in fact, we're modelling the climate system using SB ... but that's just climatologists, I suppose Bubba can model this anyway he wants to ... keep in mind that a Canadian court-of-law found the hockey stick principles without merit ... not that it's wrong, rather it's unproven ... and the author remains silent in this matter ...

We'd need CO2 emission to increase quadratically on top of quadratically ... to the fourth power ... in order to create straight line temperature increase ... more for your hockey stick effect ... [shrugs shoulders] ... The State of California expects 15-year-old children to understand this ...

T^4 = (S ( 1 - a )) / 4eo [where T=temperature, S=solar constant, a=albedo, e=emissivity and o=SB constant]

2005?

Hilarious for the meteorologist apology tour guide.

 

[ReinyDays]

2005?

Hilarious for the meteorologist apology tour guide.

At least I understand the basics of meteorology ... and weather was the same in 2005 ... why do you believe in hockey sticks? ...

 

[otto105]

At least I understand the basics of meteorology ... and weather was the same in 2005 ... why do you believe in hockey sticks? ...

Facts.

Over your political bias.

 

[ReinyDays]

Facts.

Over your political bias.

Meteorology is a science ... it addresses scientific facts ... specifically the flow of energy ... so very heavy on thermodynamics ... we integrate the force with respect to time to get work performed ... W = ∫F dt ...

Temperature is the measure of internal kinetic energy ... this can't change unless work is performed ... Physics 101 ... (which is required to take Meteorology 201, which is required to take Climatology 301) ...

If you don't understand calculus ... you won't understand why weather changes ... nor if or why climate changes ... see above, we need both force and time to change temperature ... and forces in the climate system are few and far between ... and both are accounted for already ...

The math says you're relying on magic forces ...

Why do you see politics? ... I'm pro-abortion, pro-drugs and pro-amnesty ... a McGovernik Democrat, leaning towards Marxism ... heavily in favor of nationalizing the health care system here, put every doctor on Federal government payroll ... start fining people for being over-weight ... I'd love to see Big Oil destroyed ... mandate EVs, building insulation and conservation ...

THROW TRUMP IN PRISON ... we have charges lined up for Quid Pro Joe next ... do we go after Donald Jr? ... we need that precedence to go after Hunter Bidet ... fucking thief ... what the hell was Hunter doing in The Ukraine and why did the little fucker start a war there? ...

... but all you're worried about is a pussy single degree temperature change ... "the sky is falling, the sky is falling" ... those are Halliburton's torn up IOUs ...

 

[otto105]

Meteorology is a science ... it addresses scientific facts ... specifically the flow of energy ... so very heavy on thermodynamics ... we integrate the force with respect to time to get work performed ... W = ∫F dt ...

Temperature is the measure of internal kinetic energy ... this can't change unless work is performed ... Physics 101 ... (which is required to take Meteorology 201, which is required to take Climatology 301) ...

If you don't understand calculus ... you won't understand why weather changes ... nor if or why climate changes ... see above, we need both force and time to change temperature ... and forces in the climate system are few and far between ... and both are accounted for already ...

The math says you're relying on magic forces ...

Why do you see politics? ... I'm pro-abortion, pro-drugs and pro-amnesty ... a McGovernik Democrat, leaning towards Marxism ... heavily in favor of nationalizing the health care system here, put every doctor on Federal government payroll ... start fining people for being over-weight ... I'd love to see Big Oil destroyed ... mandate EVs, building insulation and conservation ...

THROW TRUMP IN PRISON ... we have charges lined up for Quid Pro Joe next ... do we go after Donald Jr? ... we need that precedence to go after Hunter Bidet ... fucking thief ... what the hell was Hunter doing in The Ukraine and why did the little fucker start a war there? ...

... but all you're worried about is a pussy single degree temperature change ... "the sky is falling, the sky is falling" ... those are Halliburton's torn up IOUs ...

Does it have the backing of any scientific organization?


Why not?